Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )

. . .. ; v...:... OFFICE OF THE A?TORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN 8ald stkawa41doss not *uWimo ths appeintment ef a utw phur ior the +otwt judge. IR bU porkof WII r%m$omontwe dlwot yeur actoRJ on to bur opiaE:ol¶#Roll.em262 nnd e-l&J&, oopirr crf whiah are mzuloasxi l’oryour aanvszt~anoa. Therefers,‘In view of what fs Ml& in l&o above EaeR- ticmld0 taioas arbathe abova,olted citcttut~a fro0Irm eavi6Oa that It Ys OUT oplniorr t&et the pntvlsians OS Azf&LoIs~ 391Pe - (papagraph a) wtid emtrol arid the paymitt&or a utunographer tar the ocwity jut&o waild be ovemofl b;r the s&d% You are turther sdrlned that krtiale 3802, hau 1~)applioetionttvthe quesu@R URder oonsMePatlcm, Trur6ingthab the forogaln@rully annwsrryaur ln- qd.Py,we are Yours very trray A’CR2RR?Z CUERJZRAt QY l!K&W