Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1951 )


Menu:
  • Hon. RamLe R. Griffin        Opinion No. V-1215
    Criminal District Attorney
    sePferson.countg             Re: Authority of the corn--
    Reaumont, Texas                  mL3sloners' court to
    require monthly re-
    ports upon which to fix
    each month the compen-
    sation of Drainage Ms-
    Dear Sir:                        trlct Commissioners.
    Your request for an opinion presents the fol-
    lowing questions:
    1. Are commissionersof drainage dls-
    trlcts in Jefferson County required to make
    monthly reports and, if so, must they be un-
    der oath?
    2. 'Dosuch cannnisslonershave to make
    applicationto receive pay each month?
    AccorcUng to the 1950 Federal  census, Jefferson
    County has a population of 195,083 Inhabitants;therefore,
    Article 8161b, Vernon's Civil Statutes,~isapplicable.
    This statute, which was enacted in 1947, provides for the
    compensationof *alnage district commlsslonersin coun-
    ties of 150,000 to 350,000 population in the following
    language:
    "Sec. 7. The Ccamnissioners of &aln-
    age districts shall receive for their serv-
    ices compensationfor the time actually
    engaged in the work of their ~distrlctnot
    to exceed One Hundred and Fifty Dollars
    ($150) in any one (I) month, wh5.ch~
    compen-
    sation shall be fixed by an order of the
    ConmIssIonersCourt. The amount of such
    compensationshall be determinedupon the
    applicationtherefor in writing by the Mm-
    missioners of drainage districts~locatedin
    such counties, showing the necessity there-
    for, provided that such CommissionersCourt,
    after having heard such petitlons,maydeny
    or grant the same In whole or in part and
    .
    Hon. Ramie H. Griffin, page 2   (V-1215)
    shall enter their written order in the
    premises fixing the amount of such compen-
    sation Within the limits aforesaid."
    Section 9 of Article 8161b provides that "any
    laws conflictingwith the provisions of tNs Act to the
    extent and only to the extent of suchconflictare here-
    by repealed."
    Article 8120, V.C.S., as last amended in 1935,
    also deals with the compensationof drainage district
    commissionersand prescribes the method of payment as
    follows:
    "The Conmissionersof Drainage Ms-
    tricts shall receive for their servicea not
    more than Two and 5O/lOO Dollars ($2.50)
    per day for the time actually engaged in
    the work of their district, which compen-
    sation shall be fixed by an order of the
    Commissioners'Court. Before the accounts
    of such Commissionersshall be approved by
    the Commissioners'Court such Commission-
    ers shall first submit a detailed report in
    writing, under oath, to the Commissioners
    Court of their County showing the time ac-
    tually consumed in the work for said Dis-
    trict, and describing the work done, and
    such reports shall be audited and allowed
    by the Commissioners1Court in such amount
    as it may determine; . . .'
    It is settled law that statutes will be con-
    strued so as to carry out the legislativeintent. 2
    Sutherland,Statutory Construction (3rd ed. 1943) 333,
    Sec. 4701; 50 Am. Jur. 200, Statutes, Sec. 223. Further-
    more, the presumptionsexist that the Legislatureknew
    of existing statutes and the effect thereof and that
    subsequent legislationdoes not repeal the existing law
    in the absence of that expressed intent. 1 Sutherland,
    Statutory Construction (3rd ed. 1943) 461, Sec. 2012;
    Conley v. Daughters of the Reoublic 
    106 Tex. 80
    1 6
    . . 197 (1913); scoy-?.
    b     Sweatt, 
    29 Tex. 713
    (18667 .
    In 2 Sutherland,Statutory Construction (3rd ed.
    1943) 531, Sec. 5201,  it is stated:
    a     . Prior statutes relating to the
    same subject matter are to be compared with
    Hon. Ramie H. Griffin, page 3   (V-1215)
    the _-
    new provision;
    ._ and.if
    ..possible
    . . by rea-
    sonaole construction,ootn are to  oe so con-
    strued that effect Is given to every provision
    of each. . . ."
    In view of the foregoing authorities,Articles
    8120   and 8161b must be construed together.
    Clearly, by providing that the maximum compen-
    sation to commissionersof drainage districts should not
    exceed $150.00 in any one month, Article 8161b was in-
    tended to repeal the provisions of Article 8120 setting
    such maximum compensationat $2.50 per day and to author-
    ize an increase in the maximum rate of compensationwhich
    might be allowed by the commissioners'court to commis-
    sioners of draina e districts coming within the provi-
    sions of Article 8161b. Under the first sentence of
    Section 7, the rate of compensationis to be set by the
    commissioners'court, the only restrictionsbeing that
    not more than $150.00 shall be allowed to any drainage
    district commissionerin any one month and that the com-
    missioner may receive pay only for the time-actuallyen-
    gaged in the work of his district. However, under the
    second sentence the commissioners'court is authorized
    to fix an amount less than $150.00 as the maximum which
    a drainage district commissionermay receive in any one
    month. The conrmissioners' court determines the amount
    to be paid upon application of the drainage district
    cuumissioners"showing the necessity therefor."
    Article 8120 provides that before the accounts
    of the drainage district conmissionersshall be approved
    by the commissioners'court, "such commissionersshall
    . first submit a detailed report in writing, under oath, to
    the Commissioners1Court of their County showing the time
    actually consumed in the work for said district, and ae-
    scribing the work done, and such reports shall be audited
    and allowed by the Co~ssioners' Court in such amount as
    it may determine; . . .
    Article 8161b makes no provision for the method
    of payment of drainage district commissioners,and we are
    unable to find in it any evidence of an intention on the
    part of the Legislature to repeal these provisions of Ar-
    ticle 8120 relating to the method of payment.
    Therefore, we agree with you that the commis-
    sioners of drainage districts governed by Article 88161b
    must submit detailed reports, under oath, as required by
    Article 8120, before their accounts may be approved for
    ..
    ,
    Hon. Ramie H. Griffin, page 4   (V-1215)
    paymsnt. Reither Article 8120 nor Article 8161b states
    at what intervals the commissionersare to receive their
    payi although Artlole 8161b, by providing a monthly rate
    of compensation,apparently contemplatesthat the com-
    missicmers are to be paid monthlg.If they are paid month-
    ly,'then each month they must submit the report required
    by Article 8120.
    The CommisslonerslCourt of Jefferson
    County must set the rate of compensationfor
    commissioners of the drainage district,not
    to exceed $150.00 in any one month. Commis-
    sioners of the drainage districts must sub-
    mit to the commissioners'court detailed
    monthly reports in writing, under oath, show-
    ing the time consumed in the work for the
    drainage district and describing the work
    done.
    APPROVRD:                          Yours very truly,
    J. C. Davis, Jr.                     PRICE DARIEL
    County Affairs Division            Attorney General
    Jesse P. Luton, Jr.
    Reviewing Assistant
    Charles D. Mathews                 William H. Holloway
    First Assistant                              Assistant
    WHH:mW
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-1215

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1951

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017