Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )


Menu:
  • Honorable E. Y. Cunningham
    County Auditor
    Navarro County
    Corsicana, Texas
    Dear Sir:              Opinion No. o-4985
    Re: Under the facts submitted may the
    appointed County Treasurer of Nav-
    arro County accept the salary of
    $1.00 a year as set by the Commla-
    sioners' Court, and related ques-
    t ions?
    Your letter of recent date requesting the opinion of
    this department on the questions stated therein reads ln part
    as followa:
    "We have a very unusual situation that Is
    about to develope in the office of the County
    Treasurer, which is as follows:
    "The duly elected County Treasurer is going
    ,totake the oath of office on January lst, 1943
    and then immedfately resign. My understanding of
    the law is that this office being vacated, it be-
    comes the duty of the Commissioners Court to fill
    this vacancy, They plan to a point some one who
    will be willfng to serve for $1.00 per, This of-
    fice has been paying a salary of $1,200.00 per
    The commlasloners Court plan on applying
    ````0$1,199.00 on a donation they expect to make
    toward the operation of a City-County Health unit
    which is to start operation January lst, 1943.
    "I would apprecfate very much your gfving me
    a rulfng on the following questions:
    "May the appointed County Treasurer accept the
    salary of $l,OO per year as set by the Comnlssion-
    ers Court, May the Commissioners legally apply
    this $1,199000 toward thefr donatlon for the opera-
    tion of this health unit? Or can the appointed
    County Treasurer accept the salry of $1,200.00
    per year and then make this donation to the unit
    Honorable E, Y. Cunningham, page 2          o -4985
    directly, or should they turn the $l,lgg.OO back
    to the County and then let the County in turn ap-
    ply these funds toward the City-County Health unlit
    as a part of their budget obligation toward this
    unit, and would the Commissioners Court have the
    authority to so apply these funds when turned back
    to the County by the County Treasurer?
    "Uthe   County Treasurer may serve for a fee
    of $l..OOper year then may this office receive com-
    missions from the various funds, not to exceed the
    $2,000.00 per year, for operating expense of the
    office of the County Treasurer?
    Navarro County has a population of 51,308      inhabitants
    according to the 1940 Federal Census.
    Section 13, Article 3912e, Vernon's Annotated Civil
    Statutes, reads in part as follows:
    "The Commissioners' Court in counties having
    a population of twenty thousand (20,000) inhabi-
    tants or more, and less than one hundred and ninety
    thousand (lgO,OOO) inhabitants according to the last
    preceding Federal Census, is hereby authorized and
    it shall be its duty to fix the salaries of all the
    following named officers, to-wit: . 0 . treasurer
    0 D 0 Each of said officers shall be paid in money
    an annual salary in twelve (12) equal installments
    of not less than the total sum earned as compensa-
    tion by him In his official capacity for the fFsca1
    year 1935, and not more than the maximum amount al-
    lowed such officer under laws existing on August
    24, 1935; . . 0 0"
    You do not state in your letter the amount the County
    Treasurer earned in his official capacity for the fiscal year
    1935 * However, the Commissioners' Court of Navarro County has
    no legal authority or right to fix the salary of the County
    Treasurer at any sum or amount less than the total sum earned
    as compensation by him in his official capacity for the fiscal
    year 1935, and not more than the maximum amount allowed such
    officer under laws existing on August 24, 1935.
    In the case of Williams v. Caas County, 147 S,W. (2)
    588 in construing Section 13 of Article 
    3912e, supra
    , the court
    said:
    Honorable E. Y, Cunningham, page 3           o-4985
    ” 0 D s  Section 13 of said legislative act
    is applicable to Cass County, and authorLzea the
    Commlasioners' Court to fix the salaries of the
    county officers,   including that of the treasurer,
    at a sum not less than the 'total sum earned as
    compensation by him In his offlclal capacity for
    the ffscal year 1935.' 0 . 0 ."
    In the case of Nacogdoches County v. Jinklns;~l40 S.W.
    (2) 901 construing Section 13 of Article 
    3912e, supra
    , it was
    stated In part:
    1,
    0 . 0 The terms of the,statute author1zlng
    the Commissioners' Court to fix the salary at any
    sum not less than a certain minimum and not more
    than a certain maximum, were mandatory and could
    not be ignored by the members of the court at
    their discretfon. The order fixtng appellee's
    salary at $2,750 was without authority and void.
    11       " (Also see the case of Nacogdoches
    County'v: Winder 140 S.W. (2) 972 construing
    Section 13 of Article 3912e).
    In view of the foregoIng you are respectfully advlsed
    that the Commissioners' Court has no legal authority to fix,
    the annual salary of the County Treasurer at the sum of $1.00
    per year, You are further advised that the offIce of the
    County Treasurer cannot receive commissions from the various
    funds In any amount for operating expenses of the office.
    There is no statutory or constitutional provision authorizing
    such procedure.
    Article 4436a-1, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, au-
    thorizes the Commissioners' Court of any county in this State
    contalnlng an Incorporated city having a population of not less
    than 90,000 inhabttants and not more than 120,000 inhabitants,
    as shown by the last preceding Federal Census, and the City
    Council of such city to cooperate in forming a city-county
    health unit and combine the health units of each political sub-
    division for such purpose, and appropriate funds to the com-
    bined health unit In such proportion as may be agreed to be-
    tween said Commissioners' Court and said City Council. This
    statute also authorizes the Commissioners' Court and City
    Council after having determined by resolution and joint action
    of the court and the City Council that it is to the best ln-
    tereat of the county and the``'citg
    to cooperate with one or
    more counties having a population of not more than 15,000 in-
    habitants in the operation of a health unit, to cooperate w,ith
    such county or countlea under such arrangement as may be en-
    Honorable E, Y. Cunningham, page 4           o -4985
    tered into between the City CouncLl
    _..    and the Commissioners'
    Court of said city-county health unit and the Commissioners'
    Court of said county OP counties, Any county having a popu-
    lation of not more ,than15,000 Fnhabitants which desire to
    Cooperate with any city-county health unit created under the
    terms of the Act, may, through action of its Commissioners'
    Court, cooperate with said city-county health unit as provided
    in the Act,
    As Navarro County has no city having the population
    designated in the statute and as said county has more than
    15,000 inhabitants accordfng to the last preceding Federal
    Census the statute (Article 4436a-1) is not applicable to
    Bavarro County,
    Article 4434, Vernon's Annotated Civfl Statutes, pro-
    vides:
    "The munfcfpal authorities of towns and cities,
    and commisafoners courts of the counties where&
    such towns and cities are situated, may co-operate
    with eac'hother in making such Improvements con-
    nected wfth safd towns, titles and counties as said
    authorities and courts may deem necessary to im-
    prove the public health and to promote efflcient~
    sanitary regulatfons; and, by mutual arrangement,
    they may provide for the construction of said im-
    provements and the payment therefor."
    1.twill be no,tedthat this statute does not authorize a
    city and county to coopera,tein forming a city-county health
    unit as authorized by Ar~tfcle4436a-,l,
    Article 4492, Vernon's Annotated Cfvfl Statutes pro-
    vides:
    "Any commissroners court may co-operate with
    and join the proper eu,thor?itfesof any city having
    a population of ten i.:howsandpersona or more In
    the es~ablishme~t,buildin~,,e,quipmentand maln-
    tenance of a hospI,kalin said cftg, and to appro-
    priate such funds as may be determined by said
    court) af,ter joint conference rfth the authorities
    of such cfty or town, and the management of such
    hospital shall be under the joint control of such
    court and cfy au.thorItiea."
    AS we understand 'yourrequest, the question of the
    county and city cooparatfng in ,theestablishment, building,
    equfpment and mainteneinceof a hospftal Is not presented.
    .   -
    Honorable E, Y. Cunningham, page 5           o-4985
    In view of the foregoing you are advised that cltlea and
    towns may cooperate to improve the public health and to promote
    efficient sanitary regulatlona as authorized by Article 
    4434, supra
    , and to establish build, equip and maintain a hospital
    as provided by Article 
    4492, supra
    , but that Navarro County
    has no authority to cooperate with the City of Corslcana to
    establish and maintain a cltg-county health unit under Article
    4436a-1, or any other statute we have been able to find.
    FOP the purposes of this opinion we do not think it
    necessary to discuss the proposition as to what the County
    Treasurer may do with his salary after he has earned and re-
    ceived the same.
    Trusting that the foregoing fully answers your inquiry,
    we are
    Yours very truly
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    By s/Ardell Williams
    Ardell~Williams
    Assistant
    AW:mp:wc
    APPROVED Jan 12, 1943
    s/Gerald C. Mann
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    Approved Opinion Committee By s/BWB Chairman
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-4985

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1942

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017