Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1957 )


Menu:
  •             .a     ,
    .   .   -
    August 19, 1957   '-=---'--          I
    Hon. James A. Giddings     Opinion No. WW-221
    State Hospital Board
    Austin, Texas             Re:   Is the Austin State School Farm
    Colony a separate institution
    apart from the Austin State
    Dear Mr. Giddings:              School, and related questions.
    We have received your two letters requesting opin-
    ions pertaining to the State Farm Colony and the State Dairy
    and Hog Farm, and we will answer both requests in this opinion.
    You have requested our opinion as to the legal status
    of the Austin State School Farm Colony and the State Dairy and
    Hog Farm as being state institutions constituting a part of the
    "Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools", specifically re-
    questing the answers to several questions which will be set
    forth and answered below:
    In 1949 by ch. 157, Acts 5'lstLeg., p0 324 (codified
    as Art. 317&a, Vernon's Civil Statutes) the Legislature enumer-
    ated certain eleemosynary institutions of the State of Texas
    and stated that thereafter such institutions should be known
    and designated as the "Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools."
    All of the eleemosynary institutions so enumerated were either
    authorized by provisions of the Constitution of Texas, or were
    created by statute enacted pursuant thereto, except the State
    Dairy and Hog Farm and Austin State School Farm Colony,
    The first statutory reference to the Austin State
    School Farm Colony appears in Chapter 107, Acts 43rd Leg,, R.S,
    1933, at pa 242, which is the appropriation bill for eleemosy-
    nary institutions. Under the section dealing with the Austin
    State School, appears an appropriation of any unused balance
    appropriated to the Austin State School for the year ending
    August 31, 1933, which may be used by the Superintendent of the
    Austin State School and the State Board of Control durfng the
    year ending August 31, 1934 "for the uurchase of equipment,
    materials, supplies, necessary land and the construction of
    suitable buildfngs and improvements in establishing and operat-
    ing a -arm colony for the feeble-minded to be under the man-
    agement of the Austin State School and the Board of Control."
    Chapter 10, Acts 43rd Leg., 3rd C.S. 1934, pQ 16, Sec. 1, appro-
    priated the sum of $65,000.00 to the Austin State School for a
    i   .. _
    Hon. James A. Giddings, page 2   (WW-221)
    "ward building and equipment to be constructed on the Feeble-
    Minded Farm Colony, including utility connections and mainten-
    ance and support.l'
    The first mention of the State Dairy and Hog Farm
    appears in ch. 567, Acts 57th Leg., 19419 p. 943, making an
    appropriation for the "Austin State School Farm Colony" for the
    biennium ending August 31, 1943. Item 39 is an appropriation
    of $20,000.00 for the purpose of "moving, enlarging, improving
    and centralizing dairy and hog site."
    You have advised that legislative appropriations have
    been made to the Austin State School Farm Colony and the State
    Dairy and Hog Farm by succeeding Legislatures and that since
    September 1, 1949, when the control and management of the Texas
    State Hospitals and Special Schools was transferred from the
    State Board of Control to the Board for Texas State Hospitals
    and Special Schools (Art. 3174b, V.C.S.), the Board for Texas
    State Hospitals and Special Schools has regularly employed a
    Superintendent and Business Manager for the Austin State Farm
    Colony who has signed accounts against the appropriated fund
    for that institution under the authority of Sec. 10, Art. 3174b,
    V.C.S.
    The office of the State Auditor has questioned the
    validity of the appointment of the Superintendent of the Austin
    State School Farm Colony and the payment of his salary by the
    Board upon the grounds that neither the Austin State School
    Farm Colony nor the State Dairy and Hog Farm has any legal stat-
    us as a State institution. It appears that the sole authority
    for the creation and maintenance of both the Austin State School
    Farm Colony and the State Dairy and Hog Farm is to be found in
    the items contained in the appropriation bills referred to above.
    It is a well recognized principle of law that general legisla-
    tion enacted in a general appropriation bill by rider or other-
    wise does not have the force and effect of law and is a nullity.
    Article III, Section 35, Constitution of Texas; Moore v. Shep-
    u,    
    144 Tex. 537
    , 
    192 S.W.2d 559
    (1946);Attorney General's
    Opinion No. V-1254, August 25, 1951; Attorney General's Opin-
    ion No. WW-96, April 16, 1957. Therefore there is no authority
    for the creation of the Austin State School Farm Colony or the
    State Dairy and Hog Farm as independent state institutions but,
    under the very language of each of the appropriation bills re-
    ferred to above, each is a project or branch conducted as a
    part of the Austin State School under the supervision and con-
    trol of the Superintendent and General Manager of the Austin
    State School, appointed by the Board for Texas State Hospitals
    and Special Schools.
    Hon. James A. Giddings, page 3    (WW-221)
    You have requested that the following questions be
    answered:
    "1. Is the Austin State School Farm Colony
    a separate institution apart from the Austin State
    School?
    "2 . Is the Board for Texas State Hospitals
    and Special Schools authorized to employ a superin-
    tendent and business manager at the Austin State
    School Farm Colony?"
    In answer to your first question the Austin State
    School Farm Colony is not a separate institution apart from
    the Austin State School for the reasons stated above. Since
    the Austin State School Farm Colony is not a separate insti-
    tution apart from the Austin State School, the Board for Texas
    State Hospitals and Special Schools is not authorized to em-
    ploy a Superintendent and Business Manager for the Austin State
    School Farm Colony under the provisions of Section 10, Article
    317"b, V.C.S., and Articles 3175-3178, inclusive, with the pow-
    ers and duties set out therein, and the answer to your second
    question is rlN~rte
    In this connection the validity of all appropriations
    to the Austin State School Farm Colony and the State Dairy and
    Hog Farm prior to 1949 has been confirmed by Set, 3 of Art,
    3174a, V.C,S.
    House Bill 133, Acts 55th Leg., 1957, ch, 38& pe
    905, has appropriated $20,000.00 for the establishment of a
    Hog Farm Revolving Fund to be used in the operation of a Hog
    Farm at Leander, Texas, which farm is to be operated on a re-
    imbursable basis to serve institutions under such rules and
    regulations as may be established by the Hospital Board, and
    which fund, togeth.erwith all receipts deposited to its credit,
    may be used to pay salaries, purchase supplies and equipment,
    and pay such other expenses as may be necessary for the effi-
    cient operation of the Hog Farm. This appropriation is to the
    "Hospitals and Special Schools Central Office." You have re-
    quested OUT opinion as to whether the Central Office of the
    Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools is the proper
    authority to expend the sum so appropriated.
    In the appropriation of money the Legislature has the
    power to designate the amount of money to be appropriated, the
    purpose for which it is appropriated, and the proper authority
    to supervise its expenditure. The action of the Legislature in
    directing the "Central Office'Iof the Texas Board for State
    Hon. James A. Giddings, page 4     (WW-221)
    Hospitals and Special Schools to expend the appropriations for
    the purposes mentioned is not general legislation but is a
    designation of the purpose .forwhich the funds so appropriated
    are to be used and the method or means by which such moneys are
    to be expended.
    It is the opinion of this office that the $20,000.00
    appropriated to the establishment of a Hog Farm Revolving F'und
    to be used in the operation of a Hog Farm at Leander, Texas, has
    been appropriated to the Central Office of the Board for Texas
    State Hospitals and Special Schools and is to be expended by that
    branch for the purposes indicated in the appropriation bill.
    SUMMARY
    Neither the Austin State School Farm Colony nor
    the State Dairy and Hog Farm are separate institu-
    tions as a part of the Texas State Hospitals and
    Special Schools, but are projects or branches of the
    Austin State School. The Board for Texas State Hos-
    pitals and Special Schools is not authorized to em-
    ploy a Superintendent and Business Manager for the
    Austin State School Farm Colony under the provisions
    of Section 10, Article 3174b, V.A.C.S,, and Articles
    3175-3178, inclusive, with the powers and duties set
    out therein. The sum of $20,000.00 appropriated for
    the establishment of a Hog Farm Revolving Fund to be
    used in the operation of a Hog Farm at Leander Texas,
    by House Bill 133, Acts 55th Leg., 1957, ch. 385, pa
    905, is under the control of and to be expended by
    the Central Office of the Board for Texas State Hos-
    pitals and Special Schools.
    Very truly yours,
    WILL WILSON
    Attorney General of Texas
    C. K. Richards
    CKR:wb                             Assistant
    Hon. James A. Giddings, page 5   (WW-221)
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    H. Grady Chandler, Chairman
    John Reeves
    Jack Goodman
    REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    BY:         Beo. P. Blackburn
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-221

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1957

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017