Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1963 )


Menu:
  • Honorable Robert S. Calve&          Opinion No. C- 64
    Comptroller of Public Accounts
    Capitol Station                     Re:   Computation of Inheri-
    Austin, Texas                             tance Taxes on Royalty
    Interest of Life Tenant
    Dear Mr. Calvert:                         Under Submitted Facts
    We quote the following from your letter requesting the
    opinion of this office on the above captioned matter:
    "We desire the opinion of your office
    regarding the computation of Inheritance
    taxes on royalty interests of life ten-
    ants under submitted facts.
    "John Alexander Graves, Jr., died
    testate a resident of Tarrant County on
    October 9, 1962, owning a royalty inter-
    est under 612 acres of land in Jackson
    County, Texas. This royalty interest
    has a value of $40,000 based upon a
    twenty-four months payout.
    "Paragraph 4 of the will of the de-
    ceased reads in part as follows:
    "II bequeath and devise to my beloved
    wife, Nancy Kay Graves, for her life,
    all my interest and estate in my lands
    in Jackson County, Texas, . . . . con-
    taining 732 acres more or less of which
    I own the surface, and an undivided
    interest in the minerals in and under
    612 acres of said lands, my mineral
    interest not including Lot 11 thereof.
    "'In addition to a life estate, I
    devise and grant to my said wife a gen-
    eral power of appointment&over said
    lands and estates In Jackson County,
    Texas. This power may be exercised by
    deed or by will by appointment to whom-
    ever she desires, or to herself, her
    -313-.
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 2           Opinion No. C- 64
    estate, her creditors or the creditors
    of her estate for whatever objects she
    desires. Upon the death of my wife,
    should she fail to effectively exercise
    the power of appointment, I direct that
    the property shall pass in equal shares
    to my daughter, Nancy Ann Wynne, and to
    my son, John A. Graves, III.
    "'My said wife is to hold her life
    estate in said lands without bond and
    without liability for impeachment for
    waste, and is to have all the rights
    of the owner of a legal life estate
    including the right to possess and
    enjoy said property, to receive and
    use the entire income therefrom with
    power to dispose the principal and
    accrued or accumulated but undistri-
    buted income as she shall appoint.
    "'My said wife is to have full power
    and authority to use or to lease the
    surface of said lands for agricultural
    or commercial purposes and to make any
    use of the surface of said lands which
    she determines to be useful and profit-
    able, and to drill water wells thereon
    and use or sell the water found or pro-
    duced on said lands.
    "'My said wife is to have full power
    and authority to develop and produce
    any oil, gas, sulphur, gravel, clay,
    or other minerals on and under said
    lands, and to open new wells and mines
    and to market and sell all the products
    from said lands. She Is to have full
    power and authority to make and execute
    oil and gas leases, all easements,
    rights-of-way, surface leases, and to
    receive and use as her own property
    all bonus moneys, and consideration
    for same, all rentals, royalties, pay-
    ments out of oil or gas or other min-
    erals, payments for non-development,
    drainage or damages, and any and all
    sums due and payable in connection with
    the drilling and development and pro-
    duction of 011, gas, sulphur, or any
    other minerals from said lands.
    -314-
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 3            Opinion No, C-64
    "'In the exercise of the power of
    appointment hereby granted, my wife
    may appoint life estates to one or
    more objects of the power with remain-
    der to others, appoint to grandchildren
    even though the parents of such ap-
    pointees are still living, appoint by
    deed or by will executed during my life-
    time or after my death.
    "'The above does not limit or re-
    strict her powers as holder of a life
    estate or as donee under the power of
    appointment above granted, and she is
    to own and hold said property as her
    own without restriction on her right
    to use, consume and dispose of said
    property.'
    "The surviving spouse and principal
    beneficiary has a life expectancy of
    nine years and therefore will consume
    all the mineral value, so we are attempt-
    ing to distribute this interest for inheri-
    tance tax purposes according to your rul-
    ing in Opinion No. 1063, . . . ,
    "Please advise whether or not the hold-
    ing in this opinion is applicable to the
    submitted facts."
    Opinion No. ``-1063   was concerned with the following facts.
    The decedent's will devised all her real property to her legally
    adopted son for life to have the use and benefit of same as his
    separate property, and upon his death, said real property was
    to vest in such of his issue as he might by will appoint. The
    will further provided for the disposition of the property cov-
    ered by this devise In the event of failure to exercise the
    power of appointment. There passed under this provision of
    the will a royalty interest in the Old Ocean Field in Brazoria
    County, Texas. The average monthly income from the royalty
    interest was $6,300.00.    The mineral interest was valued at
    $``O,OOO.OO on a loo-month payout basis.
    The opinion stated that the life estate in the land
    extended to the unsevered oil and gas beneath the surface. The
    beneficiary, at the time of the decedent's death, had a life
    expectancy of 36.7 years. Since he would receive the entire
    royalty interest in 100 months, the opinion held that inheritance
    -315-
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 4           Opinion No. C- 64
    taxes should be computed on the entire value of the life ten-
    ant's royalty interest, rather than under the provisions of
    Article 14.08, Ch. 14, Title 122A, 20A, Tax.-Gen., Vernon's
    Annotated Texas Statutes, which provides the statutory method
    for computing the value of two or more estates, as an estate
    for years or for life, and a remainder.
    We have concluded that we were in error In so holding,
    and that Opinion No. ``-1063 must be overruled in view of
    zlfvert v. Thompson, 
    339 S.W.2d 685
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1960, error
    . .
    In the Thompson case, the decedent's will contained the
    following provision:
    "All of the rest and residue of my
    property, real, personal and mixed, I
    hereby give, devise and bequeath to my
    beloved wife, Cora Thompson, during her
    lifetime, with full power to sell or
    otherwise dispose of same, and at her
    death, to my children John W. Thompson
    and Ida May Thompson, share and share
    alike, in fee simple."
    The tax was assessed against the interest of Cora Thompson
    and its amount was determined on the basis of the value of the
    entire residuary estate. The court held that the fact that the
    life tenant was given the power of disposal did not change the
    estate into something other than an estate for life citing,
    among other cases , Wier v. Smith 
    62 Tex. 1
    (1884j;Edds v.
    Mitchell, 
    143 Tex. 307
    , 184 S.W.2; 823 (19451, and authorities
    cited therein. This, of course, had long been the established
    rule in the jurisprudence of this state.
    At page 688, the court said:
    “L-23   The statute, Art. 
    7123,l supra
    ,
    ' Article 7123, presently carried as Article 14.08, Ch. 14,
    Title 122A, 20A, Tax.-Gen., V.A.T.S., reads as follows:
    "If the property passing as aforesaid shall
    be.divided into two or more estates, as an estate
    for years or for life and a remainder, the tax
    shall be levied on each estate or interest separ-
    ately, according to the value of the same at the
    death of the decedent. The value of estates for
    -316-
    L       .h
    .
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 5              Opinion No. C-64
    is plain In providing the method for deter-
    mining the value of estates for life and
    remainders and any other method of deter-
    mining such values would violate the sta-
    tute. For this reason the most probable
    future disposition of the estate by the
    life tenant would not be a proper Item to
    be considered In determining the amount of
    inheritance taxes due. . . ."
    Since the Texas courts have held that valuation for ln-
    heritance tax purposes is unaffected by the life tenant's un-
    fettered power of sale, we think that we are bound to disregard
    the fact that in the instant case, as well as In Opinion No.
    ~11-1063,   the life tenant could receive the entire value of the
    royalty interest. Opinion No. ``-1063     is hereby overruled, and
    you are advised that inheritance taxes should be computed under
    the provisions of Article 14.08.
    SUMMARY
    Under submitted facts, inheritance tax
    should be computed on life tenant's royalty
    interest according to the provisions of Arti-
    cle 14.08, Ch. 14, Title 122A, Tax.-Gen.,
    V.A.T.S. Opinion No. ~14-1063 is hereby over-
    ruled.
    Yours very truly,
    WAGGONER CARR
    Attorney General of Texas
    MMP/jP
    APPROVED:
    ' (Cont'd)
    years, estates for life, remainders and annuities,
    shall be determined by the 'Actuaries Combined
    Experience Tables,' at four per cent compound
    interest."
    -317-
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 6   Opinion No. C- 64
    OPINION COMMITTEE:
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    W. E. Allen
    J. Arthur Sandlin
    Ernest Fortenberry
    APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    By: Stanton Stone
    -318-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C-64

Judges: Waggoner Carr

Filed Date: 7/2/1963

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017