Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )


Menu:
  • OFFICE ()F
    THE ATTORNEY GENERALV
    AUSTIN,TEXAS
    _ umw 1.. 4\1\,¢4.
    ”WF* Bwr!.mmm ar mmc Wi¢
    m hall
    gm apwu no. o-A.s§o ._
    nn '°°“- ’ R¢¢ dmtmtioa x gaining
    `` ' `` `` wmata er m m m,-
    H‘n* ma *?i:»h mill¢tm,
    f
    m wh:.§§'m"w§&““? ‘* m"'°“ “vmv¢ m d l
    am M”M"¥W¢¥mmm
    M£¢l¢lkotm¢w.l _
    I‘NW £lmmm
    submit
    -**-*``- damnum d
    W¢,wim umw m
    - Ww - »v:mj{_f“~¢i;- §§
    x ;H~mmwg'§»
    mo.x..l.veooe,ragez
    dleboreerenoe tree eeld eoeoonve ellen he
    rode only too the epeei!led purpose for .
    wloileoohmooeyvme moved. lt wallbe
    oneetul for eny county school euperlnvend-
    eov or the eoperlnvendenv ot any canon or
    independent ewool dlevrlov, eohool veeoller,
    county vrueiee, end/or dlevrlot vruevoe,or
    eny other perean to oeo or promlee to oee,
    Pl!o!' oxide to Pd!, W d the tunde herold
    ap ted for tile purpose of peyng the
    a or expense ot eng person or per-
    ewe ne vein e lobby for ear porpoee."
    iii-proper commotion ot thin erilole lo connection
    with lie_pr setting la the dev ee e whole le, we vhlllk,
    that e district le ineligible for eid end well nov
    receive the none when lt hen violeted:ny provision or the
    oath in eohevonvlal end neverlelre mevor,
    your attention to d lou willoh notionre ee
    almolw to one peneluy olson and wich, theoretically
    dileo wouldee o noone whereby e violation may he dorl-
    ' `` -~a Seoilou 2 ot mined prwlhlve vile nee of looel
    toode et e district to immee the eelwleo ot veewer_e'
    ehovewho``eele cohndoleprovidedtorlnihe dov. motion
    assertion prohihlvroheoeeo¢equallzeolon rosario
    larsen vile eelerlee or oenwere ee eoohori.ze.d in
    the dod lt _ie. further lord thai todd provided for
    lowe 'i wellhe for the enluelve porooeeot er-
    _ieod:l.ng the length d vile eohool torn or vile ewoole situated
    lnvhedleirleireeelvln¢eoweldeooheheelede ewed~
    y ieew_erl* ulerle'e ee determined byron dieie herd
    dr mention for weewool yeer l938~39, - m inv memo
    of meeles ad ervinl'em mprovldee ee tunnel
    *_Bhoul¢_.dily dohool dowd m id
    he d!eoilveorothen¢lee improde
    where vhevloJ-eii.eoo§ pe,ylnluoreeeedaelar_leem
    - -_rr.veenherdlypbeeeldthevehwvhloneeeell
    rio m eleo the invest oct tile lemmon to invoice
    provision or miele m. l‘o other then vhle
    m ot vlokvlon, lt laour opinion hunt the penalty pro»
    we tor.;eiooro here helm oooeldered le nov ill
    me sue A'e gmi M 3
    ide-ddiwdotvhetorteivoreofeuevedr oluthodie-
    vrleiine¢uoheeoeeeeioreqoirenovioe' ‘he#rlddhwm
    the deele_reilm or fined nomination ot e forfeiture ind
    wooden ,ivlelnvhemeo¢'ewnniot-eli¢hl!»
    -liy for the el eovhorlred to die dievrlet~e. m ingle-
    lemeheeeedeoerveioe -mvooeroeineehool
    dlev:deve,vhevmoi' vyd'whlehdiovrioie_ere
    eeiwt:s§ud:¥eeevneklngw;.epp§:prl:viw. Iiiee'leelen-
    very‘- -_ y oremgeeeo w undernep;n~o)ri.e~_
    iiw hll]., thom-d the hill-vama '.;€'.hererm,ir
    a district is ineligible to receive uid, no moneys eeo legol~
    lybe-mnied vothedletrioi omervhehlll.
    = me legislation hoe ned the reepooeihlliiy"ot
    emhleverin¢vhehlllloihe '_he. rinvwdeoveodthe
    wave heard lot museum miele 11 not provides in
    port or tomas
    _ *zz mall ne err uaw or eha rule sua-
    intendment rome mmwm, ead ho le here-
    geothermal tongue row roles end resolutions
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-4950

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1942

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017