-
PRICE DANIEL ATTORNEYCE:NERAL September 19, 1952 Hon. J. W. Simpson, Jr. Opinion No. V-1524 District Attorney Conroe, Texas Re : Legality of assisting a voter in preparing his ballot when the prospective voter can- Dear Sir: not read or write. You have requested an opinion on the fol- lowing question: Van any assistance be given a voter in preparing his ballot where the prospective voter cannot read or writmti We understand your question to refer to illiterate persons and not to persons who cannot read or write because of soae bodily infirmity. Section 1 of Article VI, Constitution of Texas and Section 33 of the fiection Code enumerate the c z asses of persons who are disqualified to vote. Under these constitu- tional and statutory provisions, illiteracy Is not msae a disqualification to voting.
147 S.W. 649(Tex.Clv.App. 1912). H-is no constitutional requirement that llllter&e voters be given assistance In marking their ballots. Statutory provlslon for assistance to voter0 is found in Section 95 of the Election Code. This sec- tion originated as Section 82 of the Terre11 election Law (Acts 29th Leg,, 1st C.S. 1905, ch. 11, pe 520). As originally enacted it read: “Not more then one person at the same time shall be permitted to occupy any one compartment, voting booth or place prepared for a voter, except when a voter Is unable to prepare his ballot from inability to read or write, or phys- ical aisabllity, two juQes or an inter- preter if he can not both reed end speak &he Bngllsh language, #hall arsist . Hon. J. W. Simpson, Jr., page 2 (v-1524) him, they having been frrst sworn that they will not suggest by word or sign or gesture how the voter shall vote* that they shall confine their assisi- anoe to answering his questions to naming candidates and the poliilcal parties to which ihey belong, ena that they will prepare his ballot as the voter himself shall direct. . . .!I The section codified as Article 3003 me- vised Civil Statutes i911, was amended in I918 fActs y t,F o ;;t: l 9 4th’C.S. 1918, ch. 30, p. 54) to read as : “Not more than one person at the same tilne shall be permitted to occupy any one compartment, voting booth or place prepared for a voter, nor shall any assistance be given a voter In pre- paring his ballot, except when a voter Is unable to prepare the same himself because of some bodily infirmity, such as renders him physically unable to write, or is over sixty years of age, or has been a citizen of the united States for 21 years and is unable to read and write, in ,which cases two judges of such election shall assist him , . .; and where any assistance is rendered any voter In preparing his ballot, other than the class herein ex-* cepted, the ballot of such voter shall not be.counted. . . .I’ It was again amended In 1919 (Acts 36th Leg., B.S. 1919, ch. 55, p. 94) so as to read: “Not more than one person at the same time shall be permitted to occupy any one ,compertment, voting booth or place prepared for a voter, nor shall any assistance be given a voter in pre- paring his ballot, except when a voter is unable to prepare the same himself because of some bodily infirmity,, such as renders him physically unable to write, or is over sixty years of age and Is unable to read and write, In , Hon. J. W. Simpson, Jr., page 3 (v-1524) which case two judges of such election shall assist him . . .; and where any assistance Is rendered In preparing a ballot other ttian as herein allowed the ballot shall not be counted, bui shall be void for all purposes. . . .I’ . Under this amendment It was held In State v. Johnston,
238 S.W.2d 957(Tex.Sup. 19511, that assist- ance to voters under 60 years of age because they could not read or write or because they were “not edu- cated” was Illegal. Attorney General’s Opinion v-643 (1948) held that ttelectlon judges are not required or’ . permitted to mark or assist in marking the ballot of a person between the ages of 21 and 60 years, though such person be unable to mark his ballot because of llllter- aoy. I1 Finally, the statute was further amended when it was carried into its present form from Article 3010, Revised Civil Statutes 1925, as Section 95 of the Zlectlon Code. It now reads: “Not more than one person at the game tine shall be permitted to occupy any one compartment, *voting booth- or place prepared for a voter, gor shall him . . . Where any assistance is ren- dered In preparing a ballot other than as herein allowed, the ballot shall not be counted, but shell be void for all purposes* . . .I* (Emphasis added.) The effect of each successive amendment of the statute has been to restrict assistance to voters. Under the orlglnal enactment in 1905 all voters who were unable to read or write were en t ltlea to essist- ante In marking their ballots. From 1919 ur$il the effeotlve date of the Texas Election Code on ~January 1 1952, Illiteracy was a ground for assistance only where the voter was over 60 years old. Section 95 of the Election Code deleted the provision for assistance Hon. J. W. Simpson, Jr., page 4 (V-1524) to voters over 60 years of age who were unable to read and write. So, under the law es It now exists, llllter- loy is never a reason for rendering assistance to a voter In marking his ballot. You have suggested In your brief that Section 95 of the Election Code might mean that manual or physi- cal assistance cannot be given an Illiterate voter, but that election officials might read the ballot to the voter and point out the Individual canaidates in the ver- k:cue reoes so that the voter might know where and for whom to cast his vote. We do not think such a construc- tion is possible. Section 93 of the Election Code pro- vides that the voter upon receiving his ballot shall Immediately retire to a voting booth..or a place prepared for voting and there prepare his bal-lot. .Section 95 prohibits any person other than the’voter,.from occupying the booth except when the voter is “unable to prepare the same himself because of some bodily infirmity, such as renders him physically unable to write or to see.” Thus It 1s seen that the statute not only prohibits as- sistance to an Illiterate voter, but also prohibits any one else from being in his immediate presence while he Is marking his ballot. In view of this letter prohlbl- tion, it Is impossible to give the statute the construc- tion you have suggested, even if there was doubt that the prohibition against assistance to the Illiterate voter would not of itself make such assistance Illegal. We appreciate the seemlng incongruity between permitting en illiterate person to caee l ballot and at the same time prohibiting him from receiving assistance in reading and marking the names thereon so that he may express his choice meaningfully. Rouever, the wisdom of the law is for the consideration of the Legislature. As stated in f v Du w
251 S.W. 298301 (Tex. Civ.App. 1923 “whkhe: a wlie lau or not, ‘it is the law end must Section 95 of the Eleotion Code provides that any ballot on rhleh Illegal assistance la rendered shall be void. Articles 224 and 225, Vernon’8 Penal Code, pro- vide that election officer8 who render assistance except as permitt8d therein shell be fined not less than $200 nor more than $500 or be confined in Jail for not less than two nor mora than twelve months, or both. It may be noted that these penal statutes have not, been amended since the change in Section 95 of the Election Code ellmi- natlug the provision for assistance to voters over 60 , . # Hon. J. W. Simpson, Jr., page 5 (v-1524) years of age who were unable to read and write. A& though these two articles of the Penal Code do not make It an offense such assistance Is nevertheless unlawful and bellois of the assisted voters cannot be counted, Illiteracy ia not a aisqu@ifioe- tion $0 voting, but voters who are unable to read or ‘write may not receive assistance In marking their bellota on the ground of their Illiteracy. Sec. 95, Texas Election Code. APPROVED: Yours very truly, J. C. Davis Jr* PRICE DANIEL County Affa&s’Divislon Attorney General E. Jacobson Reviewing Assistant Charles D. Mathews Mary K. Wall Fir& Assistant Assistant MKM:wb
Document Info
Docket Number: V-1524
Judges: Price Daniel
Filed Date: 7/2/1952
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017