Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1944 )


Menu:
  • Ronofable H. Fat Edwarda
    Civil M&riot Attorney
    Reoords tillding
    iallas County
    Danas, Texas
    At tention: Mr. Warren S. Cook
    Eoar nir:                            Opinion Ro. o-5&1
    Rer Authority of.the Tax As-
    aoseor and Colleotor to
    issue's voter a ,duplicate,%
    poll tax receipt, ora-
    oertifioata that a person'
    has previously paid his
    poll tax; and related sub-
    jeots.
    We acknowledge the receipt of your letter of February 28, 1944,
    in which you ask the department*s opinion on the following questions:
    "(1) Is the Tax ~Assessorand Collector authorized to
    issue to a voter a duplicate poll tax reoeipt?
    :,i2) 1s the Tax Assessor and Collector authorized to
    issue certificates oartimng that a person has previously
    paid his poll tax on a certain date?
    "(3) May an eleator who has paid,his poll tax and has
    had a poi.1tax receipt issued to him vote in person at the
    regular pol.18or by absentee ballot by prassnting to the
    proper person a dupliaate poll tax receipt or a certificate
    Lssuad by the Tax ~Aseessarand Collector certifying that
    said alactor has paid his ~01~1tax on a certain data?
    "(4.; May an elector vthois exempted from paying his
    pa:1 tax and haa been issuad an exemption oertifi.cafe
    vote at an election held, by absentse ballot or in peF8On
    by presentdng to tha proper person ,a certificate issued
    by the Tax AW~SSOF and Colleotor oertiryjng that said
    person is exempted from paying a poll tax and an exemption
    aertifioate has previously been issued to him?"
    ~exaa Constitution, Article VI, Seotion 2, provides:
    Honorable H. LJatEdwards, page 2             O-5881
    I,
    . . . .that any voter who is subject to pay a poll tax
    under the laws of the Stats of Texas shall have paid said
    tax before offering to vote at any election in this State
    and hold a reoeipt showing that said poll tax was paid before
    the first day of February next preoeding suoh election. Or
    if said voter shall have lost or misplaced said tax receipt,
    he or she, as the ease may be, shall be entitled to vote
    upon making affidavit before any officer authorized to adminis-
    ter oaths that such tax receipt has been lost. Such affidavit
    shall be made in writing and left with the judge of the
    election. .... And this provision of the Constitution shall
    be self-enaoting without the necessity of further legislation.
    . . . .n
    Article VI, Section 4, of the Lonstitution empowers,the Lagisla-
    ture to make "regulations a8 may be necessary to detect and punish
    fraud and prese~a the purity of the ballot box and the Legislature
    may provide by law for the registration of all voters in all cities
    containing a population of ten thousand inhabitants or more."
    In 1904 our Supreme Court in Stinson v. Gardner, 
    97 Tex. 292
    ,
    78,s. W. 492, construing the words "hold a receipt" said:
    '"Itmight be inferred from the latter part of the quotation
    that it was intended the voter should have his poll-tax receipt
    at the place where ha voted, but there is no provision in
    the Constitution whioh requires that the reoeipt shall be
    exhibited at the time of voting. It only requires the voter
    shall hold his receipt that is, that he shall have procured and
    have possession of the reoeipt, and, if it has been lost,
    then, in order to vote, he must make the affidavit which the
    law requires. ..."
    The following year (1905) the Terrall-Election Law was passed,
    This law was a general overhauling of our election laws. Seation 66
    of the Terre11 Gleotion Laps (Acts 1st C. S. 1905, p. 533 is Article
    3004, R. S., 1925. Stinson v. 
    Gardner, supra
    , was decided under a
    prior form of the statute requiring only that the voter have a reoeipt,
    Article 3004, whioh superseded the cited quotation from that case, is
    aa follows:
    "No citizen shall be permitted to vote, unless ha first
    presents to the judge of eleotion his poll.tax receipt or
    certificate of exemption issued to him before the first day
    of February of the year in which he offers to vote. except
    as otherwise permitted in this title, unless the sine hRS
    beer,lost or mislaid, or left at home, in whioh event he
    shall make an affidavit of that fact, which shall be left
    with the judges and sent by them with the returns Of the
    eleotj.onr provided, that, if since he obtained his receipt
    Honorable H. Pat Edwards, page 3             O-5881
    or certificate he removes from the precinot or county of
    his residence, he may vote on oomplying with other pro-
    visions of this title."
    Other eleation statutes, material to the questions under disous-
    sion, are:
    Article 2966, aa amended 1941, provides:
    3s
    .*. any voter ...subjeot to pay a poll tax under the
    laws of this State, shall ... before offering to vote at
    any election in this State ... (hold) ... a reoeipt show-
    ing that said poll tax was paid before the first day of
    February next preaeding such elections ... If said voter
    is exempt from paying s poll tax and resides in a aity of
    10,000 inhabitants or more, he or she must prooure a cer-
    tifioate showing his or her exemptions. ... If such
    voter shall have lost or misplaced said tax receipt, ha
    or she shall be entitled to vote upon making and leaving
    with the judge of the elsotion an affidavit that suoh
    tax was paid by him or her, or by his wife or by her
    husband before said first day of February next preceding
    suah election at which he or she offers to vote, and
    that said receipt has been lost or misplaced. ..*a The
    provisions of this Artiols as to oasting ballots shall
    apply to all elections including general, special, and
    primary elsations; provided that a city poll tax shall
    not be required to vote in any election i?~this State
    except in oity eleations.'
    Article 2956, in part, is as follows:
    "Subdivision 1. Any qualified sleotor of this State
    who is absent from the county of his residsnoe, or be-
    aauss of sickness or physiaal disability can not appear‘
    at the poll place in the eleotion preoinat of his resi-
    dence, on the day of holding any general, special. or
    primary election, may, nevertheless, OWQ~ his vote to
    be cast at suoh ale&ion in the precinct of his residenoa
    by compliance with one or other of the methods herein-
    after provided for absentee voting.
    "Subdivision 2. Such elector shall make applioation
    for an official ballot to the oounty olerk in Writing
    signed by the elector. or by a witness at the direction
    of said elector in case of latter's inability to make
    suoh written application because of physical disability.
    Suoh application shall he accompanied by the poll tax
    receipt or exemption oertifiaate of the elector, or, in
    1is.zthereof, his affidavit in writing that same has beon
    lo& or mislaid.    l s.
    Honorable H. Pat Edwards, page 4             O-5881
    "Subdivision 8. The oounty clerk shall post at a con-
    spicuous plaoe in his offioe, for public inspection, a
    complete list of those to whom ballots have been deliver-
    ed or sent out under this Article, stating thereon the
    elector's  name, age, ocoupation, precinct of residence
    and poll tax number or exemption certificate number, and
    the date on whioh ballot was delivered or mailed'whiah
    list shall be kept up from day to day0 The applications,
    poll tax reoeipts, exemption certifiaates, or affidavits
    of loss thereof, shall also be open to publio inspection
    at regular offioe hours, but under such reasonable rules
    and regulations as the county olerk may adopt to safe-
    guard the 8~8 and to reasonably economize his opm time
    while they are in his keeping,
    II
    .   .   .   .   a
    Article 2959, stipulates that "the person when he pays it (the
    poll tax) shall be entitled to his poll tax receipt."
    Article 2968% "ExemptVon oertifioates of persons
    residing in a city 10,000 or more,
    "In the event of loss of oertifioate of exemption
    the voter may secure a reissue under his old number,
    by making affidavit of such loss before the County
    Tax Collector."
    Article 2968a. -Exemption aertificates to persons not subject to
    the disqualifiaations sat out in Artiole 2954,
    "...who (do) not reside in a city of ten thousand in-
    habitants or more, and who is exempt from the payment
    of a poll tax by reason of the faot that he or she has
    not yet reached the age of twenty-one years on the first
    day of January preoeding the levy, or who is exempt from
    the payment of a poll tax because he or she was not a
    resident of the State on the first day of January pre-
    ceding the levy, but who shall have since become eligible
    to vote by reason of length of residsnos or age, shall,
    on or before the thirty-first day of January of the yser
    in which ho or she offers to vote, obtain from the was-
    ses8or and Collector of Taxes for the county of his or
    her residenoe a certificate of exemption from the pay-
    ment of a poll tax, and no such person who has failed
    or refused to obtain such certificate of exemption from
    the payment of a poll tax shall be allowed to vote, cQD
    Honorable H. Pat Edwards, pangs5
    "In the event the exempted voter holding oertificate
    under this Article shall remove from the county in which
    he resided when same was issued, to another oour&,yin
    this State, he shall be required to present his oertifi-
    oats of exemption to the Assessor and Collector of taxes
    of the county of his new residenoe~for reissue of ragis-
    tration and endorsement at least twenty days before any
    election at which he expects to vote.
    "In the event of the loss of oertifioatm of exemption,
    the voter may seoure a reissue under his old number by
    making affidavit of such loss before the County Tax As-
    sessor and Collector."
    Penal Code, Article 216, reads:
    "Any judge of an election or primary who wilfully
    permits a person to vote, whose nems,doas not appear on
    the list of qualified voters of the preoinct and who
    fails to present his poll tax raoeipt or oertificats of
    sxanption or make affidavit of its loss of misplacement
    or inadvertently left at home, except in osees where no
    oertifioate of exemption or tax receipt is required,
    shall be fined not exceeding five hundred dollars."
    Penal Cods, Artiole 217, provides thatr
    "Any judge of any election who shall refuse to receive
    the vote of any qualified elector who, when his vote is
    objected to shows by his own oath that he is entitled
    to vote, or who shall refuse to deliver an official bal:
    lot to one entitled to vote under the law, or who shall
    wilfully refuse to receive a ballot after one entitled
    to vote has legally folded and retuned sama, shall be
    fined not to exceed five hundred dollars."
    Penal Code, Article 232, is as followsr
    "If any person knowing himself not to he a qualified
    voter, shall at any election vote for or egainst any
    officer to be then chosen, or for or against any pro-
    position to be determined by said election, ha shall be
    confined in the penitentiary not less than two nor more
    than five years."
    we *nswer your questions respectively as follows:
    First question: The statutes, Articles 2968 and 2968~~~author-
    ize the tax assessor and oollector to re-issue a certificate of exemp-
    tion when the original has been lost, but we have been unable to find
    honorable H. Pat Edwards, page   6               O-5881
    any statute authorizing that offiaer to issue a duplicate poll tax
    reoaipt.
    We therefore answer this question in the negative.
    Second question? We are not prepared to say that a tax assessor
    and collector is without authority to issue a certificate, such as is
    desoribed in this question, which may be used for some purposs, but,
    it is our opinion that ths provisions of the pertinrmt statutes quoted
    above make it obvious that suah a certificate may not be used for vot-
    ing purposes. In other rords, such certificates era not raao@zed
    by our election laws,
    Third question: In vim of our answers to your first,and seaond
    questions, it is not necessary to answer this question,
    Fourth qusatior~t We have in answer to your first question called
    your attention to the statutes authorizing the tax assessor and oollec-
    tor to m-issue a certificate of exmption.    However, there is no
    statute authoricing such officer to issue such a certifioate as is
    described in this question, and if such a certificate wme issued, it
    is not one reaognized by our election laws. Pvetherefore answer this
    question in the negative0
    Trusting that the foregoing filly answers your inquiries, we are
    Very truly yours
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    By s/David Wuntoh
    David %x&oh
    Assistant
    DAtdb:wa
    APPROVED APRIL 18, 1944
    s/Gee. P. Blaokburn
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS   (acting)
    Approved Opinion Committee By EWE Chairman
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-5881

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1944

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017