-
Honorable Wm. J. Burke Opinion No. ww-192 Executive Director State Board of Control Re: Questions concerning bid llst- Austin, Texas lng, bid fee, bids and con- tracts with political subdivi- Dear Sir.: sions below State level. Your request for an opinion reads as follows: “In reviewing bid lists it has just come to my attention that Gregg County, Texas, owns and operates an asphalt plant and that under date of December 10, 1956, Gregg County asphalt Plant, through Mr. W. R. Scrogglns, Gregg County Rngi- neer, filed an application for listing as a bidder to supply the State with asphaltlc concrete. llSlnce Gregg County is a political subdivi- sion and might at any time in the future submit an apparent low and acceptable bid, we need your opinion on the following points at your earliest convenience : “1) Can political subdivLsLons below the State level (such as counties, cities, towns, etc.) apply for listing on State bid invitation lists for any commodity7 “2) Can the Board of Control accept the ap- plication and the class and item booklet fee identi- fying commodities on which bids may be submitted from such political subdivision? If such lesser political “3) subdivision should submit a bid and it is a low bid, can the Board of Control make an award on the bid?” iirtlcle 634a, Vernon’s Civil Statutes provides as fol- lows: “Sec. 1. The Board of Control shall In all public contracts to be let or awarded by it invite Honorable Vm. J. Burke, page 2 W-192) bids and furnish proposals to those desirous of bidding on such forms as it may deem proper. Said Board may place any person, firm or cor- poration so desiring on a State mailing list which said list shall entitle said holder to a copy of the proposal on any contract that is to be let. To be entitled to receive such State mailing list, said holder shall first pay in ad- vance an annual service charge, to be determined by the Board of Control which same shall not be less than Five (jT.Ob) Dollars nor more than Seven Dollars and Fifty ($7.50) Cents. Sec. 2. Where any bidder or prospective bidder, other than those appearing on said State mailing list, desires to bid on any contract to be let by said ijoard, he shall pay such amount for the proposal or proposals furnished to him, ds said Board may determine is just and neces- sary; provided, huMever, in the event said Board finds that a service charge may work a hardship on some particular bidder or class of bidders, it may forego such charge and shall be author- ized to furnish such proposals. “Sec. 3. All amounts collected from the annual service charge of those on the State mail- ing list or from proposals furnished shall be deposited in the State Treasury, in the name of the ‘State board of ,Control Special Service Ac- count’, and enough of s;:id funds so collected shall be used by said Doard and paid out as other funds are to. defray all necessary expenses and charges in connection with the making and furn- ishing of said proposals.n The above quoted provisions will be repealed on the effective date of Senate Bill 169, .-icts of the 55th Legislature. Subdivision (b) oi Section 8 of Senate Bill 189~provides that the Board of Control shall maintain a bidders’ list. It is to be noted that under neither the provisions of Article 634a nor the provisions of Senate Bill 18.9, would the State board of Control be prohibited from awarding contracts to a county. How- ever, since the Board of Control is required under both Acts to determine the capacity of a prospective bidder to perform the contract as awarded, your question necessarily involves the au- thority of the Commissioners * Court of Gregg County to furnish asphaltic concrete to the State of Texas if it is a successful bidder on a purchase contract.. Honorable Wm. J. Burke, page 3 (WW-192) The Commissioners’ Court is a court of limited jur- isdiction end has only such powers as are conferred upon it by express terms or by necessary implication. Childress Countv v. State,
127 Tex. 343,
92 S.W.2d 1011(1936); Von Rosenbera v. Lovett 173 S.U. 508 (Tex.Civ.ipp. 1915, error ref.); &&&,
380 S.W. 289(Tex.Civ.ipp. 1925); Hill v. S.W.2d 766 (Tex.Civ.App. 1952, error ref. n.r.e.1. ‘.ie know of no’ provisions which would authorize the County to enter into contracts with the State, whereby the County is to furnish the State with concrete asphalt. It is further our opinion that such contract is not the performance of a gov- ernmental function necessary to county business. In this con- nection, it is the duty of the Commissioners Court, the engi- neers, and those in charge of road building projects of Gregg County to reasonably anticipate the amount of asphalt and other material needed for road building projects. If, by reason of unforeseen circumstances there should remain surplus material after projects are completed, then the surplus could be sold by Gregg County. However, Gregg County cannot engage in the as- phalt business. If Gregg County were to attempt to engage in the asphalt or the road building business, then it would be en- gaging in proprietary functions not authorized. See Miller v. Zl Paso County
136 Tex. 370,
150 S.W.2d 1000(1941); Bennett v. Eirown Count; I$ater Control and Imorovement District Ro. l.,
153 Tex. 599, 275 5.X.2d 498 (1954);holding that a county can perform only governmental functions. To the same effect see Attorney General’s Opinions S-55 (1953) and v-763 (1949). You are, therefore, advised that the application for listin,- as a bidder to supply the State with asphalt concrete submitted by the Gregg County bsphalt Plant, acting by and through the Gregg County dnginee,r, cannot be honored by the State 3o:ird of Control. Gregg County does hot have authority to enter into supply contracts with the State of Texas where- by it will furnish the State with asphaltic con- Crete. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON &torney General of Texas JR:pf:wb $?5Zev~ Assistant Fr” 2 -F)* Honorable Wm. J. Burke, page 4 (W&192) APPROVdD: OPINION COMMITTB 3. Grady Chandler, Chairman _I iz. Richards L. john Lennan Marvin Thomas BY: Geo. P. BlacKLurn
Document Info
Docket Number: WW-192
Judges: Will Wilson
Filed Date: 7/2/1957
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017