Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1951 )


Menu:
  •                         July 24, 1951
    Has. Bettye 0. Bomer         Opinion lVo.V-1216
    ~Couuty Budltor
    maand count.*                Re: PresetitmaxImum salary
    Midland, Taxas                   of the County Treasur-
    er of Midlana County.
    DearMadam:
    Your-~request:fOr
    an opinion relates to the fol-
    lowing factual elttitionr
    lWUand County haU a population of less than
    " .Inas``~::~a.~dia,countshae..a.populatlon in
    excecm of 2O;OOO ~Whablt&nts,.its~'countg
    treasurer must
    be oompensated m.a salmy basis.. Tex. Cow&; Art. XVI.
    Sec.~.6l. #eot+xi ~13,~:of
    ‘,Aptlcle 3912e, V,C.S., 1s con-
    trollingaa tb'theaompeiisatiou   to,be p+d the treasurer
    and provides in part as follows:
    “The CoarmissionerslCourt Is counties
    havlug a populatiau of twenty thousaM (20,,-
    OOO).lnhab~tantsormore, and l&e than,me
    hundred and ninety thousand (lg,O,OOO)Inhabit-
    ants according,to the $ast preceding Federal
    Census, Is hereby authorleed and it shall be
    its duty to fix the salaries of all~,thefol-
    lowing~namedofficers, to-titi ; . . fmasur-
    Each 'ofsaid officers shall be pala
    E'&&*an     anuual salary in twelve (12) equal
    Installments of not less than the total sum
    earned'as compeqsationby him in his official
    capacity for the flacal year 1935, and not
    .   .
    Hon. Nettye C. Rcmer, page 2   (V-1216)
    more than the maximum amount allowed such of-
    ficer under laws existing on August 24, 1935;
    provided that in counties having a population
    of twenty thousand (20,000)and less than
    thirty-seventhousand five hundred (37,500)
    according to the last precedingFederal Cen-
    sus, and having an assessed valuation In
    excess of Fifteen Million   (~15,000,000.00)
    Dollars, according to the last approved pre-
    ceding tax roll of such county the maximum
    amount allowed such officers as salaries may
    be In&eased one (1s) r cent for each One
    Million ($1,000,000.00  $ Dollars valuation or
    fractionalpart thereof, lnexcess of said
    Fifteen Million ($15,000,000.00)Dollars val-
    uation over and above the maximum amount al-
    loved such officers under laws existing on
    August 24, 1935; . . e
    'I. . .
    "(e)  The Cammissioners-Court is hereby
    authorized,when in theirsjudgment the finan-
    cial condition of the county and the.needs
    of the officers justify the increase, to enter
    an order Increasing the compensationof the
    precinct, county and district officers in an
    tidditionalamount not to exceed.twenty-five
    (25%) per cent of the sum allowed under the
    lav for the fiscal year of 1944, provided the
    total compensationauthorleed.underthe lav
    for the fiscal year of 1944 did not aceed the
    cum of Tblrty-six Hundred ($3600.00)Dollars."
    In a letter addressed to lion.B. E. Grlabam,
    District Attorney, Fastland,Texas, dated November 24,
    1947, this office stated:
    *It is our opinion.thatthe county treas-
    urer of Eastland County could have received In
    1947 a maximum ccnnpensationof~$2625.00,de-
    termined as follows:
    *In 1935 the maximum compensatioqwas
    (Article3943 V.C.S.) Based on
    ~,'~,"k~"~aluationin 1945 ($19 575 780.00)
    the ConmcLssionerslCourt of R&a&     County
    could have granted the count treasurer an
    Increase in 1944 of $100.00 t'
    5s of $2,000.00).
    Hon. Nettge 0. Romer, page 3   (V-1216)
    Under the provisions of Subdivision (e) of
    Section 13, Article 3912e, the Commissioners'
    Court could have ranted in 1947 an addition-
    al increase of 252 of the maximum allowed the
    treasurer under the law in 1944, or $525.00.
    (25% of $2100.00) Since Eastland County had
    an assessed valuation in 1946 of $19,07~,010.00,
    the county treasurer could receive an increase
    based on the assessed valuation of 5s of the
    maximum allowed on August 24, 1935, or $100.00.
    (5s of $2,000.00) In 1947 the county treasurer
    of Eastlana County could receive a maximum sal-
    ary of $2,625.00. ($2,000 plus $100 plus $525)."
    By the same token, the maximum compensational-
    lowed under the law for the County Treasurer of Midland
    County in 1935 was $2,000.00. (Art. 3943, V.C.S.) Since
    the assessed valuation of Midland County in 1943 was $7,-
    852,018.00, the commissioners'court was not authorized
    to grant an increase based upon valuation. Art. 39120,
    Sec. 15, V.C.S. Therefore, the maximum ccmpensationof
    the county treasurer was $2,000.00 in 1944.
    Under the provisions of subdivision (e) of Sec-
    tion 13 of Article 3912e, V.C.S., the comlssionersl court
    is authorized to grant an.aadit1onalincrease of twenty-
    five per cent of the maximum allowed the treasurer under
    the law in 1944, or $500.00 (25s of $2,000.00). Pursuant
    to the provisions of-'Article.39128, V.C.S., the commission-
    ers ' court is authorized to grant an increase of twenty-
    five percent of $5400.00 (vhlch amount could have been
    paid In 1948, Art. 3912e-12, V.C.S.), or $1350.00. Att'y
    Gen. Op. V-1140 (1951).
    In addition to the sums enumerated above, the
    commissioners1court would be authorized to increase such
    amounts by two per cent of the amount allowed in 1935,
    based upon the assessed valuation of $16,200,440.00,that
    Is, 2s of'$2000.00,or $40.00 (Art. 3912e). This amount,
    together with the amount allowed under Section 13 of Ar-
    ticle 3912e and Article 3912g, authorizes a maximum compen-
    sation of 3890.00 for the Count Treasurer of Midland
    county. ($2,000 plus $500 plus $1350 plus $40.)
    In this connection,you are referred to the pro-
    visions of House Bill 265, Acts 52nU Leg., 1951, relating
    to the compensation of county treasurers. This act be-
    comes effective September 7, 1951, having failed to receive
    a record vote in the Senate. Ralbert v. San Saba Springs
    .
    Hon. Hettye C. Romer, page 4       (V-1216)
    Bond and Livestock Ass'n, 
    89 Tex. 230
    , 34 S-W. 639 (1896);
    Caplee v. Cole, 
    129 Tex. 370
    ,.102 S.W.2d 173 (1937). Sec-
    tion 2 of House Bill.265 proVide8:
    'In each county in the State of Tex-
    as having a population of at least tventy
    thousand 20 000 and not more than fifty
    thousand ~50'000] inhabitantsaccording
    to the last beceding Federal Census the*
    Commlsslo~eraCourt shall fix the sa&y
    of the county treasurer at any reasonable
    sum, providing such salary is not less
    than Two Thousand, Four Hundred Dollars
    ($2,400) per annum.!
    The above quoted provision is applicable to
    widland Couuty and, after September 7, 1951, the copDpIs-
    slonerst.court of the county is authorized to fix the
    salary of the county treasurer in accordance therevith.
    SUMMARY
    The present maximum compensationof
    the County Treasurer of Midland County is
    $3890.00 under the provisions of Articles
    3912e, Sec. 13 and 3912g,.V.C.S.
    The msxim~ccmpeusatlon that may be
    allowed the county treasurer after Septem-
    ber 7, 1951, ,theeffective date of House
    Bill 265, Acts 52na Leg., 1951, w&l1 be
    any reasonable sum fixed by the comis-
    sioners' court, provided it shall not be
    less than $2,400.00 per anuum.
    APPROVRDz                              Pours very truly,
    J. C. Davis,,Jr.                         PRICE DRRIRL
    County Affairs Division                Attorney General
    Jesse P. I&on, Jr.
    Reviewing Assistant
    Charles D. Mathews                            1Waldrep
    First Assistant                               Assistant
    BW:RW
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-1216

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1951

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017