-
Honorable Claude Isbell secretary of state Capitol Station Austin, Texas Attention: J. Byron Brown Opinion No. O-7309 Re: Filing the charter of the Texas Real Estate Dear Sir: Association. We have received your letter of July 19, 1946, which is quoted as follows: "Submitted herewith is a photostatic copy of the charter of the TEXASREALESTATEASSOCIATION which has been presented to our office to be filed. Such charter states as its purpose clause the fol- lowing: "'The corporation is being formed for the pur- pose of establishing and maintaining uniformity in the commercial usages pertaining to reel es- tate transactions throughout the State of Texas, to acquire, preserve and disseminate valuable business information and to adopt rules, regu- lations and standards concerning transactions connected with real estate, and through educa- tional methods, meetings of members, and dis- semination of literature, to better business conditions in connection with real estate mat- ters. Said association shall have the power to provide and maintain suitable offices to per- form its incorporated purposes.' "The attorney6 for the said association have re- quested that such be filed under Sub-Section 105 of Article 1302, Revised Civil Statutes, 1925, and con- tend that the proper filing fee is $10.00 and that such corporation should be exempt from franchise taxes. "It has been the policy of this office to require similar associations to file under Sub-Section 53 of Article 1302, Revised Civil Statutes, 1925. Honorable Claude Isbell, page 2 (o-7309) “I would be pleaeed if you would answer the fol- lowing: “1. Should the Secretary of State file this charter? “2. If so, under which Sub-Section of Article 1302 does the purpose clause fall? “3. What Is the proper filing fee and fran- chise tax to be charged?” We shall proceed to answer your questions in the order presented. You have stated that the attorneys for this proposed corporation have requested that the charter be filed under Section 105 of Article 1302, V. A. C. 9. We quote that section es follows: "105. Corporations may be created for one or more of the following purposes, namely: Reli- gious, Charitable, Literary, Scientific or Educa- tional. Acts 194.5, 49th Leg., p. 119, ch. 81, § 1.” It is apparently the intention of the incorporators to place their corporation within en “educational” purpose, as that term is used in the foregoing section, by adding to their purpose clause the phrase “through educational methods.” The establish- ment end uniformity of commercial usages and the preservation as well es dissemination of information pertaining to real estate may be in 6ome small measure educational but if so it exists only incidentally es education is not the principal object of an aaso- ciation of this nature. As such, it is our opinion that the pur- pose of the association here does not come within the term educa- tional es used in Section 105 of Article 1302, V. A. C. 9. (A detailed discussion of corporations organized for educational pur- poses is stated In an opinion of thie office addressed to you dated May 1, 1946 and numbersd O-7212.) You have further stated that it has been the policy of your office to require corporations with similar purpose clauses to file under Section 53 of Article 1302, V. A. C. S., which we quote as follows: “53. To organize cotton exchanger, chambers of commerce and boards of trade, with power to provide end maintain liultable rooms for the con- duct of their businees, and to establish and main- tain uniformity in the commercial uses of cities end towns, to acquire, preserve end disseminate valuable business information, end to adopt rules, Honorable Claude Isbell, page 3 (o-7309) regulations end standards of claesiflcation, which shall govern all transactions with the cotton trade, end with other commodities where standarda and clas- sifications ere required, end generally to promote the interest of trade and increase the facilities of commercial transactions. Acts 1899, p. 58.” A comparison of the above quoted Section of Art. 1302 with that of the purpose clause of this association reveals a close similarity of language. It is our opinion that Section 53 we8 designed to authorize the formation of a corporation such as we have here. In fact, it is obvious that this purpose clause wee framed pursuant to the language contained in Section 53 with the addition of the phrase "through educational methods", which, in our opinion, doe6 not change its effect. From a reading of Section 53, it is seen that a cotton exchange, e chamber of commerce or e board of trade may lncorpor- ate thereunder. The association here may be classified within the term "board of trade" es a group of men organized for the advancement of business in the field of real estate. A "board of trade" has frequently been defined by our courts and is done so simply end adequately in the cese of Northwestern Municipal Association v. United States, D. C. Minn.,
22 F. Supp. 18, a6 follows: "A 'Board of Trade' is e body of men organized for the advsncement and protection of business inter- ests." Consequently, we may Say that if you are otherwi6e EatiE- fled with the charter, you may file seme under Section 53 of Article 1302, v. A. c. S. The proper fees to be charged by the Secretary of State upon the filing of a charter ere determined by Article 3914, V. A. C. S., the pertinent parts of which we quote below: "Upon filing of each charter, amendment or eup- plement thereto of a corporation for the 6UppOI-t. of public worship, any benevolent, charitable, education- al, missionary, literary or scientific undertaking, the maintenance of a library, the promotion of a pub- lic cemetery not for profit, end the encouragement of agriculture and horticulture, to aid its member6 in producing and marketing agricultural product6, or for applying, raising, breeding, fattening or market- ing livestock, a filing fee of Ten ($10.00) Dollars, end for filing the semi-annual financial statement Honorable Claude Isbell, page 4 (O-7309) of such agricultural products or livestock produc- tion, Ten ($10.00) Dollars, which shell include the annual license fee. "Upon filing each charter, amendment or supple- ment thereto of a private corporation created for any other purpose intended for mutual profit or benefit, e filing fee of Fifty ($50.00) Dollars. . . ." (Em- phasis added) As we have determined that the association here does not have en educational purpose, it follows that it fells within the language emphasized above end that the proper filing fee is Fifty ($50.00) Dollars. Article 7084, V. A. C. S., authorizes a franchise tax for every domestic end foreign corporation chartered or author- ized to do business in Texas. We quote below only that pert of the statute which we believe applicable to the facts here? (1. . . provided, that such tax shell not be less then Twenty ($20.00) Dollars in the cese of any cor- poration, including those without capital stock, end provided further that the tax shall in no case be com- puted on a sum less then the assessed value, for State ad valorem tax purposes, of the property owned by the corporation in this State." Pursuant to the above statutory wording, it is our opin- ion that the minimum of Twenty ($20.00) Dollars annual franchise tax should be assessed against the corporation proposed here. In conclusion, we must, of course, determine the appli- cability of the franchise tax exemption statute to this proposed corporation; namely, Article 7094, V. A. C. S., which we quote in part es follows: "The franchise tax imposed by this chapter shell not apply to , . . or to corporations hav- ing no capital stock end organized for the ex- clusive purpose of promoting the public interest of any city or town. e .' We have set out above the only possible phrase of the Article under which this corporation might qualify. It is fun- damental law that where e tax is levied by .a general law end one claims en exemption therefrom by reason of en exemption statute, he is required to bring himself clearly within the exemption. The exemption statute, es pertinent here, requires a corporation Honorable Claude Isbell, page 5 (O-7309) to be organized for the exclusive purpose of promoting the public interest. We cannot say that this corporation is so organized. On the contrary, we gether from a reading of the entire charter end the general nature of the orgenization that the primary pur- pose of the association is essentially for the private benefit of its members. The leading Texas case in this regard is McCallum v. Associated Retail Credit Men of Austin,
41 S. W. (2d) 45, where- in our Supreme Court held that the Credit Men's Association of Austin, whose purpose clause and organization we6 very similar to the one presented here, we6 not exempt from the payment of the franchise tax. The Court made the following observations: "The Association's charter purposes reed as fol- lows: "'The purpose for which it is formed is to ec- quire, preserve, end disseminste valuable business information, end to adopt rules end regulations in connection therewith.' "A careful reading of the entire statement of facts demonstrates that the primary purposes of the Association, es disclosed by the charter end its mode end manner of operation, ere not for the exclusive purpose of promoting the public interest of e city or town, but for the personal benefit of its members. Certainly, the Legislature never intended to exempt such a corporation from the tax imposed by Article 7084." It follows from our foregoing statements that the pro- posed corporation here is not exempt from the payment of the fran- chise tax es levied by Article 7084, V. A. C. S., eupra. We trust that this satisfactorily enswers your inquiry. APPROVED AUG9, 1946 Very truly your* /s/ Carlos C. Ashley FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL By /s/ Jack K. Ayer Jack K. Ayer JKA-bw-lm Assistant APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE BYJs/ BWB CHAIRMAN
Document Info
Docket Number: O-7309
Judges: Grover Sellers
Filed Date: 7/2/1946
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017