Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1944 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                           653
    OFFICE    OF THE AlTORNEY  GENERAL                 OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    GROVER SELLERS
    AI~ORNCY GENERIL
    Hon. John C. Marburcer
    County At tnrney
    Fayette County
    La Grange, Texas
    Dear    Sir:
    requesting     the
    opinion   of this        d                              iions   stated    therein,
    reads,  in part,
    your opinion    whether
    ourt may legally    pay
    by the County Superin-
    subjeot,      I find that the
    of  Texas, Article        7, has made extan-
    n8 for     our ehoational         system, Arti-
    n 42 of the Texas Con&i t.utfon pro-
    e legislature      shall      pass such laws
    necessary     to oarry into affect         the
    f this Constitution.          Apparently     the
    office    of    County Superintendent            is not a consti-
    tutional       office,     but has bean created          by the
    1eSlslature         by virtue     of the above mentioned          con-
    stitutional         provisions.       In faot,      Section   16,
    of Article        7, provides      that
    ‘The legislature      shall fix by law the
    terss   of all offices      of the Public    Sohool
    System ana of the State Institutions           of
    higher    education,   imlusi9s,     and the terms
    of members of the respective         boards,   not
    to exceed six years’.
    654
    Hon.   John C. Earburger,        page   2
    “Apparently,    in pursuance    of the above
    mentioned constitutional       provisions,   the
    legislature     enacted Article    2688 R.C.S.   which
    creates     the offioe  of County Superintendent,
    the tern of office,      etc.,  and also provides
    that:
    *----and   who ahall be provided           by the
    Commissioners*      Court with an office           in
    the courthouse,      and v:l.th neoessary        office
    furniture     and fixtures    ----*.
    “It will be noted that Artlols  2688, R.C. S.
    as amended was enaoted :n 1932, whereas the legis-
    lature    in 1935 enacted Article 3899 B. R.C.S. whlah
    provided    ln parts as follows:
    *seotion   2.   Suitable    offioee      and
    stationery     and blanks necessary         in the
    performanoe     of their duties     mag in the
    disoretion     of the Commissloners~          Court
    slso be furnsshed      to resident      ---    county
    Superintendent     ---   and may be paid for
    on order of the Commissioners*            Court out
    of the County Treasury. t
    WI have not been able to find ang other statutes
    on the above question,            and thererore,      sinoe Artiole
    3899 B was passed subsequent              to Artiola       2688, it is
    my opinion     that it would not be mandatory on the
    Conrniasioners’        Court to furnish      suitable      offioes    and
    stationery     and blanks necessary          in the performance         of
    their duties,        for the County Superintendent,              but that
    the Court, in its discretion,             may furnish        the 88810 If
    they so desire.          On the other hand, Article             3899 R does
    not legislste           on office    *furniture     and fixtures”,
    and therefore       Article     
    2688 Rawle C
    . S. would control,and
    that it would be mandatory upon the Commissioners*
    Court to furnish         the “neoesaary      offioe     furniture     and
    fixtures”    to the bounty Superintendent.                 In tirls oon-
    nection , drtiole        2700 R.C.S.     makes provision8          ror Lhe
    necessary    offioe      and traveling      expenses of the County
    Super lnt ends&.         This Article     was apparently         rassed as
    amended, in 19I,3.          In tills aonneotion       it would be my
    opinion    that the Commissioners’           Court would not be
    a~;~tnorized to pay any expenses of the County Superin-
    tendent’s     office     not provided     for in said Artioles
    2688 and 3899 B R.C.S.,             but suoh 0rri00 expenses must
    be provided      for as set forth        in said Article         2700 R.C.S.”
    L
    Hon. John C. Larburger,           page    3
    Art.   2688, Vernon’s          Annotated     Civil     Statutes,
    reads    in   part,   as r0110wa:
    WThe Co.mmissioners Court of every oounty
    having Three Thousand (3,000)          scholastic      popula-
    tion,   or more, es shown by the preceding             soholastio
    census,    sLal1 et a general      election,     provide ror
    the election     of a county superintendent          to serve
    for e term 0r four (I-) years,           who shall     be a person
    of educational     atteinments,     good moral oharaoter,
    qnd executive     ability,     and who shall be provided          by
    the Commissioners’        Court with an office       in the
    courth~,use,    2nd with necessary       offioe   furniture     and
    rixtures..   ..n
    Section    2 of Article         3899B,     V. A. C. Y.,      provides:
    “Suitable      offices     and stationery    and blanks
    necessary     in the performance         of their duties     may
    under the disoretion           of the Commissioners1      court
    also be rurnished          to resiaent    i?istriat  Judges,
    resident    IJistrict      and County attorneys,      County
    Superintendents        and County Surveyors,        and may be
    paid for on orders          of ,t.he Commissioners*    kurt     out
    or the County Treasury.”
    Artiole     2688, and 3899B, V. A. C. S., authorize         the
    County Commissioners’       Court to provide   tar certain    needs of
    the County School Superintendent.         In determining     the q,uestion
    under consideration,      it is our opinion    that the roregoing
    statutes must be considered       and aonstrusd    together.
    In our Opinion        No. O-1781,         a copy      of whloh      has bean
    rarwaraea     to you, it is        stated;
    *Under Art. 2688,         it is ma~ndatory upon the
    Commissioners~         Court to furnish       the’aounty      Sohool
    Superintendent        with an offioe      and with neoessary
    office   furniture        and fixtures.       It is aisoretion-
    ary with the County Commissioners’                Court as to
    whether or not it will           provide    suitable     offices,
    and stationery         and blanks under Art. 3899B.              con-
    strui.nF, the two statutes          together,     it is our
    opinion    that the County Commissioners’               Court must
    furnish    the County School Superintendent               vith a
    suitable     office     and necessary      offioe    furniture      and
    equipment,      but may use its discretion             in the matter
    of supplying        stationery     and blanks.”
    I
    656
    Hon. John C. Marburger,      page 4
    Speoirloally      answering  the questions   presented    in
    your inquiry,     it is our opinion,      that it is mandatory upon
    the Comnissionersl        Court to furnish    the County Sohool Super-
    intendent    with an office,      and if an office    is not available
    in the oourthouse,        the Co.mmissioners~ Court must rurnish the
    County Superintendent        with an oiTioe    and pay the rent for
    such 0rri0e.
    In view of what has bsen said in our Opinion No.
    O-1781,   a portion   of whioh has heretofore    been quoted,   we
    deem it   unneoessary   to discuss further    the aatters  presented
    in your   inquiry.
    Yours   very   truly
    ATTORNZYGXXXRAL OF TIXAS
    Ardell    Williams
    Assistant.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-6145

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1944

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017