Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1957 )


Menu:
  •              %-HE       ~-lTORXEY           GENEHAL
    OFTEXAS
    Doctor James A. Turman                Opinion No. WW-294
    Aotlng Executive Mrector
    Texas Youth Council                   Re:   Whether or not the Comp-
    Austin, Texas                               troller may approve
    warrants covering the
    cost of transportation
    for students being
    released from Texas Youth
    Counail facilities to
    their own homes, or such
    other homes as the ~Council
    may approve, if such homes
    are outside the State of
    Dear Dr. Turman:                            Texas.
    You have requested our opinion on whether or not the
    Comptroller may approve warrants covering the aost of traris-
    portation for students being released from Texas Youth Council
    facilities to their own homes, or such other homes as the
    Council may approve, If such homes are outside the State of
    Texas.
    Senate Bill 303, which turns over the administration
    of all correctional schools for delinquent children to the
    Texas Youth Council, provides as follows:
    Texas Laws, Regular Session, 1957, Chapter 281,
    page 660:
    'Sea. 27.
    The Youth Counoil may release under
    plaae delinqm
    m           &a$s:$;%n;h;;:       usual homes or in
    any situation or family that It has approved. The
    Youth Council may, subject to appropriation, employ
    parole officers for Investigating, placing, super-
    vising and otherwise directing the aotivitles of a
    parolee so as to insure his/her adjustment to
    society in accordance with rules and regulations
    established by the Texas Youth Council, and work
    with local organizations, clubs, and agencies In
    formulating plans and prooedures for the prevention
    of juvenile delinquency. The Youth Counail may, at
    any time, until finally discharged by the Youth
    Doctor James A. Turman, Page 2 (w-294)
    Councii,_ resume
    _    the care and custody,of any child ,
    released unaer parole supervision. [Rnphasls ours)
    "Sec. 28. (a) The Youth Council shall Insure
    that each delinquent child It releases under
    supervision has suitable clothing, transportation
    to his home, or to the county in which a suitable
    home or employment has been found for him, and
    such an amount of money as the rules of the Youth
    Council authorize."
    This general provision in Senate Bill 303 applies
    onlv to delinauent children released bv the Youth Council
    under supervision. When interpreted in the light of 
    Section 27 supra
    , it is our opinion that under supervision means
    under parole supervision of the Texas Youth Council and sub-
    ject to their recall at any time prior to final discharge.
    We cannot believe that the Legislature intended to confer
    supervisory powers on the Texas Youth Council which extend
    beyond the borders of the State of Texas, for to do so would
    be to give extra-territorial effect to the laws of Texas.
    9 Tex. Jur. 355, Conflict of Laws, Sec. 3; Phillips v. Perue,
    
    111 Tex. 112
    (1921); Willis v. Missouri Pacific Railway C 0. f
    
    61 Tex. 432
    (1884); Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Epley, 
    218 S.W. 528
    (1920).
    Article 514315,Vernon's Civil Statutes, reads as
    follows:
    "Section 1. Upon the discharge or parole of
    any person committed to the Gatesville State School
    for Boys or the Gainesville State School for Girls,
    the Superintendent of the Institution from which
    such person is discharged or paroled shall provide
    them with a complete suit of suitable clothing, and
    Five Dollars ($5) in money, and procure transporta-
    tion for them to their homes, if resident of this
    State, or to the county in which they may have:been
    convicted or to such other place In the State at
    which said discharged or paroled person may have
    procured employment or to a place where a suitable
    home has been found for such person.
    "Sec. 2. The furnishing of clothing and
    transportation and the payment of money may be made
    from appropriations for support and maintenance
    made to the Institution from which such person was
    discharged or paroled, or from local funds, or from
    any appropriation specifically made for such
    Doctor James A. Turman, Page 3 (WW-294)
    purposes by the Legislature of the State of Texas.”
    The statutes clearly indicate that a person dis-
    charged or paroled from the Gatesvllle or Gainesville Schools,
    whether under State supervision or not, Is entitled to
    transportation to the county in which he was convicted, his
    home, or any county in which a suitable job has been found
    for him, but not to any point outside the State of Texas.
    These are the only statutes found in the general law
    of Texas providing for transportation for students released
    from Texas correctional schools, and these statutes as related
    above do not constitute authority for out-of-state transporta-
    tion.
    Your letter also made reference to House Bill 133,
    which provides as follows:
    Texas Laws, Regular Session, 1957, Chapter 385,
    Section 7b, page 870:
    "b. The cost of deporting any non-resident or
    alien may be paid by any of the institutions named
    In this Article from appropriated funds available
    to such institutions. It is further provided that
    expenditures from appropriation items designated
    'General Operating Expenses' and 'other operating
    expense' in this Article, for the purposes of      ,.
    deporting non-residents or aliens or of returning
    Texas patients or students from other states, shall
    be governed by the ;ollowing additional rules and
    procedures: . . .
    This is an appropriation bill and cannot grant
    additional authority to the Youth Council beyond that already
    provided for in the general law, since to do so would require
    general legislation, which cannot be included in a general
    appropriation bill. Tex. Const., Art. III, Sec. 35; Moore v.
    See also Attorney General's
    !?i%Ft%5ig~i~jY j2&5,5Z965 (1935).
    Further, the Legislature cannot make an appropriation
    for any purpose for which authority cannot be found in "pre-
    existing law". Tex. Const., Art. III, Sec. 44; Nichols v.
    State, 
    32 S.W. 452
    , writ ref. (1895); Fort Worth Cavalry Club
    -Sheppard,   
    83 S.W.2d 660
    (1935); State v. Haldeman, lb3
    S.W. 1020, writ ref. (1913).
    It therefore follows that the Comptroller has no
    Doctor James A. Turman, Page 4 (WW-294)
    authority to approve warrants covering the cost of transpor-
    tation for students being released from Texas Youth Council
    facilities to any place outside the State of Texas.
    SUMMARY
    The Comptroller may not approve warrants
    covering the cost of transportation for
    students being released from Texas Youth
    Council facilities to their own homes or
    such other homes as the Council may
    approve if such homes are outside the
    State of Texas.
    Very truly yours,
    WILL WILSON
    Attorney General of Texas
    GC:pf:jl
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    H. Grady Chandler, Chairman
    J. C. Davis, Jr.
    W. V. Geppert
    C. K. Richards
    Geo. P. Blackburn
    REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    BY:
    James N. Ludlum