Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1945 )


Menu:
  •                   OFFICE   OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL           OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN 11
    porrblo        John II.amOk
    ewl.Dal       Mstrlct  Attorney
    ,rar    county
    m Antonio,        Tax88
    AW?.      Nr. L. J. Olttlager
    mr     8lr:                         opinion   lo.   o-6728
    Both of tbeao bllle
    Constitution   provides:
    body of $he~‘act,,   the Legislature  shall, by a vote of-tvo-
    thirds of all the     members elected  to each House, othervlse
    direct; sah vote      to be taken by year and naps, and entered
    upon the journals.    ’
    By reason of this provision,    B. B. 849, which vas enacted
    i.a Map, 1945, vi11 not become effective     until ninety days after ad-
    jOurnment of the 49th Legislature,     vhich is September 4, 1945, be-
    muse there vas no record vote on final passage of the bill         ln
    the Senate.    On the other hand, S. B. 246 became effective      on
    June 2, 1945, vhen it vas flled    with the Secretary    of State, because
    it contained an emergency clause,     and it vas passed by a record vote
    gonoreble   John R. Shook, page 2
    lf tvo-thirds   of the members of each House.      The question,  then, 1s
    vhether the latest    expresrlon of the Legislature    repeals a former
    uv Insofar    as the tvo are In conflict,   even though the former
    uv has not yet become effective     as a lav.    It is stated In Texas
    furlsprudence   that “vhere tvo acts passed at the same session cannot
    be reconcllod   by any knovn rule of construotlon,     the first  in time
    er position   must give vay to the loft,   vhlah will stand    as the final
    expression of the legl8latlve    ~111.    (39 Tex68 Jurisprudence,     147)
    In our oplnlon     lo.   O-5891,   Issued   Hay 30,   1944,   ve said:
    lA8 the latest expression of the L8gl8latlve      vi11
    prevails,  the ltatute last passed vi11 prevail     over a
    statute passed prior to It, irrespective      of whether the
    prior statute   takes effect  before or efter   the later
    statute.   People TS. Darner,   
    328 Ill. 512
    , 160 1. 0.
    Hevbauer      vsr 8kte,   200 bd. 118, 161 1. B.
    J State     vs. 8ohumburg,     
    149 Ia. 470
    , 89 SO.
    J 8kti      Y. lhraus,   34 f. 1. 378, 281 Pro.
    f W.nslov                         
    112 Ore. 23
    , 228
    PM.  101,   34 A. L, B.                              ‘IS. York,
    268 PO. 143,   110 Atl.
    You are, therefore, advised that in our opinion 3. B. 246
    repeals   H. B. 849 insorar as the tvo act8 are In irreconcilable oon-
    illct.
    ?D/JCP
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-6728

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1945

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017