-
_- .. THE AYTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS Honorable Reagan S. Wyche County Auditor Gregg County Longview, Texas Dear Sir: OpinLon No. O-6580 Re: Authority of CommissFoners' Court oftGregg County, Texas, under facts stated, to Increase salaries of certain county officers. Your request for opinion has been received and care- fully considered by this department. We quote from your re- quest as follows: "Prior to 1940 census~,,GreggCounty haa a population of 15,115. After the Salary Bill was passed, the Commissioners' Court, under provision of that law, set the salarles of the Tax Assessor-Collector, County Clerk, District Attorney, District Clerk and Sheriff at $4,250. per annum. "In 1940, the census showed the county to have a population of 58,000 and since that time the salaries of said officers have been paid in accordance with section 13, 39123 at $4,250. 'Gregg County, according to the last preced- ing tax,valuation, had an assessed valuation of $103,000.ooo. The last portion of the first paragraph of section 13, article 39123 provides "and provided that in counties having a population of thirty-seven thousand five hurarea (37,500) and less than sixty thousand (~o,ooo), according to the last preceding Federal Census, and having an aBSeSSed~ValUatiOn in excess of Twenty Mlllitin (20,000,000.00) Dollars, accord- ing to the lastpreceding approved tax roll of such county, the maximum amount allowed such of- ficers aB salaries, may be increased on (1s) per cent for each One Million ($l,OOO,OOO.OO) Dollars valuation or fractional part thereof, In excess of said Twenty Million ($20,000,000.00) Dollars val- Hon. Reagan S. Wyche, page 2 0 -6580 uatlon over and above the maximum amount allowed such officer under laws existFng on August 24, 1935." "Since Gregg Countg.1~ wlthin the population bracket and~has $83;000,000.00 more than the mini- mum of $20,000,000.00 set out in said law, please advise. "Question: Has the CommI.ssloners'Court of Gregg County authority to raise the salaries of said officers from $4,250.00 to $5,100.00 per annum Under and by virtue of section 13, article 3912E above cited." Article 3912e, Section 13, Vernon's Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, reads in part as follows: "The Commlssioners' Court In counties .' having a population-of twenty thousand (20,000) inhabitants or more, an&less than one hundred and ninety thousand (190,000) inhabitants aci coraFng to the last preceding Federal Census, Is hereby authorized and it shall be its duty to fix the salarles of all the following named officers; towit: sheriff, assessor and collector of taxes, county judge, county attorney, inclua- ing crlmlnal district attorneys and county at- torneys who perform the duties of district at- torneys, district clerk, county clerk, treasurer, hide and animal inspector. Each of said officers shall be paid in money an annual salary In twelve (12) equal installments of not less than the total sum earned as compensation by him in-his official capacity for the fiscal year 1935, and not more than the maximum amount allowed such officer under laws existing on August 24, 1935. . . . and ,providedthat in counties having a pop- ulatLon,of thirty-seven thousand five hundred (37,500) and less than sixty thousand (60,000) according to the last preceding Federal Census, and having an assessed valuation in excess of Twenty MillIon ($20,000,000.00) Dollars, accord- ing to the last preceding approved tax roll of such county, the maximum amount allowed such 6fficers as salaries, may be increased one (I$) per cent for each One Million ($1,000,000.00) Dollars valuation or fractional part thereof, in excess of said Twenty Million ($20,000,000000) Dollars valuation over and above the maximum amount allowed such officer under laws existing Hon. Reagan S. Wyche, page 3 0-6580 on August 24, 1935." Opinion No. O-2582 of this clepartmentheld, among other things, that the change in population of Travis County, Texas, had no effect upon the salaries of the officers named Ln Section 13 of Article 3912e V.A.C.S. and that the 1930 Federal Census (and not the 1960 Federal Census) was applic- able in determlning.the "maximuti,amountallowed such officer under laws existing on August 24, 1935." We enclose here- with a copy of Opinion No. o-2582 for your information. After the rendition of oDInion No. O-2582, the 47th Legislature of Texas, 1941, Regular Session, enacted H.B. 518, which applied to Travis and other counties coming within the population brackets of 100,OO to 190,000 inhabitants. We quote from said House Bill as follows: "Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Texas: "Section 1. The Commissioners Courts in all counties of Texas having a population,of not less than one hundred thousand (100,000) and. not more than one hundred and ninety thousand (190,000) inhabitants, accoralng to the last preceding Federal Census, in fixing the annual salary that shall be pald an officer named in Section 13 of Chapter 465 of the Acts of the Second Called Session of the Forty-fourth Leg- islature, where such officer's salary IS deter- mined in compliance tiiththe laws which existed on August 24, 1935, and is based upon popula- tion, shall compute and fix the salary of each of such officers at the maximum amount which could have been paid each of such officers under the laws existing on August 24, 1935, according to the Federal Census of 1940 and thereafter ac- cording to the last preceding Federal Census; provided the CommI.sslonersCourts in said counties are authorized to amend the present order of said Court fixing the maximum salary of said officers for the fiscal year 1941 from and after the ef- fective date of this Act for the balance of said fiscal year, according to the Federal Census of 1940, and thereafter according to the last pre- ceding Federal Census. "Sec. 2. The Legislature in the enactment of what is called the Officers' Salary Bill, being Chapter 465 of the Acts of the Second Called . ” Hon. Reagan S. Wyche, page 4 O-6580 Session of the Forty-fourth Legislature, in pro- viding compensation for public officers on the basis of salary instead of the fee basis as there- tofore existed, In Section 13 thereof provided 'an annual salary In twelve (12) equal installments of not less than the total sum earned as compen- sation by him lnhis official capacity for the fiscal gear 1935, and not more than the maximum amount allowed such'orficer under laws existing on August 24, 1935'; and whereas, under the laws e2istlng on August 24, 1935, many officers' salaries were fixed on the basis of population according to the last preceding Federal Census ana the fact that by the recent publication of the Federal Census for 1940 many county officers by reason of the Increase In population of their counties, according to saIa Census, would.be justly and lawfully entitled to more compensation under the l%iti as it existed on August 24, 1935, but for the fact that said Act has been construed to con- fine said officers'.salaries to the maximum allowed them under sald law, according to the population as shown by the Federal Census of 1930, creates any emergency and an Imperative public necessity calling for the suspension of the Constitutional Rule requir- ing bills to be read on three several days In eadh House, and the Rule Is hereby suspended and this Act shall take effect and be in force from and after its pass- we, and it Is so enacted." 'The population of Gregg County, Texas, according to the 1930 Federal Census,was 15,788 inhabitants. sunder laws existing August 24, 1935, the maximum amount which county of- ficers of Gregg County, Texas, could retain was the sum of $3,000.00 per~annum. See paragraph 2, Article 3891, Vernon's Annotated Texas Civil Statutes. Since the population of Gregg County, Texas, according to the 1940 Federal Census was 58,027 inhabitants, the provi- sions of Article 3912e, Sec. 13,
V.A,C.S., supra, with refer- ence to a 1% increase of salary for each million dollars val- uation in excess of twenty million dollars will also apply to Gregg County, Texas. Since there is 83 million dollars valuation In excess of 20 mllllon dollars valuation In Gregg County, the county officials subject to the salary law could be allowed, if the Commissioners' Court saw'fit to allow same, a salary increase of 83% on the sum of $3,000.00, which amounts to~the sum of $2,490.00. The sum of $2,490.00 plus the sum of $3,000.00 makes the total sum of $5,490.00. Hon. Reagan S. Wyche, page 5 0-6580 It Is our opinion that the Commissioners' Court of Gregg County, Texas, is authorized to increase the salaries of the Tax Assessor-Colletitor,County Clerk, Criminal District Attorney Dlstrlct Clerk and Sheriff to an amount not in ex- cess of $5,490.00 per annum. However, we wish to point out that where the annual salaries of county officials operating under the Officers' Salary Law have been set, same may not be Increased or de- creased during the year but may be increased or decreased the following year within the llmltations prescribed by law. See OplLnLonsNos. O-1595 and O-4226 of this Department, copies of which are enclosed herewith for your information. Yours very truly ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS By sk Wm. J. Fanning Wm. J. Fanning AssIstant WJF:BT:wc APPR0VEL.I MAY 24, 1945 s/Grover Sellers ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS Approved Oeinion Committee By s/GWB Chairman
Document Info
Docket Number: O-6580
Judges: Grover Sellers
Filed Date: 7/2/1945
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017