Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1943 )

5 1 .J I r~c appliaante whvthvr the application 1s re- Sued or g``ta4 In who~v OP in port;~prwldod, thBt only rueh tax lsoxlvy&B :hEs teen colleoted bg virtue of tax levlee made P*.~tm swo%Sic purpose of providfag a oiaki~ fund OCRpayin& in~,t 00 the wtlow boqde tv bo rode@ a&all bo eqionded In the. mdaaptlon, taklq,$up, ‘or payiw oSt at euch boade ee provided in this hot; unlsse eakd bo:ids are balx rsdmumd I’m the -OS* of belni: pedwded; aad .&heopglica- t&on of .ttn boaPa of trutiteee of q OorInmU or Lndeg sndvnt lohaol rUstriot daelring to retire bond8 ae homln yrovlded &all :.olude.eu affi- dnvit to tih#i ef%ot Lz theti epplZaat~Son; end jwovided rUrtherc, that It, ehalLbe ualevful POP aaJ m yloA nhola-urj.dUtJ l'e8t#~ia a out the prwletoaB of thlB lirr to &va or re- ss$vq any 6~Esloa~ yPwdum, or aAy a-- tion nhatovati for thn pirforeieixoe of euch duty or dutloe* Fma youpe.tataarlt of iaote it appvaro tbat thB lp- puo~tiosr to t~.stdta Board OS lsdn6ati6a was mailed to tim SUIta Tpaasu~M tile the law npulmr t&v ~ovenzirsj body of bhe school die.trlot “tia make dlawot apgtlctitlon ir :;ritluy to thv 5tata mm& ‘of Rduoation at &east tnirty dry8 bvl’ore 4ny intercet PIJing date an eald bond8 + * 9.” The r4at trlat A0 muh eppl%eation ln oritl~ wae xedo to t?,wstats :305rd or A¶uobtioa thirty d4ye prior to SqAomhr 1, IV43. the intanet Wy’%a&date, apd the i’!UPthM f'RBtthat A@ fund8 had beon SOAt to the ~tat6~IfScroswar on w pqioc to eald date’ with wtsoh to #de+WthabOnUs~ oonetiliuteeubh failureonthepertof the dlothot t0 OCnpl~Ilit&the POViCiOnaOf &+tiob3 8’7EWb, as iA our opfaiqz, would ~daprlos t-ho Boer& of Eduoation of the powor to qpprove the applicat%on. ha app&loat&m eon8 to tha Skta