-
. . Hon. R. L. Whitehead Opinion No. V-1411 Criminal District Attorney Longview, Texas Re: Allowing a person to make bond following Attention: Hon.'Paul Painter arrest for a violation Assistant 'of probation .underthe Adult Probation and Parole Law pending Dear Sir: final decision. We quote from your letter asking for an opin- ion of this office as follows: '!Wewould like to know.~ifa person who has been found guilty of a felony and.given. a probated'sentence Is entitled to bond; eat any time after he has been arrested under the,provislonsof Sec. 5, Art. 81B, c.c.P-., (Adult'Probation and Parole Law1 for vlola- tion of the terms of his probation. More speclfically,would a person convicted of a felony, probated under the Adult Probation and:Parole'Law,arrested as provided by said 1aw;for violating the'terms'of sa'ld'proba- tlon, and evidence produced for the revoca- tion of said probation, be entitled to bond when and while the Court took the matter un- der advisement before.renderinghis decision?" The Adult Probation and Parole Law, Article 781b, Vernon's Code of Criminal Procedure, Is intended to supplement the existing procedures and facilities for punishment and rehabilitation of persons convicted of crime. It makes provision for persons convicted of certain offenses to be released on probationby the Court, under proper supervision and under conditions prescribed by the Court. The'conditions of the probation are within the discretion of the Court. We quote from Article 781b as follows: . . Hon. R. L. Whltehead, page 2 (V-1411) , "Section 1. The courts of the State of Texas having original jurisdictionof crlm- inal actions, when it shall appear to the satisfaction of the court that the ends of justice and the best Interests of the public as well as the defendant will be'subserved thereby, shall have the power, after convic: tlon or a plea of guilty for any crime or of- fense except murder, rape, and offenses against morals, decency, and chastity where thenmaxl- mum punishment assessed the defendant does not exceed ten (10) years Imprisonment,and where the defendant has not been previously convicted_ofa felony, to,suspend the imposi- tion or the execution of sentence and may place the defendant on probation for the max- imum period of the sentence imposed or If no sentence has been Imposed for the maximum . period for which the defendant might have been sentenced, or Impose a fine applicable to the offense committed and also place the defendant on probation as hereinafter provided, Any such person placed on probation shall be under the supervision of such court and a pro- bation and parole officer serving such court as hereinafter provided. “Sec. 3. Such court shall determine the terms .andconditions of probation and may at any time during the period of probation alter or modify the conditions . . . "Sec. 4. The period of probation shall be determined by such courts and may at any time be modified or terminated by such courts. . . . . “Sec. 5. At any time during the period of probation such courts may Issue a warrant for violation of any of the conditions of the probation and cause the defendant to be arrested. Any probation and parole officer, police offi- cer or other officer with power of arrest may arrest such defendantwithout a warrant upon the request of the judge of such courts. A pro- bationer so arrested x be detained in the county jail or other appropriate place of de- tention until he can be taken before the court. - . Hon. R. L. Whitehead, page 3 (V-1411) Such probation and parole officer shall forth- with report such arrest and detention to such courts and submit in writing a report showing in what manner the probationer has violated his probation. Thereupon, the court shall cause the defendant to be brought before It and; after a hearing without a jury, s contlnue.or revoke the probation and shall In such case proceed to deal with the case as if there had been no pro-.- bation. . . . When he is notified that his pro- bation is revoked for violation of the condl- tlons of probation and he Is called on to serve a jail or penitentiary sentence he ma appeal the revocation." (Emphasis supplied.3 In Wilson v. State,
240 S.W.2d 774(Tex.,Crim. 1951)~,a case Involving the right of a convict to a jury In a hearing on revocation of probation, the Court stated: "When a court extends clemency under the statute, the relationship existing is, in a way, contractual -- that is, the court agrees with the convict that clemency by way of pro- bation will be extended if he will keep and : perform certain requirements and conditions, the violation of which will authorize the revocation of,the probation. In this partic- ular, there exists the similarity existing in conditional pardons. "The convict surrenders no right, privi- lege, or conslderatlonfor the clemency ex- tended. In accepting the clemency, he does so under the conditions upon which It is ex- . tended. Obviously, therefore, the proceeding to revoke probation is not a trial, as that term is used and contemplatedby the Constitu- tion in reference to~crlminal cases, and Is not ; ;;;;;e$ing required to be conducted as such . Eased upon the holding of the Court in the above case, it Is our opinion that until the time of an actual revocation of probation by the Court the disposition of the probationer Is entirely within the Court's sound dls- cretlon. We agree with you that the probationer has no absolute right to a bond, but the Court may under its au- release authorize a bond if it SO thority to provide the terms and conditions of the person's desires. i 1. I Hon. R. L. Whitehead, page 4 (V-1411) SUMMARY Persons arrested for violation of proba- tions under Article 781b, V.C.C.P., do not have the right to make bond pending determin- ation by the Court as to a revocation of the probation, but the Court may, In its dlscre- tion, permit the probationer to make bond. APPROVED: ,. Yours very truly, PRICE DAXIEL Attorney General E. Jacobson Reviewing Assistant BY Charles D. Mathews Ned McDaniel First Assistant Assistant riMc:jmc .
Document Info
Docket Number: V-1411
Judges: Price Daniel
Filed Date: 7/2/1952
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017