Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1944 )


Menu:
  •       OFFICE   OF THE AlTORNEY    GENERAL       OF TEXAS
    Honoreblr Walker brron
    County Attorney
    Hudrpeth Count.7
    Sierra Blmoa, TexBr
    Dear 91~1
    ion of thin de
    reada e8. follo
    vlthln   the county.
    ir quertlon, I am
    or lea*, 01 Eud8peth
    library,  and I find no
    ectr no authority  upon the Commlr-
    ~lonerr* Court to rxpend oounty fundo In the
    manner mentioned above.   Section 17 provide8 for
    cooperetlon with the U. S. Department of Agri-
    culture, and Article 2351b-2, R.C.S., provider
    that the Commlrrloners t Courta  in all oountler
    Bonorrble Walker Carson, t&e   2
    b a r ing l population from 22,050 to 23,000 u7
    aid btate and Fedex%1 Agencies, vhloh popula-
    tlon bmoket vould l    xolu@o Hudspeth Count7.
    find nothw
    "I             ln the statutes vhieh ap-
    pears  to authorire the expenditure or oount7
    funds In the mannor abovo mentioned, and there-
    fore It is 4 opinion tbt      suoh expenditure
    uould be lllogal   on the port or the Cmmls-
    sloners~ Court.
    “I vould lppreol@te an opinion trcr 7our
    offloe on this question as soon as possible,   as
    the O.?,A. has offered to lstabllsh a brpnoh
    office rlthln the oounty Sor t&e oonvenlenoe of
    those oltlsens living a oonsidenble   dlstanoe
    iroll the oount7 seat, providing the Camlsslonsrs~
    C$;~evfll   pa7 a olerk to handle suoh bmnoh
    L
    Qenenll7 speaking, our courts hsve mpeatedl7 said
    In the past that   the powers of the oommlsslonors 1 oourt and
    the offioes of counties uu llmlted to those expressly glented
    to t-    b7 the oonstltutlon  and statutes, and suoh powers as
    are neersurll7   implied fro8 those express17 granted,     (WI118
    County vs. Lapasos County, 40 S.Y. 552, 90 hr. 6031 Cmls-
    sloners~ Court of Madison Count7 vs. Walls00 et sl, 15 8.U.
    (2d) 951 Van Rosenberg, et al. vs. Lovett, i33 S.W. 5081 Cam-
    l1ss1onersa Court of Xsrrls Count7 vs. Kslser, et sl, 23 S.Y.
    (2d) 8&Oj Cit of Breokenrldge vs. btephens Count7, 120 Tziohin
    318 Co 8.W. 726) 43 Dunn-Usrren Publishing Caapan7 vs.            -
    son’Count7, 
    45 S.W. 126
    ) 6511 Hogg vs. Cargbell, et 81, 48 S.U.
    (26) 5151 and UndPun vs. Sate,     97 8.N. (a) 264)
    Ue have careful17 ocrnsldered 70~ request and find
    no authorit    vhstsoever suthorlsm    the ocnmlssloners~ oourt
    to expend oounty funds for the above mentioned purpose.      There
    fore, in the lbsenoe of a4 statute llth e express17
    r          or by lm-
    plloatlon luthorlrlng the a~lssloners~      oourt to expend oauntr
    iunds for the above mentioned purpose it Is our oplnlon that the
    Homolrble Ualker Carson;   Page 3
    oount7 ommot log4117 pn7 the a``~      ci   l   olerk    to vork in
    l bnnah ofrloe or the 0.P.A.
    Yours *em trul7
    ATTORBBY
    OEBBRAL
    OF TEXM
    BymdL
    Ardell    UIllIams
    Asslstsnt
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-5796

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1944

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017