Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1946 )

i; 3onoFa~Theo$llilm 6. P8lns.r Aatin# Meride& unlvomtty 02 Tons Austin, Tons 130. O-7021 lnll8t.d Ithor o o r td.n permn- OS t&hau. s. 3avy in 8tknd- b ~8t3avy v-l2 tlnlts,who 8ro ,tu transfomd to iarotlvo w ,bY ‘ths 3w.Y -at (pro- w thy 8grko to iBotlthnm to . 1 3on. T&ophilm 6. F%htu, m 2 The 8t8tUtS in tiwtion Artlals 24$xbl, %FilOtl'8 &l80$8bd '%8&i t?iVil blt.8, OOfltdtU th8 iolla provlrlcrnl &kid Ealle&.eiim substuttl8lly Uie r;# o tioam (Options l(A) utd 2(r),) to #odIoal dmntial u& t&eolo&al rtudurtr a nlatim dot;J 8t Rqy'y V-b tfnlt8: who &vo~not cow p1at.d tboir proferrionaltralnlngby l emrtain datei. . . i . * Xon. Thoophilw 8. Fainter, paBe 4 of WI.&Xl8 vr8, W88 undoubtully188U.d "for the COJW8IliO- o? the gw*rmmnV u 8 part of the deaobllls8tlonprogram, rcltbr thut for the perronal bmofit of any indlvidur~.``T+ gWWkWlt'8 l.nltl8tlvo, rather th8n the W18h of 8X9' inaioidu81, wdo, nmmlyt Tran8far to iMatiW Urkin UWditiOM) Of tl?aNfOr 8ndtb lPIl'818* of .lher OpthI n the 8ttiOnt'8 8tatU8. In OW OplniOn, th0 qXOrOi8e O? @tiOn f 18 not th kbd Of pr8O&Ul rOqw8t" COnt4mpl8t.dby the &pi818tUlW. By /I/ Raymond A. Lynoh ""&8~n~