Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1946 )


Menu:
  •              OFFICE   OF THE   ATTORNEY     GENERAL   OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    Hon. D. M. Wiggins
    Prealdent, College or
    Mlnee and Metallurgy
    El   Paso,   Texas
    Dear Dr. Wiggine:
    Meisel Survey, Number 187, eituated near El Paso, in
    El Paso County, and whioh twenty-two aores of'land was
    condemned by the United States Oovernmnt and so taken
    Eon. D. M. Wiggins, page 2
    by the United States Government ror enlarging and lmprov-
    lng the Military Post or Rsssrratlon at Fort Bliss, Texas,
    ror which the amount hereby appropriated was reoaivad
    from the United States Government and deposltd in the
    State Treasury to the oredlt of the Permanent Fund of
    the University or Texas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .#7,748.30’
    *On February 5, 1945, Senator Ii.L. Winfield lntroduoed
    ln the Senate the following bill, hereafter known as 9. B.
    No. 110:
    “‘A BII;LTO BE ENTITLED
    **AN ACT making an appropriation or #7,748.30 to the
    College of Mines and Metallurey. a branoh of The Unlvsrslty
    ” ‘PREAMBLE
    m*WEEREAS, under a judgment rendered on October 27,
    1941, in a oondemnatlon.prooeedlng styled “United States
    or Amerloa v. Stats of Texas, 8t al, No. 107-01~11,~ in
    the Unltsd states Distrlot Court ror the Western Dlstrlot,
    El Paso Division, Stats of Texas, the United States Govern-
    ment aoqulred title to a tract or 22 aores or land, being
    a part of the August Melse!.Survey No. 187 situated near
    El Paso, County of El Paso, State OS Texas~,then ba$onglng
    to the State of Tsxae for the use and bensiit Or thb’~Ollegs
    of Mines and Metallurgy, and was so taken by the United
    States Government for the purpose of providing additional
    lands in its program of enlarging and Improving the
    Killtary Post or Reservation at Fort Bliss, Texas, as
    authorized by law, 8nd paid as oonpensetlon for the taking
    of said property the sum of 87i748.30, prinolpal and
    interest{ and
    ” ‘WHERW ) said sum of money was, in aooordanoe vilth
    the requirements of law, deposited in the State Tr8aEUry
    and oredltad to the Permanent Fund or The University of
    Texas.$ati
    **WHEREAS, the land so taken by the United States
    GOV8rment  was the abandoned site of the College Of Kines
    and Metallurgy, whloh in the establishment of said College
    Eon. D. M.   WigginS,   page   3
    ,li
    by the Legislature of the State of Texas was donated
    to the Stat8 as a site for said College, and oonsequently,
    the College qt Mines and Metallurgy, is justly entitled
    to the use and benefit of the oompenaatlon paid by the
    Governmeht for this property, which makes necessary the
    appropriation made by this Aot.
    "'BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
    ulSeotlon 1. There is hereby appropriated out of any
    ~loneyain the Stat6 ‘W~ESUP~ not otherwise appropriated
    the sum or S7.7L8.30.
    . . . .    or so much thereof as map be neoea-
    sary, to bs,expendid'
    Oy authorized to p
    may deem proper and neoessary within and adjaoent to said
    oampua~0r the Collsge or Mines ana Metsllurgy and to make
    suoh iznprovementethereon es it msy deem proper 8.ndmoea-
    sary and to enter into oontraots ror these purposes.
    **Seotlon 2. The faot t&t the College or Mines ana
    Metallurgy  at El Paso Is greatly in need or additional
    lads and improvements and the iaot that said College
    is entitled to the immediate urn8 and benerlt ot the money
    hereby appropriated for eald gurgosss oreates an emergenoy
    and an lmperatlve publio neoeeslty that the Constitutional
    iiulerequiring bills to be reed on three sev,eraldays in
    eaah House be suspended, and the 6~18 is hereby suspended,
    and this Aot shall take efreot end be in foroe rrom and
    after  its passage, and it ls 80 enaoted.'
    *You will observe that this bill says, quote in part:
    *. . . for th8 purpose of acquiring additional land within
    and adjaaent to the oanipusor said College and the making
    0r improvements thereon . . .*
    "9. 8. No. 110 was reported favorably out of the
    OoaUftt88~ln th8 Seapte on Maroh 29 and passed the 98n'at6
    on May 15, 1945. In.th% meanttie, slnoe th% Session was
    drawing n%ar to the olose, Senator Wlnfield submitted a
    aopy or this bill (9. B. No. 110) to the Committee on
    Claima and Acoounts and asked that sem8 be inserted in the
    Nieoellaneous Claims Bill. As I understand it, this request,
    along with the other requests made to th% COmIr&tt%8on
    Hon. D. NM.Wiggins, pa&X84
    Claims and Aooounts was submitted to the Attorney
    General's Department (Judge Flewellen aoted as adviser
    to this Committee.) for approval berore being inserted
    in the Mlsoellaneoua Claims Billi after all olalmn,
    lnoludlng the claim in question, were approved by the
    Attorney General's Department, Mrs. Edna Rosen, Secre-
    tary of the Committee on Misoellaneous Claims and
    Aocounts, typed the Mlsaell8neous    Claims Bill ama
    Judge FhVdl8n      aided her in wording the various claims,
    lnoludlng the one in question. It was an lnadvertenoy
    on soad one's part that the phrase *and the making of
    improvements thereon' was omitted. This bill (Ii.B.
    No. 701~Miscellaneous    Clah   Sill) was passed in the
    Senate May 18, 1945, and the House oonourred on May 21.
    In the meantime, S. B. No. 110 was reoelved in the
    House end passed the House on May 31, 1945.
    "OneJtie 4, 1945, R. B. No. 701 was filed by the
    Governor wlthout his signature. The eut&r or 9. B.
    No. 110, not knowing what the outaom8 of IL B.No. 701
    might be, had not made any effort 40 withdraw 8. B.
    No. 1104 but lmmedlately upon~the filing bp the Governor
    or H. B; No. 701, Senator Wlnrleld requested the Governor
    to veto 9. B. No. 110 in view or the faot that there was
    a duplloetlon slnoe he was under the impression that
    Ii.B. No. 701 oarrled in full the &ternasked ior in 5. B.
    No. 110. The Governor then vetoed 9. B. No. 110 at the
    author's request.
    *In view tit the faot that 9. B. No. 110 was approved
    by both Houses of the Leglsleture and was vetoed at the
    requeat of the author and slnoe we reel that it was the
    implied intention of the Legislature in both lnstanoes
    to provide ror both the purohaslng and the lmprorlng or
    the property, I should like to here an opinion from the
    Attorney General*8 Department advising whether expendi-
    turen may be made for paving, ourblng,   and oonstruoting
    sidewalks around the property in questiodrn
    You have oorreotly quoted the it8niinvolved, and
    it is olear therefrom that the appropriation wes made to the
    permanent fund of the University of Texas, expressly for the
    purpose of aoqulrlng additional land within and adjacent to
    Bon, D. M. Wiggins, page 5
    the present oampus of the College of Mines and Metallurgy.
    The making of improvements upon suoh land la quite a
    different thing from the purpose of the appropriation,
    and cannot be allowed upon any conception of such mistake
    or inadvertence es mentioned by you. The validity or an
    aot may not be attacked or its plain meaning perverted by
    matters thus loreign to the l8glslatlve prooesses. Suoh
    oonsfdaration 1s beyond the‘utmost latitude of statutory
    sonstruotlon.
    Yours very truly
    ATTORNEYGENE
    BY
    0s:AMM
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-7063

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1946

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017