Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 6Ff %%I!3 AUSTIN PlaInvIew, Texas Dear &II. Tibbete: oertain offioiale in Hale County estion, we assume salary payments ur second qnsetion, you ara ad- vtsed that k should afthhold the Viotorp alary payzmi3nta. The amount or r oent of the Wary paid by Hale the withholding deduction provid- Federal Aot. Eaoh agenoy paying salary to the ofrioial is to be treated as an employer under the hot, and*hould with- hold the tax from its payments. Thera Is no provision in Eoaorable Xrneet Tlbbets -- p8@ e . the Aat for apgortlonlnfl the withholdi% deduotions khan the employee irr pai~d by ~xore than one ,erployar; oonse- quently the full wlthhol4ln~ deduction f.n to be sllow- ed by caoh employer ir! omputinF the aAmountof salary jaid by It subject to the tar. Tbis,~ ae are ll;formed, is the rule which is beicg applied by the Collmtora oi Internal Asvenue. . Very truly yours ATTOIMm ~SiXZi&4LOF 'TEXAS A.X.Y.-LG? &lc10suw Approved J.an 4, 1943 Gerald C. I- (a) Attorney Ganeral,~o~ Texae APPROYE!iOFIl'ZIOIZ CQMPTIGE By B.W.R. CFM?.ImAT4(8) .~