Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1943 )


Menu:
  •                      A,                               ,.--Y,
    NEU     GENE
    QDP     EXAS
    Honorable Donald Allurns
    County Auditor
    &-din County
    Kountze, Texas
    Dear Sir:                            Opinion No. O-5653
    Ret Appliaability of delinquent tax
    oontract executed under Articles
    7335, 7335a and 7264a, V.A.C.S.,
    to city taxes collected by the
    county tax assessor-collector under
    b-tide 1402b, V.4.C.S.
    Your opinion request of October 5, 1943, reads as followsr
    "1 would appreciate very much your opinion on the following question:
    "Where a city avails itself of the privilege of requiring the county tax
    assessor-collector to assess end collect the city taxes on the regular tax
    rolls (Article 1042b), is such oity bound by a contract between the com-
    missioners' court of the county and a delinquent tax collector?
    "Isthe delinquent tax collector entitled to his commission on city taxes
    collected by him in the above instance, when the city officials fail or
    refuse to ratify the contract?"
    pie assume that you refer to a delinquent tax collection contrnct ex-
    ecuted by the canmissioners' court under authority of Articles 7335, 7335a
    and 7264a, V.A.C.S. Although we do not know the term of the oontract to
    which you refer, we are satisfiedthat, regardless of the nature of its terms,
    both your questions must be answered im the negative.
    If the contract is on the forms cumsntrly promulgated by the Cmptrol-
    ller of Public Accounts, you will notice that the first paragraph of such
    contract provides8
    "First party agreesto employ and does hereby employ second party to enforce
    by suit or otherwise, and to aid and assist the local officers in the en-
    forcement of the collection of all delinquent State and County ad valorem
    taxes, penalty and interest, and all delinquent taxes, penalty and interest
    (exceot taxes of independent school districts and incorporated cities and
    towns) due any and all political subdivisions or defined districts of said
    county and State which the county tax collector receives and receipts for,
    under the provisions of Articles 7254 and 7257, R.S. 1925 . . ." (Fmphasis
    added).
    Honorable DonaldAllums, Pare 2 (O-5653)
    Thus if this form of contract is employed, city taxes are expressly excluded
    from the scope of the contract, and we need not inquire further into the ques-
    tion.
    If, however, the contract to which you refer does not expressly exclude aity
    taxes, we feel that the same result obtains since no contract forthe collea-
    tion of city taxes may br made by any group other than the governing body of
    the city and since such contract must be made in strict conformity with the
    provisions of the statute governing such contra&s. Article 7343, V.A.C.S.,
    provides in part as followsr
    "    . When twenty days from the date of last publication of said list of de-
    lfn&ents hps elapsed, the governing body of the city or town may direct the
    city attorney to file suits for the collection of said taxes, or said govern-
    ing body may employ some other attorney of the county to file suits and the
    city attorney or other attorney filing said suits shall be entieled to the
    same fees as allowed the county or district attorney in suits for collection
    of State and county taxes, to be taxed as costs in the suit . . ."
    For an interpretation ofthis statute, see City of South Houston V* Dabney,
    120 S.R. (2d) 436 (Comn. App. 1938) and Bell v. Mansfield Independent School
    District, 
    133 Tex. 403
    , 129 5.17.(2d) 629. We find no arithorityother than
    this for the execution of contracts for the collection of delinquent city
    taxes, and sines Article 7343 clearly provides that such contracts shall be
    made only by the "governing body" of the city, we feel that no other body
    possesses the power to execute contracts for the collection of such Baxes.
    Conversely, Articles 7335, 7335a and 7264~ define the power of a oom-
    missioners' court with respect to delinquent tax oontracts, and each of said
    Articles speaks in terms of a power to contract only for "State and county
    taxes." It is settled that the commissioners’ courts now derive their power
    to contract exclusively from these statutes, PFnitev. McGill, 
    131 Tex. 231
    ,
    114 S.W. (2d) 860; consequer.tly,* comnissioners' court posseP=es no power
    to enter into a contract affecting the collection of delinquent city taxes.
    Trusting that the foregoing fully answers your inquiry, we are
    Very truly yours
    AlTORnEYGENERALOF     TEXAS
    APPROVED OCT 14, 1943                          By /s/R.   Dean Xoorhead
    /s/ GRWER SELLERS
    FIRST ASSISTANT                                        R. Dean Moorhead
    ATTORNEY GFXERAL                                               Assistant
    AFFROVED
    RDM:fo:egw                   Opinion Committee
    By G.P.B. Chairman
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-5653

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1943

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017