Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1943 )

533
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
Honorable Wayne Leieure
county Auditor
Clap County
Henrietta, Texas
Dear Sir:
snakeadvanoe.
Tax Ataeereor
-
ir deputy rrom
und of Clay Oouaty,
or thle department
followa:
Aseeaaor-Oolleatorsol-
o be paid baok to the
st aoney oolleotsd in
re his fees or orriae.w
Artlole 3937, Vernonfa AnnotatCd Clvfl Statutea, in
part, provides: ; ','i~
*Eaoh Aaeeesor of"bhres shall reaeive the
following oompensationior hia rerviaeawhloh
shall be estImeted on the total value of the
property assessed a8 follows: For aaeeaeing
the Ytete and County Taras on ali tums for the
firat Two BlillionDollars ($2,000,000.00)
600
HoAorabla Wayne LetaUre, page 2
or le86, five (5) oenta for laoh One Hundred Dol-
lars ($100.00)0r property emseased. On all atma
in exoeaa of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00)
and less, than Five Million Dollmra (~5,000,000.00),
two and one-half (23) oentr on each One Hundred
Dcllere (*lOO.OO),end on all UUBIBin 8x0888 or
Five Million Uollars ($5,,000,000.00), two and one-
fourth (24) oentr on eeoh One &ndrsd Dallera
($lOO.OO),provided, that in aountlee in whlah the
POptiatiOA does AOt exceed tWelV8 thouarmd, five
hundred (~2,500).~r~ohabitaAts,the Asoesaor shall
receive on all siB'.for the first Four ``llllon
D0llar8 ($4,OOO:W~ibO), the aurn0r five (5)
oents ror cash One Eundred Dollspa ($lOO.OO),and
OA all aum8 sbova auoh amount the fee shall ba fia
above stated, one-hair of the above oompensatlon
shall be paid by ths %ate and one-hair by thr
County; for aseesalng the taxes on all dralnage
dietriots,road dintriots, or other politloal aub-
divisiona of the OOUAty, the Asseaeor shall be
paid three-fifths,ofova 0aAt for eaah One Eundred
Doliars ($100.00)of the aeaessed value of sucih
blatriots or 8ubdivisiona.
lt
. . . The ConxmlsaloAer8Court oh811 allow
the Assessor or taxes such suma or money to be
gald monthly from the Oountg Treaeuryaa may be
Asoaaeary to pay for olerloel work, taking asaeaa-
aentr a@ making out the tax rolls of the Ootmtr,
but auoh sumr ao allowed to be deduoted from the
amount allowed to the Assessor as oompexu5atlon up-
on the completionof said Tax roll6 provided the
amount ellowed the Asaeeeor by the Oomtleslonere
Court shall not exaeed the oompensationthat may
be due by the oounty to him for a8eessing.
n. . .
“S80. 2. It ie not the purpose of thie Aot
to ohenge the salary of Tax Assessors as now fixed
by law.'
Artiole 7181a, Vernon's AAAOtated pro-
Civil C?tatuter,
vides:
Y?ereafter,whenever the words ‘Aasessor,f
*As6esaor of Taxes," IColleotor,* 'Collsotorof
Taxes," or 'Tex Colleotor" are used, either in
Art101as 7181 to 7359, iAO1U4iVa, or Title 122
or the 1925 Revised Civil Statute8 or Texas,
601
Honorable Wayne kfeure, pege 3
lnoludlng all amendments thereto, as well ae
the Revised Code of 1925, lnoludlng all amend-
- ment, being known a4 the 1925 Revlaed Civil
Statutes of Texas, 6ame shall be applloableto
and mean the ohe office or offiaer or Aaseesar
and Collector of Tex44, and shall be so OOA-
etrued a8 to aooomplleh the objeot and intent
SAd oarry out the purpose 0r ~otlone 14 and
16 of Artlole 8, of the Texas Constitution,as
the 4ame was amended on Wovember 0, 1932. Acts
1933, 43rd Leg., p. 598, oh. 197, 85.”
The population of Clay County 14 leas than 20,000
inhabitantsaooordlng to the last federal oeneue. It is ap-
parent from the roregolng faot and your letter of request,
thereforr,that the Tax Aeeeeeor-Colleotorof Clay County
18 oompenaatedOA a fee basis.
The only authority we are able to find euthorlrirrg
the Commieaionew Court to make advancementsto the T4z Aaeeesor-
Colleotor of Clay County as aompeneatf.on is sontelned in the
above-quotedstatute. Thlo statute expressly requires the
OoaaPlesloners Court to allow euoh offleer ruoh sums of money,
paid monthly from the County Treasury, aa may be neoeeeacy "to
pay for olerloslwork, taking assesfmenteand m4king out the
tax rolls of the oounty.*
It will be seen, therefore, that such sums authm-
ire4 to be allowed as advanoemenf are measured l trlotly by
the offlaer' 8 dutlee in oouneotlon rith hla work as Aeaeeaor,
lnoluding the neoeesar olerioal work, taking,aese8ementeand
making out the tex rol1a.of the oounty and may not exa4ed the
amounts whioh may be due him by the oounty for a4seaelng under
the herein-quotedprovislone of Artiole 3937.
Since the GommlsaionersCourt $4 unauthorizedto
allow the Tax Assessor-Collectora dlrrerant OOmpeB46tiOB from
that fixed by Artiale 3937 eupra, we think it advlrableto
point out that any exoess of the enount authordeed by the
statute wculd be void and not eolleotlblefrom the ruretles
tfloer's bond. steusorr ~4. Liberty Count
8 Jeff Devls County vs. Ikvle, 192 8. 1. 2ii i$‘$o”b;,“(;a
County, 106 S. W. (2d) 768.
-
602
Bonorablo
Oatmgorloallyanmwrlng your requart, therorore,
it 18 the opinion ot this dapertment that the Commlsslonsrr
court my allow to the Tax Ammsor-Collector or Olay County
only suoh BWJ or money, to be paid monthly from the County
Trea8ury. a8 may be nroeaaary to pay for olerioel work, tak-
lng arsarementsand making out the tax rolls of the county.
Suah allovmnoe being an advanoement, ahall not aroerd the
oompensationen mey bo due him under Artlols 3937, Voraoa*a
Annotatad Civil.Statutes, ior sa8asslng and ia to bo daduotod
thrrsrrom upon the oompletion or said tax rolla by the orfioer.
Your8 rarg truly
ATTOBWEY O? TjUAS