Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )

ltre%o lwl lw @mrlty wer nmlgable rrtwaw, falledtoobtalrimwh~ onl aad Itr 8ot1on the atate. T d tha6 ltete The oourt he pollee ``euo ui, &$plloable to ageaoler md omploymerof the 4 o mr a mmt wb ealuo h a g e nder a ud emp lo y e aers e ea r * lq o p muo ih tlalxelualre4 mr rithia~the paver of the United steer. __...’ .. 2he law prlaolple he0 oowiatea``beei enutolatd .~dourt ia otherbwear In ohto f*.Thoaw, 17-3 0.8. 276 the State of @alo objeoted kaaue oloomargutlne wm sed:t0’&tee oLr*fede~alrol4iuB’hoael~t84fnOhio ooqtrup to a rtite rot regmlat the 060 of 0leawrprAne. ..h reJeotlq tblm objection, 30 urt rudr th@ .~ ..:: , ‘. .. ;- ‘:. al Jaharoa t* St&e Of narplmi, 254 ua. 81 &w) ~skk``rtea~ooa*i6ted~e``e ortho Po&OS- ~floe38partmeat ior trwuwW.ag mll over roada In Harplaud rithoot hw* flrrt been emmined8nd o b ta h e dl drlver~i ilk eenw fr o 8th eStats. IareYf~fn;g thb OoPtlOtiOn,I&. Jim-’ tioeX0&18 roidt.. . _, "It leemo to umthat the rrwrmity of the of the United Water foam 8tato ooa- riormtkaoeof their dutier extenda s: .~.. sua8tanoo8~the polioe power oi the State ha8 90. lp p lio a tio .. In& ma er ting .n. th a th t iro ff%- o era mlear usho ir ewta to ‘ia no er exemp frto ath e rtate l&v, the United Stator am not UuCeW olaia- lag jw~adiotion wer thla tieularplwe of unst, in o#paition to tha Yangwge o? the aot &‘ Oongre88 o&bag baok tha jurirdiatlon the TIntted : ,:; state,reoeiWedfremthe stat& The overzllllbnt $8 bat &d.dng tht at8 mm oH$o8r8,. de P dlSeh6r~- lngdutler underPeder8l l&harit~p ur r uatont .- a nd br vlrtw oi valid #‘e&ml kv8, me not wubjeot to wrest or other ZlrrOilltytin&~ the Sam & the State In rbioh kheir du%iosurn pesfm.”