Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1957 )


Menu:
  • .   1
    Maroh   29,1957
    Honorable Dawson Bryant            Opinion NO. ``-81
    County Attorney
    Kent County                        Re:.The issuance and legal
    Jayton, Texas                          obligatibn of.time~uar-
    rants by Jayton.Rural
    High School District
    7:; Arty.2786(e),
    Dear Mr. Bryant:                        . . .
    You request the opinion of this office+pon..the
    questions presented in your letter, as follows:,
    "At.the beginning of the current.school
    ye+- beginning on.September,l, 1956, ok,
    sho+ry th.ereafter,the Jay$on..Ru&?al..Hig&
    School"Distrrcthad just'komplete'd  ~&``nbu:'~
    gch?oJ,,p&antconsisting.,of.a.new~.grade
    ~'-schodl,high school; auditorium and gym:,
    " -:iI+stnm.:'.~Th&
    school district was.in needjof.~
    '~?kquir$&nt fdr.the .varlousschoolrooms,be&
    and lu,nchroomin order that classes~could'~,'
    ,be,soperly:.conducted during. the pt?esentL.
    j‘.~iml~iiO$
    year; The“school,had,enougR.,furids.,~
    ' @i+vould':ti@celire
    .enou&availab)e findb
    .:
    <..``~asP"'dourdea~:during,~the 'pew.tb.'h*_'aJa,,
    teacher````~&~+lL;i;,
    ;~'iaainte~nceiar;a``~o````.,.
    -: ,,_
    tiop,,q,Lth-+,sma~lsurplus.leftovqr.;  ,hov- '.
    everi“the::,school,districtid~d~not.~sue.enough
    fund~':'&~'of-:curyent
    available,fundb.to..pu$+
    chase.``~fie-'xiece'ssary
    equipment Andyto eqtiip;;:~
    scho6l.propertyr``The:Board'ofTrus$ees'order-
    .edthe :necessary,equipment  durlng.the prehent
    schoo& yeaT with~the intention of borrowing
    ~ki6ney;by:'ibsuing
    'time-warrents to,pay for s&e,
    ,Such.tqultient,cost wellover the sum.of:'
    #25,000.00. Upon receiving the equipment in'
    September and October of 1956, instead of is-
    suing time-warrants to obtain thenfunds.neces-
    sary for such purpose which warrants would
    have been dravlng interest, the Board of Trus-
    tees paid for such equipment out of available
    Honorable Dawson Bryant, page 2 (``-81)
    funds with the intention of ls~ulng the
    time-warrants later in the school year
    when the need arose for the money. NOW
    the school is ln need of funds to replace
    that which was speriton the equipment and
    they now desire to issue interest-bearing
    time warrants in the amount of $25,000.00.
    "1. Can the Jayton Rural High School DEB-
    trict issue interest-bearing time warrants
    under Article 2786e Texas Revised Civil
    Statutes under the above circumstances?
    "2. Would such time warrants be a legal
    obligation of such School District?"
    "interest-bear1 time warrant" is de-
    fined in Se%o?imof    Article ~2786(3, V.C.S., as being a
    "p-omlssory note, interest-bearing time warrant, obllga-
    tlon or other evidence of indebtedness issued under this
    Act," and the statute authorizes payment of the warrants with
    tax moneys to be levied and collected in future years.
    It 1s clear that neither bonds nor warrants may be
    issued for any purpose not authorized by 6tatutory or consti-
    tftutbnal provlslons, the leading case on the subject being
    Lasater +. Lopez, 
    110 Tex. 179
    , 
    217 S.W. 373
    .
    In effect, it 1s proposed to replenish the "current
    available funds" of the dl&rlCt  by the Issuance of time war-
    rants. Such a    rpose 1s clearly not one of those enumerated
    in Article 2786p"~
    e), V.C.S., which are as follows:
    11     to repair and renovate school bulld-
    l&;'purchase   school buildings and school
    equlpment; to equip school properties with
    necessary heating, water, sanitary, lunch-
    room and electric facilities; . . ."
    Issuance of time warrants for the purpose stated is
    not authorized by Article 2786(e), V.C.S., and If they were
    Issued they would be void.
    Honorable Dawson Bryant, page 3 (``-81)
    Under Article 2786(e~), V.C.S., time war-
    rants may not be legally issued by a
    school district for the purpose of re-
    plenishing the "current available funds"
    of the district, and, if ISsued, would
    not be legal obligations of the district.
    Very truly yours,
    WILL WILSON
    Attorney Cjeneral
    Byk"+
    Howard W. May8
    Assistant
    HUM-s
    APPROVED:
    OPINION CiMMITTEE
    By: H. Grady Chandler, Chairman
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-81

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1957

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017