Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )

OFFICE OF THEATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN RonorableAlbert J. Hutsoa, Sr. county Attorney Trinity County c7moeton. swaa teabent of publie inatruati&a lc aa selatant the authorityto ap- 14 drawn against nehool dfatrlota 01 5. Art. 2693. eposltory bank of a rchool dl8trlot a logal* drawn warrant, that ha ,011. been approved by aa ASSXS‘EUSTSuperintendentof ?ublic Instruotion,an4 euoh warrant was f6r the benefit of tho sohool dlstrtot, would the sohoal dlstrlot bs authorlmd to rac)ovOr the aoney paid on suoh warrant from the Uep~sito`` baatrO HonorableAlbert 5. Hutson, Jr., Page 2 "1 think the anrrwefto thle quostlon is *no*. Gem kfoodyvs. Chosrhrr, 183 LX. 23. Vour pmnpt an8wera to the above question8 will be greetlg t@preo16teU.w In vlmr of the prorlelon'of the state Constiixtlon oited in your letter and the holdiq of the .iupreneCw.rt in the casa or Carpenter ~8. Shrppard.et al,-,1453. :v.(26) 562, St la the opinion or this dbparta@nC that your rirst :ilmtion should ba answered in the efflnnatlv~sad is SO answered. -+tillnkthat nr ur eeooJl& qusstloa an4 third quution me anawen4 in our opi ona Nos. O-1507 an&O-1507-A. There- fore, we are scoloaing oopler o!'them oplnlotm in answer to thee0 questions. Ye dLS0 ~biOmt3 0Opi0~ Qr OUr ~Opik``9 NO& 0-604-A ad C-3295 pertainiry to similar guaetfona rwardlng a ooubty ~ckool superintendentunder tha faots state4 In tIma@ uplnlone. Trusting that the foregoing fully ansvmra your in- qulry,we rre