Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1945 )


Menu:
  •                  OFFICE    OF THE   ATTORNEY    GENERAL   OF   TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    GROVER     SELLERS
    ATIOINSI   G”~=“A‘
    Hon. J. P. Wllllaar
    County Attorney
    bar a93
    Yoakm county
    Plalna, Taraa
    Dear Slrr
    yodd        t&Q be governed  by thq laws under     the   new set
    UP1      as-passed by the recent  Legislature?
    Y.-.-he County Treaaurcr’s aalsry  ~8s not        included
    in    the recent  lawa passed by the Legialaturua,        what
    authority,   It any, does the Commlreloner9a Court have
    ror adJustlng the salary of the County lhnaurer,    In
    line with the aslarlea   paid to the other ofrloers of
    the      County?”
    Hon.   J.   P.   ``11~18m8, page   2
    Tho population     of Yoakum County 88 shown by thr 1940
    Fedora1 Census la 5,354, and whhrnthr Commia8lonara’ Court ot
    aald oounty drtrrmlno8      that the ocunty offlOer8 shall br oan-
    penaatod   on thr basis of an annual salary rather than on a fee
    basis,   the amount of ths annual salaries        whloh the 8ommlaslonera~
    Court may rlx ror suoh orrloera         la governed by thr provlalona      or
    Sootloh 15 or Artlola      39128, Vornon@a Annotated Civil Statutes,
    together with the amendment to aaid Artiolr,           set rorth in Smotlon
    4 or Senate Bill No. 123 Aota Of the 49th Legleleture,               1945. The
    above mentioned Artlcla       I a8 amended) oontalna g mar01 provlsloa8
    a# to the mlnlmum and mnxlmum lalrrlea, lpplloablo             to’811 ooun-
    tlra having a population oi 1080 than 20,000 Inhabitanta,              agoord-
    lng to the last      roordlng Fedaral Cuxaua, whore the Cormnlaa~lonora’
    Court has aetrrm Pned that the oountF ofilorra           shall be paid on a
    salary basis,     88 wrll as spoolal Drovlalona,       lpplloabl~    under
    pertain olroumatanoes,      whorrby    thr Coamlaaloner8~ Court may allow
    oortaln prroentagea      or lnoreaae to br added to the amount of the
    aalarlea    allowed nnder Dhr grnrral provisions         of raid aeotlon.
    As a ganoral Dro?lelon with referOnOe to the minimum
    ehd maximum aalarl8a OZ OoWIty OfflOOrs, In OoUUtle8 having a
    population   oi 18.~8 than 20,000 inhabitants aooordlng to the or-
    ceding Ysdrr0.l Census, wm rind the following   language In Sootion
    15, Artlole   3912r, V. A. C. S.:
    ‘Thr Commla6ionarrt Court in oountlar having a
    population     of 1088 than twenty thousand (20,000)  Inhab-
    itants,    aooordlng  to the last preo8ding Federal  Census
    at the first     regular    meeting     In Janurrry oi laoh oelen-
    dar year, may pass en order providing                for dcinpensatlon
    of all county and preolnot           offloers     on a salary basis.
    The Commlssloners’        Court In eaoh of suoh counties            in
    hereby authorized,        and it shall       be its duty,     to rlx the
    salaries     cf Criminal    District      Attorneys.      In the event
    such Court passes        suoh order they shall          pay to each of
    said District      and County OffiOer8         in Coney an annual
    salary   in twelve     (12) equal installments           of not lea8
    than the tote1      sum earned as oompen8ation             by raid
    orrloer    lr hi8 said oifloial          oapaolty    for the fl8oal
    year of 1933 and not more than the maximum allowed                    suoh
    ofrloer    under laws existing         August 24th, 1935......”
    Hon.   J.   F’. “‘lllle?s,   -,sge    7
    Thus, unZsr the above    quoted general provision,    tIm
    mlnlmum salary vhloh may be paid to the orrlcerr     referred    to
    la the amount earned a8 oompenaetion by eaoh retipeotlvo      orfloor
    In his said orrlolal   oapaolty for the fkroel yeer 1935, while
    the marlmum salary under raid general provlalon     of this eeotlon
    la the mulmm! oanpenaatlon whloh each r8apeotlve      offloer    was
    ellowed under law8 existing    Aueuat 24, 1935, ($),OOO.OO;for
    orrloers  lnoluded therein,   other than the oaunty treasurer;
    #2,000.CC ror the oounty treaaurerl.
    I’:‘lth reference    to s~eolsl provlolona  slithorizing
    certain peroentegoa       of lnoreeae to be added to the roregolng
    amounts eUowed under the general prorl8lona,          the pertinent
    prorlalona   are:
    R    , provided,   thet in oountlaa having a
    &la&          or lea8 than twenty thousand (20,000)          lnhab-
    ltanta,   according   to tho last preoedlng Federal Census,
    and having an aeaeased valuation       In uoeaa     oi  Ten Mll-
    lion ((10,000,000.00)      Dollars ecoordlng to the last
    preceding approved tax roll ot such ocunty the maxhum
    amount rllowed such orrioers       a8 sal8rlea   may be ln-
    creased ona (1%) purr cert for eaoh One Xllllon
    (~1,000,000.00)     Dollar8 valuation,    or rraotionel      part
    thereof,   In exceaa oi meld Ten Mllllon       ($10,000,000.@0)
    Dollars valuation      over end above the maximum      amount
    sllomrd such oifloers      under la w8lxistlng     on Auguet
    24, 1935, . . ." (Section        15, Article   39124)
    Thus, ::ken the ~omissioners           ’ Court determines      to in-
    crease    the ofricers       selariec    above the amounts allowed        under the
    general    provis:ons       (@,OOO.OO     - r*2 , OOO.OO), under the above
    q1;oted Irovlsion,        ;ne perof nt per rciilion      or ?ractlon,thereof        oi
    ;unty     tax vsl;%:.tlrr.     akve   .~10,OCO,OZO.G0 nay be eSded tc the
    :xe;oi.lg     b.rounts.
    I^$      “That ‘actlcn        15 0r Article 35120, Sevlsed          Xv11
    .i,
    -tetutee    3 Texbs,        1925, as amended, be end the          8aze
    is hereby amnded        by adding     thereto   the   following:
    “‘Lq  The Commissioners      Court     la hereby authorizeA,
    -&en in t..slz      ,iudtl;ment the ilnanc:al      conditlzn   of the
    __ ‘lnty 2 n i the ZETCS c: the cfficsrs,
    .-                                                  justtry  the increase,
    - e2ter ~1.: -r.ier
    -“_,                      iiicreesing t5e ccm?enseti:n       c1’ the
    ;:,tci..ct,    ckinsy   2z~L d:a;rict   oific~rs       In 3 s?dl-,isnsl
    Hon.        J.   F. “:illlama,      page   4
    rmount     not   to   sxoeed   twenty-tire   (25%)   per   oent
    o r the r umlllcmrd under the law tor the ilboal.
    year o? 1944, proridrd the total oolpsnbation
    ruthorlbbd under the law for the tlboal Fear oi
    1944 did not sxoeed the bum o? Thirty-nix   Hundred
    ($3600.00)  Dollarb. (a (sec. 4, 9. a. 123) Aotb
    .      49th Lbglblbture,   1945)
    Thle prorlbion
    authorizer   the Comlealonsrb’       Court
    to       allow    an   inoraeesthe balarl~b
    in         o? the OttlOsrb     referred
    ‘to, not to bxoead twenty-tlvb         peroent bbove thb amount allowed
    under the law a8 oompenbatlon for buoh ottlorrb              for the tl8oQ
    year 1944.     Thub, in order to determine the ~xlmum b#brleb
    allowable    in Yoakum County under thlb         prorlblon   when beid oounty
    ohanger to the ralary bybtem on January           1, 1946, it lb ffrrt
    neoebbbry to detrrmlne what amount wbb bllowed              under  the law tor
    bald oiiioere   in Toakum Coiintq tor the tlboal          year 1944. In the
    tiboal   year 1944, bald ottloerb         o? Yoakum County were oompen-
    bated on a ?ee basib and were rubjeot to the provisions                ot
    Artloleb    3863 and 3891, V. A. C. S., lx o epth         t e0Ounty   treasurer
    whose maximum oompenbation wab governed by the provision8                  or
    Artlola 3943, V. A. C. S. The oompenbatlon allowed those otil-
    oera governed In the year 1944 by the provision8              ot &tloleb
    3883 and 3891 war llmlted to $3,000.00,           while under the prowl-
    blonb OS Artiale   3943,    the    oompenbatlon oi the oounty treasurer
    web limited to $2,000.00.         Se note here that the provisions           oi
    Section 15, Artlole      3912e, authorizing      the amount bllowed under
    laws existing   August 25, 1935, to be inoreased           at the rate o?
    one percent     per million       or fraction       thereof    or county tax relu,s-
    tlon In exoess       ot $10,000,000.00,         according      to the last        approved
    tax roll,     applies    only to those       oounties      operating       on the salary
    basis.     “lnoe Yoakum County was not operating                   under the salary
    law In the flsoal        gear 1944, the one percent              per million       in
    excess    of ten pillion      reterrsd     tc i:. said salerr          la:: oc,uld net b
    apTlIed    in deterzinixc        the aEo:ount of tte         salaries      aLlox.?5 under
    the law for the oftiolals           o? Yoakun Count;? for the iiecel                 yeer
    1944.     Thus,   In   a county,    such   as   Yoaiu~     County,     that    opersted
    on a fee basis       in 1944, the amount allowed              undar the law tor
    the fiaoal     year was governed        by the llmitatlons            of Artloles
    3883, 3891 and 3943.          ‘::hen the twenty-five          peroent      Increase
    591
    Hen.   J.    :.    “~‘?lllece,    pege   5
    authorized     by Seotlon 4 o? S. B. No. 123, la added to the
    maximum amount allowed under the lbW ?or the tleoal               year
    1944, the total maximum snuual         salary    allowable   by virtue
    o? buoh proriblon      would be $3750.00      ($3,000.00   PlUb   25%)
    for  all   orrloerb  referred  to, exoept the oount         treasurer
    whobe maximum bnnuel balarg would be $2500.00 T$2,000.00
    PlU* 25%).
    SummarIb?.ng the above        and foregoing, you are
    adrlsedr
    (1)        Under the general provlbIonb o? Seotlon 15,
    Artlole   3912e, wlthout reterenoe         to the appll-
    oatlon of any speolal        prtnlalon    authorizing
    peroentager     of lnorebbo,     the maximum annual
    bblbr~   of the ottloerb lnoluded therein              lb
    the maximum emount o? compensation allowed
    buoh otrloerb      under laws existing       Augubt      24,
    1935,   ($2,000.00    for  the oounty treasurer1
    $3,COO,OO for other ofiloers          referred      to).
    (2)        Under the special     provlslonb   authorizing     per-
    oentages o? lnoreese     above the foregoing
    amount8 under the general provlalona,the
    mexlmum   peroentage o? lnoreabe,      lnbotar as
    Toakum County 1s oonoemed,        would be twenty-
    ?lre peroent,    unless the tax valuation       of
    said   oounty an shown by the approved tex
    rolla of 1945 wan suoh an amount that an
    Increase o? more then twenty-five         percent
    could be authorized.       stated dl??erently,It
    viould     be neoeesary    that   the   1945 tax          valua-
    tion     o? Yoakur: County be In exoess              of
    ``5,000,OCO.OO before          the fore&olcg    amount.8
    (t?,OC,O.CO end ~2,GCO.OO) could be ICcrezsed
    more t,“.Er. t.iient.y-five    yeroent.    Thus, If the
    1945 t,zx vzluEtl)n         or Yoakun: County is
    :35 ,OOC,OCO.COor less,           the mxlmum          annual
    salary of the county treaeurer            for        the flaoel
    year 1946 would be $2500.00,             ant   for        other
    oiiloers       governed    by the salary law, the
    maximum annual         salary  vrould be $j750.00.
    Hon. J. P. ::‘illiams,      page 6
    Nlth reterenor       to Jour question as to the bdjubt-
    ment that may be made in the OOunty trebburer*b         bb1br~,    the
    foregoing dibOU#biOn    inoludeb the prorIbion8 l    pplloable     to
    the county trerburer    where a oountf oompenbateb it8 o??loerr
    on the baa18 oi an annual bblary.         When a oounty operate8 on
    a balary Habib,    the QrotibiOnS     o? hOtiOn  15, AX%iOle    j912e
    (ab amended)    lre     lppliobble to the ocmpenbatlon of the ocuntr
    treaburer.     However,when a oounty oompenbateb    it8 OffiOerb
    on 8 fee babib, we know of no prorlblon    authorizing   anr ln-
    oreaae beyond the ,62,000.00 maximum ocmpenbbtlon authorized
    by Artlole 3943.    In thin oonneotlon we refer you to our
    Opinion Rio.O-6588, addrebbed to you, wherein if wan pointed
    out  that Seaata Bill Ho. 12) in no ray amended the protlblonb
    lpplloable to the mbXi.lIIUm oompenbation of the eountf treasurer
    when the oftloers   of the oountf are ocaapenbbted   on 8 tee kblb.
    We trubt     that   the above and SOregOing batib?aotorll~
    anbwerb your lnqulrleb.
    Yours         very     truly,
    ATTORNEY
    GENERALOF TEXAS
    BY                     J. A.   gllib
    ASbiStSnt
    .-.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-6734

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1945

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017