Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )


Menu:
  • HonorableGeorgeH. Sheppard
    Cantroller of PublicAcoounta
    .A&in, Texas
    Opinion,Ro.o-488a        ',
    Be: Paymentof sO$ of Stat&ad
    valoremtaxes oiSan,Jacinto
    and Walker Countiesdonatedto
    'San JaolntoRiver Cdtiervation
    ,an&RecimnatlonDietrictby
    H. B. 1079,Act8 46th L&E-
    latureupon deoielonby Texas
    SupremeCourt thatI3.B. 89,
    Acta 46th Legislature remit-
    ting all,St&e edvalorem taJras
    of aald oountlesis umonsti-
    tutiona1.
    Dear Sir:
    SenateBill No. 89, Acte 1939, 46th Legislature provided.that
    80 much of the State ad valorem taxes in ten east Texas counties,including
    San Jacintoand Walker Counties,shouldbe donatedto the reapeotive
    countiesas might be necessaryto reimburseaaid countiesfor the loss of
    tax revenuesoocaalonedby the purchaseof Lqge acreageof out over
    timber landaby the FederalGovernmentin said couxities.
    House Bill No. 1.076,Acts 1939, 46th Legislatureprovidedfor
    the donationof fifty per cent of the State ad veloremte.xeaIn Sen
    Jaclnto and Walker Countiesand part of LibertyCounw, for ten years from
    September1, 1939, to the SanJaolnto River Conservationand Reclamation
    Dietriot,and said Act containedthe followingprovision:
    ,,
    . . . provided,however;that the tsxes herein donatedand
    granted in the Countiesof Walker and San Jacinto shall not apply,
    nor be allocatedor donated'lnthis Act, until the provisionaof
    SenateBill No. 89, passed at the RegularSessionof the Forty-
    eixth,Legislature,become inoperative. . . . *
    Senate Bill No. 89 was made inoperativeby the decisionof the
    Commisalonof Appeala of Texas in the c.aeeof State V. AngellnaCounty,
    et al, 136Tex. 247, 150 S.W. (26) 379, wherein the Court held said Act
    to be unconstitutional.
    HonarableOeorgeH.Shepperd -page 2 (O-4888)
    of &an Jaolnto
    You advlie ua that the Tax Aeeeseor-Qolleotore
    and Walker Countieehave ainoe September1, 1939,remittedall of the
    State ad vaInram tame frcs theeo two countiesto you, and that the mme
    have been depositedin the State Treasux$. You inquire"what procedure
    shall be foltied in remittingto such dietrioteae t&es that have been
    paid into the State Treasury?"
    It is our opinionthat the donationof 50% of State ad valorem
    taxes frufiSenJaointo and Walker Countiesto the San JaointoRiver Con-
    servationand ReoleavxtionDietriotae providedby H. B. 100.1076 Is a
    valid exerciseof leglslstiveauthority. BraeosRiver Coneervationand
    ReaLsnationDistrictv. MoCraw, 1.26Tex. 506, 91S.W; (2d) 665. When
    5. B. 89 vae declaredunconstitutional, 5C$ of the State ad valoremtaxee
    collectedin SanJaointo and Walker Countiesehorlphave been paid to the
    treasurerof the San Jwinto River ConmervatlontiBeclmkation District
    as providedby H. B. lo. 1076. Such went     shouldNereafterbe 80 mede.
    But as to the moneys heretoforepaid into the StateT~--
    slougherroneously--theeoannotnowbewlthdraunandpaidover to the
    San JaointoConeervetfcaand ReolemationDietriotwithouta epeoifia
    appropriationby the Legialattieauthorizingsuch payment. Manion v.
    bdbrt,   Ul Tex. 175, lit4S.W. (26) 2x6.
    APPROVEDNOV. 20, 1942               Your0 very truly,
    /E/ Gerald C. Mann              ATlQ``oEAERALOFTEUS
    ATlWRilR   ORBRRALOF TEXAS      By /a/ Walter B. Kooh
    Walter R. &ok
    APPROVED0PlliIoN o-                        Amitlttult
    BY /a/ B.W.B. QEAIRMM
    ld-ds
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-4888

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1942

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017