Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1965 )


Menu:
  •                                      August4, 1965
    A-bHxiY\-     ,ia.;5r.lb.I.
    Honorable Robert S. Cslvert              Opinion Ro. C-4yir
    Comptrollerof Public Accounts
    Aushn, Texas                             Re: Whether the First
    Assistants and Chief
    Deputies In the various
    State offices end
    departmentsare entltled
    to reimbursementfor
    their actual meals,
    lodging and incidental
    expenses while travel-
    lng on official business
    either ln or out of the
    Dear Mr. Calvert:                            State of Texas.
    You have requested a~ opinion from this department
    on the question as hereinafter stated:
    Whether the First Assistants and Chief Deputies
    In the various State offices and departments'are.
    entitled to reimbursementfor their actual meals,
    lodglng and Incidental expenses while traveling
    on official business either in or out of the
    State of Texas.
    In connection with this request, I quote from your
    letter the following:                                 i
    "In this connection I invite your attention
    to subsection (a) of Section 17, Article V of
    House Bill 86, Acts 56th Legislature,Biennial
    AppropriationBill from September 1, 1963 to
    August 31, 1965, both dates inclusive,which
    reads as follows:
    'Executiveheads of State agencies,
    Including the Executive Director of the
    Legislative Council, shall be reimbursed for
    their actual meals,,lodging and incidental
    expenses when traveling on official business
    either in or loutof the State.'
    -2259-
    Hon. Robert S. Calvert',
    page 2 (C-477)
    "Also I want to call your attention to
    subsection (a) of Section 17, Article V of
    Rouse Bill 12, Acts 59th Legislature,Biennial
    AppropriationBill from September 1, 1965 to
    August 31,'1967,which reads as follows:
    'Executiveheads of State agencies,~
    including~theExecutive Director of the
    LegislativeCouncil, shall be reimbursed for
    , their actual meals, lodging and incidental
    expenses when traveling on official business          ; :
    either in or out of the State.'
    "Further,I Invite your attention to Section
    2 of &he Travel RegulationsAct of 1959, Codified
    as Article 6823a of Vernon's Civil Statutes,,which
    provides:
    ll%e provl&ons of this Act shall apply to
    all officers, heads of state agencies, and
    state employees. The provisions of this Act
    shall not apply to judges and other judicial
    employees~paldby the state, counties or other,
    political subdivielonspursuant to law. Heads
    of state agencies shall mean elected state
    officials, excludingmembers of the Legislature
    who shall receive travel reimbursement as pro-
    vlded by the Constitution,appointed state
    officials>appointed state officials whose. ..'
    appointment Is subject to Senate confirmation,
    directors of ltiglslal$veinterim committeesor
    boards, heads of state hospitals and special
    schools, and heads of state lnstltutlonsof.
    higher education.' (Bmphaslsadded)
    "I have no difficulty In determiningthat
    elected State officials and appointed State
    officials who are confirmedby the Senate are
    entitled to reimbursementfor their actual meals,
    lodging and~incidentalexpenses;   however, i.n view
    of the fact that the Travel RegulationsAct of 1959,
    as amended, also defines heads of State agencies
    to include 'appointedState officials,'I am desirous
    of securing  your opinion as above stated on whether
    thls terminologyshould be construcd'asincluding
    the First Assistants and Chief Deputies in the
    various State Offices, Departmentsand Agencies.
    It is my understandingthat these officials take
    the official oath of office, and ln most.cases,
    -2260-
    Ron. Robert S. Calvert,   page   3 (C-477)
    they have complete authority to function in the
    absence.or inability of the particular office
    holder."
    Article 4340, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas,.
    provides in part as follows:
    "The office of Chief Clerk to the Secretary
    of State Is hereby abolished, and the office of
    Assistant Secretary of State Is hereby created.
    The Assistant Secretary of State shall be an
    attorne    -at-law, and he shall have had at least
    five (5 7 years actual practice in this State
    prior to his appointmentand shall perform all
    the duties required by law to be performed
    by the Secretary of State ‘whenthe said Secretary
    of State Is absent or unable to act for any reason.
    . . . The said Assistant Secretary of State shall
    serve as such so long as the Secretary of State
    appointing Na is In office."
    Artlcle,u12, Revised Civil Statutes, of Texas, pro-
    vides:
    "In case of the absence or Inability of the
    Attorney General to act, the first office assistant
    of the Attorney General shall discharge the duties
    which devolve by law upon the Attorney General.”
    Article 4352, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas,
    provide8 :
    "The Comptroller shall appoint a chief clerk,
    who shall take the official oath aad give bond in
    the sum of ten thoueand dollars payable in like
    nmnner as the bond of the Comptroller,conditioned
    for the faithful performance of his duties. ‘Said
    clerk shall perform the duties of the Comptroller
    when the Comptrollermay be unavoidably absent
    or incapable, from sickness or other cause, to
    discharge said duties, : . .v
    The above Statutes are set out to point out a few .
    o,ieFs Statute8 creating the offices of Assistants and Chief
    .
    In the case of Pfeffer v. Whnke, 
    260 S.W. 1031
    (Tex.Com.App.1924), In discu8sing Articles 4318 and 4319,
    -2261-
    i ...
    ;
    Hon. Robert S. Calvert,   page 4 (C-477)
    Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, which Is now Article 4340,
    and Article 4343, which is now Article 4352 of the Revised
    Civil Statutes of Texas, the Court said:
    "It is observed that articles 4318 and
    4343, respectively,require that the secretary
    of state and the comptrollershall each ap-
    point a chief clerk. It Is not optional with
    either to appoint or not appoint such chief
    clerk. The statute Is mandatory In providing
    for a chief clerk for each. The offices of
    chief clerk of each Is thus created by statute.
    It is likewise observed that the statutes
    provide that, ln the absence of the secretary
    of state,  or his inability to act from any
    cause, the chief clerk may perform all the
    duties required by law of that officer, and
    that It shall be the duty of the chief clerk
    of the comptrollerto discharge the duties
    of the comptrollerwhen he may be unavoidably
    absent or Incapable from sickness, or other
    causes, to discharge said duties.
    "The service of the secretaryof state
    and the comptrolleron the board of educa-
    tion 1s the performanceby each of a duty.
    attached by the statute    to the office held
    by each. The duties are not personal. They        f
    are duties attached to the offices. Any hold-
    er of the office of secretaryof state or comp-
    troller must serve as a member of the board of
    education as a part of the duties of those
    offices respectively. Since the statutes pro-~
    vlde that the chief clerks pyryrespectively
    perform the duties attaching to those offices,
    the chief clerks..may,   ln the contingencies
    mentioned In the statutes,perform the par-
    ticular duties attaching to the offices of
    secretary of state and comptrollerby virtue
    of the statutes making them members of the
    board of education. In such cases the chief
    clerks do not perform those duties by delega-
    tion of authority from their chiefs. They         ,
    perform them by virtue of authority of the
    Legislature In the same way that their chiefs
    are authorized to perform them. The Iegls-
    lature could have provided that, In the
    absence, etc., of the secretary of state and
    -2262-
    .   .   *                                                                  -
    Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 5 (C&7)
    'comptroller,the chief clerks of either or
    each should be members of the board of cd-'
    ucatlon. The Ieglelaturehas-+one the same
    thing ln a differentway by prescribing that
    the chief clerks provided by statute shall
    and may, in the absence of the secretary 00
    state and the comptroller,perform the duties
    of those officers, among which are duties
    arising from their membership on the state
    board of education. Thus the chief clerk8
    are officers provided by statute, and
    authorized by statute, to perform the duties
    attaching to the officers of secretary of state
    and comptroller,making those officers members
    of the board of education. The ruii authority
    of the chief clerks thun to .act arises from
    the acts of the Leglslature~lnvestlngthem
    with such authority *hen the contlngencles
    mentioned ln the statutes arise. There IS
    no delegation or authority to the~chlef
    clerks by the secretaryof state and the
    comptroller. In truth and ln fact, the
    secretaryof state and the comptrollerare
    lmpotent to prevent the chief clerks from
    thus performlng the dutler o? those offices
    ln the contlngenclesof the statutes author-    '
    lzing them to act. ~!Phechief clerks have the
    sazszauthority to perform the duties of those
    offAces in those contingenciesthat the
    secretary of state and.coolptroller.haveto
    perform them at all otherstimes--theauthority
    of the Legislature. The chler clerks are
    ,I
    .   .   .   '   (Emphasisadded)
    The foregoing case authorSty makes It clear that
    where a statute authorizes the designationof someone to
    exercise the powers and carry out the functions of a stats
    office ln the absence or inability to perform of the person
    holding such office, the person so designated to act derives
    hls authority, not by delegation from the officer he holds
    under, but, directly from the Legislature,and la, therefore,
    a public officer of this State.
    -2263-
    page 6 (C-477)
    Hon. Robert S. Calvert,,
    It therefore follows that when an Individual Is
    designatedas first assistant, chief deputy, or by whatever
    title, to 'a State office, pursuant to a statute whereby
    such person has the atatutoiy authority to act for such
    office, he Is an "appointedstate official" as that term
    Is used ln the definitionof "heads of state agencies" set
    forth ln Section 2 of Article 6823a of.Vernon'sCivil
    Statutes.
    It Is therefore the opinion of this office that
    any first assistant, chief deputy, or by whatever title
    known, of the various State offices, departmentsand agencies,
    who are authorized by statute to act for such office, depart-
    ment or agency ln the absence of, illness or inability to
    act of,the head of 8UCh office, departmentor agency, is an
    appointed State official, and such appointed State official
    would-be entitled to reimbursementfor their actual meals,
    lodging and incidentalexpenses while traveling on official
    business either ln or out of the State of Texas.
    .,:
    :.
    :_;
    !':-
    First Assistants and Chief Deputles"lnthe
    various State offices and departments,who are
    authorizedby statute to act for such office or
    department ln the absence of, Illness or inability
    to act of the'head of such office or department;
    is an appointed State official, and would be entitled
    to reimbursementfor his actual meals, lodging and
    incidentalexpenses while travelingon official
    business, either in or out of the State of,Texas,
    Yours very truly,
    WAOCORRR
    CARR
    Attorney General
    BY
    J?lB:sj
    .‘.,-2264-
    Ron. Robert S. ~Calvert,page 7 (Can)
    APFROVED:
    OPIRIOR COMMITTEE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Pat Bailey
    Philllp,,Crawford
    Arthur Sandlin
    Roy B. Johnson
    APPROVRDFOR!lXRA!ITORRRYGRRRRAL
    BY: T. B. Wright
    ,
    -2265-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C-477

Judges: Waggoner Carr

Filed Date: 7/2/1965

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017