Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1952 )


Menu:
  • PRICE  DANIEL
    ATTORNEYCE:NERAL
    September 19,      1952
    Hon. J. W. Simpson, Jr.       Opinion No. V-1524
    District Attorney
    Conroe, Texas                 Re :     Legality    of assisting
    a voter in preparing
    his ballot when the
    prospective    voter can-
    Dear Sir:                              not read or write.
    You have requested      an opinion   on the fol-
    lowing    question:
    Van any assistance  be given a
    voter in preparing his ballot where
    the prospective  voter cannot read or
    writmti
    We understand your question to refer to
    illiterate   persons and not to persons who cannot read
    or write because of soae bodily infirmity.         Section 1
    of Article   VI, Constitution      of Texas and Section 33
    of the fiection    Code enumerate the c z asses of persons
    who are disqualified      to vote.    Under these constitu-
    tional and statutory     provisions,    illiteracy Is not
    msae a disqualification      to voting.
    
    147 S.W. 649
    (Tex.Clv.App.       1912).     H-is
    no constitutional     requirement that llllter&e     voters
    be given assistance     In marking their ballots.
    Statutory provlslon      for assistance to voter0
    is found in Section 95 of the        Election Code.  This sec-
    tion originated    as Section 82     of the Terre11 election
    Law (Acts 29th Leg,, 1st C.S.        1905, ch. 11, pe 520).
    As originally    enacted it read:
    “Not more then one person at the
    same time shall be permitted to occupy
    any one compartment, voting booth or
    place prepared for a voter, except when
    a voter Is unable to prepare his ballot
    from inability   to read or write, or phys-
    ical aisabllity,   two juQes or an inter-
    preter    if he can not both reed end
    speak &he Bngllsh language, #hall arsist
    .
    Hon. J. W. Simpson,                  Jr.,   page 2   (v-1524)
    him, they having been frrst  sworn that
    they will not suggest by word or sign
    or gesture how the voter shall vote*
    that they shall confine their assisi-
    anoe to answering his questions      to
    naming candidates   and the poliilcal
    parties to which ihey belong, ena that
    they will prepare his ballot as the
    voter himself shall direct.    . . .!I
    The section    codified as Article 3003 me-
    vised           Civil        Statutes i911, was amended in I918 fActs
    y t,F o ;;t:         l 9
    4th’C.S.   1918, ch. 30, p. 54) to read as
    :
    “Not more than one person at the
    same tilne shall be permitted to occupy
    any one compartment, voting booth or
    place prepared for a voter, nor shall
    any assistance    be given a voter In pre-
    paring his ballot,     except when a voter
    Is unable to prepare the same himself
    because of some bodily infirmity,       such
    as renders him physically      unable to
    write,    or is over sixty years of age,
    or has been a citizen      of the united
    States for 21 years and is unable to
    read and write,    in ,which cases two
    judges of such election      shall assist
    him , . .; and where any assistance       is
    rendered any voter In preparing his
    ballot,    other than the class herein ex-*
    cepted, the ballot of such voter shall
    not be.counted.     . . .I’
    It was again amended In 1919 (Acts   36th Leg.,
    B.S. 1919,                  ch. 55, p. 94) so as to read:
    “Not more than one person at the
    same time shall be permitted to occupy
    any one ,compertment, voting booth or
    place prepared for a voter, nor shall
    any assistance   be given a voter in pre-
    paring his ballot,   except when a voter
    is unable to prepare the same himself
    because of some bodily infirmity,,   such
    as renders him physically   unable to
    write,   or is over sixty years of age
    and Is unable to read and write, In
    ,
    Hon. J. W. Simpson, Jr.,     page 3    (v-1524)
    which case two judges of such election
    shall assist him . . .; and where any
    assistance  Is rendered In preparing a
    ballot other ttian as herein allowed
    the ballot  shall not be counted, bui
    shall be void for all purposes.    . . .I’ .
    Under this amendment It was held In State v.
    Johnston, 
    238 S.W.2d 957
    (Tex.Sup. 19511, that assist-
    ance to voters under 60 years of age because they
    could not read or write or because they were “not edu-
    cated” was Illegal.   Attorney General’s Opinion v-643
    (1948) held that ttelectlon  judges are not required or’ .
    permitted to mark or assist in marking the ballot of a
    person between the ages of 21 and 60 years, though such
    person be unable to mark his ballot because of llllter-
    aoy. I1
    Finally, the statute was further amended
    when it was carried into its present form from Article
    3010, Revised Civil Statutes 1925, as Section 95 of
    the Zlectlon   Code. It now reads:
    “Not more than one person at the
    game tine shall be permitted to occupy
    any one compartment, *voting booth- or
    place prepared for a voter, gor shall
    him . . . Where any assistance   is ren-
    dered In preparing a ballot other than
    as herein allowed, the ballot  shall not
    be counted, but shell be void for all
    purposes*   . . .I* (Emphasis added.)
    The effect   of each successive    amendment of
    the statute has been to restrict      assistance    to voters.
    Under the orlglnal     enactment in 1905 all voters who
    were unable to read or write were en t ltlea to essist-
    ante In marking their ballots.      From 1919 ur$il the
    effeotlve   date of the Texas Election Code on ~January
    1 1952, Illiteracy      was a ground for assistance     only
    where the voter was over 60 years old.         Section 95 of
    the Election Code deleted the provision        for assistance
    Hon. J. W. Simpson, Jr.,      page 4   (V-1524)
    to voters over 60 years of age who were unable to read
    and write.  So, under the law es It now exists,  llllter-
    loy is never a reason for rendering assistance  to a
    voter In marking his ballot.
    You have suggested In your brief that Section
    95 of the Election Code might mean that manual or physi-
    cal assistance    cannot be given an Illiterate       voter, but
    that election   officials     might read the ballot    to the
    voter and point out the Individual        canaidates in the ver-
    k:cue reoes so that the voter might know where and for
    whom to cast his vote.        We do not think such a construc-
    tion is possible.       Section 93 of the Election Code pro-
    vides that the voter upon receiving        his ballot    shall
    Immediately retire     to a voting booth..or a place prepared
    for voting and there prepare his bal-lot.        .Section 95
    prohibits   any person other than the’voter,.from       occupying
    the booth except when the voter is “unable to prepare
    the same himself because of some bodily infirmity,             such
    as renders him physically       unable to write or to see.”
    Thus It 1s seen that the statute not only prohibits             as-
    sistance to an Illiterate       voter, but also prohibits       any
    one else from being in his immediate presence while he
    Is marking his ballot.        In view of this letter    prohlbl-
    tion, it Is impossible       to give the statute the construc-
    tion you have suggested,       even if there was doubt that
    the prohibition    against assistance     to the Illiterate
    voter would not of itself       make such assistance    Illegal.
    We appreciate  the seemlng incongruity    between
    permitting en illiterate   person to caee l ballot and at
    the same time prohibiting   him from receiving   assistance
    in reading and marking the names thereon so that he may
    express his choice meaningfully.     Rouever, the wisdom
    of the law is for the consideration    of the Legislature.
    As stated in      f v Du w        
    251 S.W. 298
    301 (Tex.
    Civ.App. 1923     “whkhe:  a wlie lau or not, ‘it is the
    law end must
    Section 95 of the Eleotion Code provides that
    any ballot   on rhleh Illegal      assistance    la rendered shall
    be void.    Articles    224 and 225, Vernon’8 Penal Code, pro-
    vide that election      officer8   who render assistance     except
    as permitt8d    therein    shell be fined not less than $200
    nor more than $500 or be confined in Jail for not less
    than two nor mora than twelve months, or both.             It may be
    noted that these penal statutes          have not, been amended
    since the change in Section 95 of the Election Code ellmi-
    natlug the provision       for assistance     to voters over 60
    ,   .
    #
    Hon. J. W. Simpson, Jr.,    page 5    (v-1524)
    years of age who were unable to read and write.       A&
    though these two articles  of the Penal Code do not
    make It an offense   such assistance  Is nevertheless
    unlawful and bellois  of the assisted  voters cannot
    be counted,
    Illiteracy    ia not a aisqu@ifioe-
    tion $0 voting,    but voters who are
    unable to read or ‘write may not receive
    assistance     In marking their bellota    on
    the ground of their Illiteracy.        Sec.
    95, Texas Election Code.
    APPROVED:                             Yours very truly,
    J. C. Davis Jr*                         PRICE DANIEL
    County Affa&s’Divislon                Attorney General
    E. Jacobson
    Reviewing Assistant
    Charles D. Mathews                        Mary K. Wall
    Fir& Assistant                               Assistant
    MKM:wb
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-1524

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1952

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017