Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Bomrsble &wtslle HoDDM`` DiotrietAttorn.? Bi( spring, Tax*5 ?our rrpuert for rull,~ ccnel4rr.4 bf tair aur8t 68 follower pinion thfr auemtlon pntioaelJ drew2 ot by the t&e- 54 back to the oeaberr that have nca the law lr uncoosti- rrnt ba.rtr< IA,-onthe $usstlOC u pleame sdriss a~ about ttlr sttsr.’ Opinion lo. O-4lW of thl8 4o$nrthent , a44raseod to you, dated April 1, 104L, hold Bwee Bill 744 Of the 47th Logllilaturo UnaDnrtltutioMl. Thim 8ot war a lDCS1 aot pro- viding ~SO.cO per month tr8~vdingsx’p%~esefor tb+ countf jUdg# end aounty otidnlOQerD. one aaction Of the eat l?- plied to Martlo County, T*xsD, a10rMJ. L. ..^ -- ... . ..-.__.. ._ __ _- ______..-_ __ -_-. --..- ..-.. --....-.. ..-__ .---^..-_ _I _,.- ___^__._. ___.__.. _ pomorabla Eartoll. ~aDozml4, PI6* t Vtuler tbr muthorltlo8 sited and 8208 t&o r*88oa- 14 of oplnionr o-351 and O-4431 of thla drpnrtmult, ROI. rap188 ef uhlah mm loslosod herawithrar rour lntoraatlon, it 18 our oplalon thst tha asPbar el the romml88lonar8* eoart of Yartlo county u&o h&d rraolvrd amnate frm Martin county under the rbmo drrarlbed unoonstltutloorl act rould b e liti: fo r l r *fJnd 01lu’ 8uah monoyr rrealrrd by thorn fr o 0th edata th y wa r e lrloed ti it8 uaoonrtltutionaft~ by rlther tha OountJ attorney, di8triat attsrm) or Attor- W, oweral of Sexaa. Very truly your8