Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1957 )


Menu:
  •              .      . .
    April   15, 1957
    Hon. J. 0. Duncan                         ww-95
    District-County   142 Tex.     651
    , 
    180 S.W.2d 435
    (1944).          If we be correct       in our
    assumption      that the 1956 will revoked        the 1953 will in the manner
    prescribed      by the statute,    then we can put aside the 1953 will with-
    out further     notice.
    This brings    us to the consideration          of the subsequent     or
    the 1956 will which we assume            was in writing       and executed     with the
    necessary    statutory   prerequisites       to make it a valid will.         We
    assume    that the 1956 will bequeathed           the entire    estate,   both real and
    personal,   to the wife without       limitation    or remainder        to anyone.   If
    this be true, the bequest       lapsed upon the death of the wlfe prior              to
    the death of the husband, the testator.              Logan v. Thomason,         
    146 Tex. 37
    , 
    202 S.W.2d 212
    (1947).          Thea in that event the husband died
    intestate  and his property       would descend        according    to the law of
    descent   and distribution    as provided        in V.A.T.S.     Probate    Code, 338.
    You state in your letter         that the testator    died “without
    issue *.     We assume      that you mean by this “without           children”,        Died
    ‘?without issue”      is not the same as saying          &died without      heirs”.
    Only if the testator      died without      living heirs     is his estate     subject     to
    escheat.       We are not justified      in concluding     from your letter         that the
    testator     died without    heirs,  even though he died without           leaving
    brothers      and sisters    or children.       The foregoing     constitutes     the most
    satisfactory      answer  we can give you in the absence             of more       specific
    information.
    s UMMARY
    A prior      will may be revoked            only by the
    execution      of a subsequent         will or declara-
    tion in writing      executed      with the same
    formalities      or by destroying          or canceling
    the same or causing          it to be done in the
    presence     of the maker.          If the sole
    beneficiary      of an estate      under a will,
    without     any qualification,      limitation     or
    remainder,      dies prior     to the test&or,
    such an estate       lapses,    resulting      in the
    testator    dying intestate      and the estate
    Hon.     3. 0.    Duncan,      page   3 (WW-95)
    passes     under the law of descent
    and distribution      as, provided      in
    V.A.T.S.     Probate     Code, 838.
    Property     of a person      who dies
    intestate,    leaving   no living    heirs
    is subject     to es&eat.      Articles
    7272-3289,      Vernon’s    Civil Statutes.
    Very     truly   yours,
    WILL     WILSON
    Attorney    General
    Assistant
    LPL:cs
    APPROVED:
    OPINION          COMMITTEE
    H. Grady         Chandler,     Chairman
    Arthur     Sandlin
    Richard     Stone
    B. H.     Timmins,       Jr.
    REVIEWED    FOR THE ATTORNEY                       GENERAL
    BY:
    Geo. P. Blackburn
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-95

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1957

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017