Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1943 )

OFFiCE OF THE A?TORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
.
‘_
tionurebra 0. P. l,#QaW*t, page 2
;'ewlwith nfmwrlaeto local maual aid aaaoolat3.ona, enwted
Lrr 1929 by the 4lac Leglalatu`` ot !Fema, provideas
*For filing Arct4lea of aafsool&lcaa and ap-
proval 0r~oon0tatuti0n, bplawa tmd ce2-tlfimtea
p%o*t00rgcalaat
0f ths mwd cioiz ststut00 0r m, i925, i8
3em~lapecrledamdalll0v00ndywt0ofhim
in calfliotherewltis.Aota 1929, 4lat Leg.,
B* 563, *r 27% i 3L0
uti8le 3920, farmd b m8ptm 2, Title 61, mea 0r
wftce, Verrram’Annotated
a Texas cwll statutea, am amelded
'by theAem of tb 46thLegla&tureof~, inl939,lwada
&xpartsufollowas.
"SmBaale of x&awe C"aam%aabner6 ahall
&arge and raaelm $0~ Cl10uae of the state the
iollawug fee08 i
6 ...l
‘P e r filitlg th e a tu u a a la t& t( YDID3ta t a n ia -
aerldflaate
o a np a ny , o r in lie u th e r ea t!
:~o o ammadea~Lotr1Snl,4~fn
.12 2, 012 iS;,'j'L;J~ iwt0 1939, 46th w3., 9.3 &
f .2
Your quoatlan
raquirua the uonatPuotion of brtitieo
3920 snd -31. !me le@.@~tlOS NatorJl o? themeet%tutea
433tbmr0m ugh3.y gmamt. mm0 3920 a0 8 of the
````~i~S``~aof1925,prwided,~o ti?ertlaukg8,
thst theBoard oflamranae Comniosloneraehould ahrrrge 8 fee
0X $20.00 for fll.&g thsauaual attstement of an insuranoe oom-
,7anyor oertiilastoin lieu thereof. Axtlale 4075a-31, vu
..;,
10
3anorabla 0. 2. Wh-3
a.acted~in 2929 am a DJJ,P$Of MMte Bill 22% 81Ot Iagb&b-
.a.m orTex&a* andapeoiS``provided tlmttba Pea forfll-
ani: CLMualmporta of loaal autasal old uaoobtlona vlth usa
2onxKi or U@ hozd th6t I?rticle
&675a-31 A&l&m 3920, R.C.8., 1925,
Of !ul lnauronoe croPpcuy,or aertlflo6Se In Ueu t&emwf ma
:10tmuaged at all but vu mm304 (ufifbd ?omfardati&ra-
au%oted. Prtiol03920vae8g8uamaa&uial939``46th
s3*aaura or mua by fsetda BLu.404, vlth rampoet. to pro-
vidc3g for the 8ppwpriatbn or tha reoa mn11wd uudf~r~ the
lxlG;‘or the purpose of gcrflog aertaln 6alarlea and expetueo
jr’tEt6xnauraaaeCaadaaban. lteohangevMaladevLthm6-
pet to the $20.08 fZllng fee abme dew~Ued ‘mt ata8e vaa
M!s#lg carried rorwad amt -tad.,
ve thintr the f~ male0 or Otatuto~ lsonatrua-
ticn are Dertlnent and atdleible to mnw aueatioa. ue auoto
fmla Lewli sutheiland stitutory cona’oPtlocson,
~$igir 44lk?+
4, 524~56, 8s~follmat
*Taleoonatlt?t- pPovlalonlqublng amend-
mentoto bs lam&by 6ettLlag out the vl%aaea``
aaaluexedwaaMt~t68uledtu~
ml&' a6 to trI6 erfaot or auahmmdmaa Ti6. so far
aathereetiamiaeb8agedlt6a10tmabfvea``
operation. but 00 far am it is not ohwged It vauld
be dangerous to hold that the mm tmtZnal se-enaat-
xt6nt should have tkm effeath of d&atmblng the vbole
body or ~atatutea Zn pm% mate*is vh%ahhad bear
paawl slnoe the fint enaaMt. Them auat ba
~omethtngin the nature of the now leglalatiian to
dov such an Intent vlth maaonable oloq``wa be-
:‘om aa lriqwad mpeul aan b6 maognlmad. ‘3y
3.1
Honorable 0. ?. Lookhart, pa@ 4
%&bit ud 2+mrrtrtkt - wm0t 0s m-
sarabmnt- or f.ntemedlato aota.--Thir lub jea t
h a a a lr 6edy b 4 4 nso M ld4 r edto a 4 la 4 e x tentln
a fozsmr o h a p to ru.h 4 r 4 a B so tia a 5ended01
no la o d,a ndth efomtr aat o .xp ~4 0 o r~b yia -
pl%aetkur a lx provlalaos
r ep ea led, b h of #a al lli
la va ma r ea ub a ~t~ lwwntb o ted we dea a d
to b eoosstlnuoua.‘ALstePlWwhiohZOlPslWly
a r e-ena eta ofent
e, fc mw ~ddea not r o p a aen l
iutmaedhte eat aoh h&a Quslltiaa OF lImited
the f&at caae,but muds latemedlete eat vlll
be cl4aned ta awnal 2.13forao, and to qmZ.lfy 0~
J
L
12
Iael4 0. P. Lwkbart, Page 5
ateutl6llyr4-aaa4teditlaaaldt4ahovtbat
tbaleglaZatumbidaotr6gwdltaa mpuppant
toan lnte~to aotto 04ma oxtent aovor*
the same tubfeat. A wwtl ohdie* grmbtedIn
1857r0md0 tb40a.40rlippo~. ALL-~
l5SUd4¶.lll&59gW~pOWPtOliO4SO*lt4Ultb;
~nl87otb8ohart0~0*1857~8 -t4dend ’
th4malt6ofthsto6aextend4d. !nLlavuheld
not to repeal uAeafJtos1&59 but tebeamsre
deolaauttmthstthmrstot 1657``0 atlll In
oab we0a b80k to fa tisl* 0s ita, 0rt-
r02-430,
e-1 purrgs* seotiotl5oranwtorlravada
0s 1885 in n&ard t4 tb4 cicqmwat1onof OmIl-
tJroffl44ra rzxcd the ac6apaaaa~ a? th4 wun-
tiy0ril0et-00s ,811r
oop13tf.aaag. ths ahersff
wrksn feoa, the Biatriotattomrp a SehrJ
of $2,000 aad th0 atpeet4ad4e Or tohsolr; 8
6~ 0r $600. 34lsw8l723,1887,enaotwaa
t0gwetk0mherlfr0rEUrammtyaa~or
34,000, b llou 0s roes,. md tba asatlcm m-
enacted tnoluding the 0ahrr 0s $600 for the aU+
34sZntendent of aohwla. Lt waa held that the
JnlJ obj~00tor the 0at 0s 1887 w80 to obaagp
the caapensath 0r th0 6bm.xf to kt0tblar~,
that It did not repeal OP afroat the set of
Febrw!y,1887, and that tk~dlmtrtut nttomw
v80 not entitled to the ,aalmy 0s *SO0 (u 0x
off~oio suprlnmt 0f oMw0la. (IPnLahe'-
3WPJJ.W
It kr alaroplnicrnthat Art1010 4&756-31, enmted
In 1929, rimeled A*lole 3920, R.C.S., 1925, with mapeot
to St340r00, filiog enanN wpo~t8 OS1ooU mutufblaid rraao-
oi.atm. ft 20 our furt&* opraion that Lt vaa net the
CntatLoo0rtbs42rid~gia&huaofaxu in293ato m-
peal tb4 prev- of Adal wf*33 lrl th%P m-mast-
wt urd m 0s Brrti0b 3920. xt b w rew apin-
Ian that it vu not th4 intentian of the 46UrUgLal8tum 03
-Ttiylt pmvlalona of AaW.ole 4tPiTa-31
taimdwit’or APttile 3920.
Itl6thmeforso?lFapsrlSOntlUttlaep~Tuld
i0ga fimg r00 for fxmg tb amrmrl nport 0s s 10081.
autualSUL 88aoolatlon vlth the Bowl or Xa8umkoe Ccmmls-
slan*zYla Q5.00.
Wehasab).spe8ii%0ellyove~,~a0?kult ocm-
YU.atalmdn, the opinianto the oaav rem to la
your lettes, wrlttanby fbra.SisbtoyBmbov, AaataturtAMOP-
ney Catxewl,addr406ad to Beak*Mow4 ,StatoAuciltor
aad ?3Si%e%onap mrt# dated Fe- T'8% 1932, and m-
oordsd In Vol. 330, pages 699, ?OO-1213; lottev opinion8
of the AttOWOFCWepILJ. OSTeuO.