Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1945 )


Menu:
  • Hon. D. W. Burkhalter
    Acting County Attorney
    Box 953
    Tbroekmorton,Texas
    Dear Sir:
    Opillloll
    180.o-6692
    Re: Is the clause in a contract for
    collection of delinquent taxes
    permitting the eontractor six
    months    after   the temlnation       of
    the   oontract    to prosecute     anlts
    filed to fFna1 judgmentsvalid?
    And a related gueation.
    You have requested our opinion upon the following
    questions:
    1. Is the clause In a delinquenttax contract
    permitting the contractorsix months after tbs t8rminatlon
    of the eontraot to posecute suits to final jud&mentsvalid,
    and is the tax attorney entitled to his oommlaslons on all
    taxes so collected during this six months period?
    2. Is the delinquenttax attorney entitled to
    collect the costs that have been paid in to the collector,
    when he has not done anything except file suit? If not,
    who 1s entitled to such costs?
    This department la opinion Ro. 0-237A, a copy of
    which is enclosed, held that under contra&s similar to the
    one in which you are interested,suits for delinquenttaxes
    flied by the tax attorney during the contract,periodand
    settled by h%m within SIX months after th6 terminati.ondate
    are clearly contemplatedby the contract, and that the
    commissionto be received by the attorney applies without
    question. We therefore answer your first question in the
    affirmative.
    Hon. D. W. Burkhalter, page 2     (O-6692)
    Article 7332, V. A. C. S., provides the fees
    certain officialsreoelve In suits for collection of delln-
    quent taxes, and being a later statute than Articles 7335
    and 7335a, controls'over any provisions contrary thereto.
    ArtIdle 7333 provides that the fees mentioned in Article
    7332 are taxed as costs in delinquent tax sul.ts. We call
    your attentton to that portion of Article 7332 wherein It
    is provided that where delinquenttaxes are collectedunder
    contracts between the commissionerscourt and others for
    the oollectlon of such taxes, the fees provided for county
    and district attorneys are not assessed or collected.
    Therefore, In your case, there are no fees which the county
    attorney or tax attorney could claim. If any such fees
    were assessed and collected,they should be returned to the
    taxpayer.
    Under the delinquenttax contract pertinent to
    this opinion, the tax attorney receives lC$ of the amount
    of all delinquenttaxes, penalty and interest actually
    collected and paid to the tax collector durFng the term of
    the aontract, which the tax attorney was instrumentalin
    collecting. If the filing of the suits by the tax attorney
    was instrumentalin collectingthe taxes, he Fs entitled
    to his commissions;if they were not, he is not entFtled
    to his oommissions. This Is a question of fact depending
    upon each separate case*
    Yours very truly
    ATTORNEYGENERAL OFTEKAS
    BY                0. Koch
    0. Koch
    Assistant
    ROK:AMM:mjs
    Enclosure
    APPROVED AUG 10, 1945
    /&y;~;,~;~w
    ATTCREEY GRNRRAL'
    APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE
    BY /s/BWB CHAIRMAN
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-6692

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1945

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017