Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1943 )

572
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
nonorahleSldntQLatham
memty of state
Austin, Xexa~
mar Lir. Lathapt
ch s&l1 have .passeitWtFi
It is well settle& that the tiae rllowed by
canetlt``tion%l prariainn f+oz-
conslderetion of bill% ie
a xiattbr Or priVi1e@ With the (IOT0XTka!=,
rho imy w&Ye
h%E I%$!$b 20 the full per+it ZWId veto Or RppPWe fJ
bill within the allotted period. ;Uant v. State, 32
Ark. 241, 7s 8. W.769, 106 A. Sti 8. 34, 2 Ann. CRR. 33,
88 L. B.A. 71; Piokle T. m%a, 86 Tex. 3X?, 24 9. w.
26U# 26 u. C. L. 698.
While the Gmwnw retains a bill in hle
papsemion and under hia oontral titNn the 8Ilottad
pwiocl, he may moonelder hle eotion tbereonr ?mt
ihem he apprwee ti etgns a MU, end depodte it
with the 6wretwy eS $tote, the ef'ficial rspooitorJ
uf t&o OSfiOiSl sate e.f the Ornemer am3 of all lam,
he kae 'pl8oedthe bill b aad Us control anl rapl net
themaeiter rea%ll the b&l"i fWtm the Sdoretery oi
stat&s offioe for Pua%hw ootmldwation. Peon20
T. McGullou~ (IU.) '71 Ur B. 6~8~,,pLoJcLoY. ReColl,
supra; au ii. c. L. m2g 119 c. 3. mt.
Very truly rows