Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1946 )


Menu:
  •         OFFICE       OF   THE   ATTORNEY     GENERAL   OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    Honorable C, ii,
    County Attorney
    Kotley county
    Ilatador,    Texas
    Dear Sir:                             Opinion No. O-7349
    Ro:
    "L
    *The Tax Colleator
    like    to appbint
    ge of her duties
    Collector, enter
    of office as Tax
    office of County Treas-
    tion involves the construction of Article
    ich, with certain exceptions not here
    Wo person shall hold or exeraiee, at the
    ~me tixie, more than on0 civil office of emOlU-
    nent . . . .*
    .
    577’
    Honorable 0. W. Horrid,       Page 2
    In the case of Kirnbrough v, Barnett,           
    93 Tex. 310
    ,
    5i S. Wr 122, ous Su~relae Court saidr
    Vuiilic office is the right, authority, and
    duty created and conferred by law by %iiich, for
    a given perioci @ither fixed by law or enduring at
    the pleasure of the creating powm, an individual
    is invested with eorae portion of the sovereign
    functions of the $overnment to b:> exercised by hirJ
    for the bonefit OP the public.*
    There aan be AQ qiwstioil that the position of County
    Treasurer is a aivir offietn of molument.       Section l+,J+
    of
    Article XVX of th* Coribt~tutlon provides for such office      in
    title followirl& terra6I
    *The Le islature &hall prescribe the duties
    and provldo 8of the OleUtiOA      the qualified
    voters of each county in this 3 tate, of a county
    treasurer 6.. , . who shall have an office     at the
    oountp seat, and hold their off&es-for two years,
    and until theirs suacesaors are qualified     crud shall
    A
    have sueh compensation as nay be provide by la~.~
    The Legislature     prescribed   ths~dutiea    of such office
    in Title   36, R.C $3,
    It Is nettled that deputy sheriffs   and deputy count
    alarks are public offioers   of this State.   Dongea v. Beall;   Y
    s. W. 2d 5311 Sttite V. Brooks, 
    42 Tex. 62i
    Townea v. Harris,
    13 Tex, 5071 f:urray v. State, 67 8, Vi, 2d 274. Tkis office has
    reviouely held iA Opinion No+ O-4963 that a deputy constable
    Pikewise Is a public officer   of th% State.   By a parity of
    reaeoning and after consideration of Article 7252, the ArtW.e
    under which $e@y    asaeseofa and aolleators   are a?riointed we,feel
    that a deputy assessor and collector   Is also a public officer,
    and that he holds a civil. office of eazolument under this State.
    Article 7252 providea, in part:
    Y!ZaohAsreasor and Colbator of Taxes may ap-
    point one or nore deputies to amSet hail in the
    aeseement Andycollection     of taxes, and nay rquire
    such bond fron the person m a.::xdnted,    aa he deem
    neatmary for hia fndemityj      and the Asse.saor and
    Collector  of Taxes ahall. in all cases be liable end
    accountable for the proceedinv     aad misgonduct
    in office of hle’,~deputiee~ an8 the deputies appoint-
    6d in aooordance tith the orovisions of this Art;iclr
    shall do and perfow    al.1 the duties imposed and fo.-
    qpired by law of Amessors and Col.lect.xs .of ‘i&m j
    and all rots of maoh deputiee done in confomlty      with
    law rhall, be ae binding and valid as if tine by the
    A&W&MIT   ami Colleator of Tmcea in pereonr , . .”
    Zt hollow that the County Treasurer my not elao
    eerve ae (LDeputy Tax Collector.
    Your6 very truly
    I
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-7349

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1946

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017