Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1946 )


Menu:
  •             OFFICE   OF’THE   ATTORNEY   *GENERAL           OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    Hon. Paul H. Iitw.nford
    Criminal District   Attorney
    Vw~nZandt County
    Canton, Tcxna
    Dear Fir!                Opinion No. O-7170
    Rer Whether petition         for    bond
    election in
    Your request   for opinio
    fully   considered   by this depar
    as follows8
    d’
    At the req
    Zandt i!ounty, Te                                  uest    your
    opinion   on the f
    5, Revised    Civil   Statutes,      provides:
    election      Ls held to determine        the
    the lovy of such tw,x or the issuance
    of such bon?s,    e petltioil     therefor,     signed by
    twenty (20) or more, or a majorlty            of those entitle4
    to vote at such election,         shall be presented       ‘to the
    County Judge of the county If for a common school
    district,  * end ‘to the district         trustees    lf for wz
    Independent   school   d.istrict.     etc. ’ . . . . and
    provides  for order of election,          n@.ces     etc.’
    C.
    ,
    lion.   Paul H. Stanford     - Page 2
    “Article    2763,   Revised    Civil   Statutes,    :)rovldesr
    ” ‘All Incorporate4    districts,    having e‘,,!h
    fewer than 150 SChOltMtiCS        according   to the ‘T.a.test
    census,     shall be governed    in the general    admi~nle-
    tration    of theLr schools    by the laws which amply,
    to common school districts;         and all funds of such
    --)dlatrictw      whnll be kept in the county depositories
    and paid out on order of the trustees           approved by
    the county wuperlntendent.’
    “Faata:  Edom Independent  School Dlstrtct    In
    Van Zendt County, Texas,     is in Independent   school
    district    but the number of SChOkW3tiCS   according
    to the lateet    census,  is leea than one hundred fifty.
    ‘This Independent  School Diwtrict           desires
    to have an election   to issue bonds for           the purpose
    of building  a school builaing.
    “Question1     Shall the petition    for such bond
    election   be directed     to the County Judge for e,n
    order for such election       as is provided   for common
    school districts,      or shall it be presented     to the
    District   Trustees    for wn order for such election
    as ie provldid     for lndwpendwnt school districte?”
    Articles     2784e anil 2785, wupre, deal specifically
    with the issuance         of bonds and bon4 elections          for common
    and independent        wchool districts,       while Article      
    2753, supra
    ,
    merely provi4es        that independent       school districts      having fever
    than 150 SchOlaStiC8          shall be governed In the general           adminls-
    tration     of their     schools   by laws which apply to common achooi
    rllwtricta.      We think the specific         bon4 statutes      above quote4
    should control        over the general      provisions     of Article    2763,
    with respect       to general     administration     of said schools      an8 It
    la therefore       our opinion     th& petitiona       for bond elections
    in Independent        wchool dlwtricts      (including     thoee having lqsw
    Hon. Paul H. Stanford   - Page 3
    than 150 scholastics  according   to the latest  census)   should
    be presented  to the trustees   of the independent   school dls-
    tricts  and not to the County Judge.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-7170

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1946

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017