Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )

. : OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Bonereblr Dorumn Xirkrlr Coaaty Attormy Wharton county nmrtoa, fuar Dur tart 88 ha+8 ?8orl+84 l8ktho opfnlon of thir yo u tiont pmdent Bohool Dlrtriat up118 lttuiciry orore balng all l a 0r p ida dr o ? t18a o f 801 & 1 8F w . .‘,, ;-? c .-) A8 you pOlat44 t?Ut la pur brld, la the aerr of Tupe InQ4,psndgntSohool.f;istrlot,97 9. s. (24) 1047,(W. 8. Ref.)'t.hIsprovision ~80 held to be applloabls to al1 tfper of indep8nd8nt 6OhOQ1 dintriots. Zn Volu;le37 of Tare6 JurIapru4entm, fag08 lOb* 1070, it I8 said1 Wherr 8X8lUII1VeotitFO1 at tb. pub110 Q@bO818 of 8 oity or Ulstrlat lr &iv~,n to ita board ot s4uoation or tru8tBea, with power to eatablleh all rU’LQ8 8ml reguh- tiQh’I8 XIm8688Ery to X8fISt%fn 413 &ffefQnt 878tsl, 8w rogiul~tioafAtQttd84 mb re88ombl~ Otienl8t84 to prevent t&e fntroductlor! or s rmU of a eeatagioua 8ad 4r~mvnt8 di88666, 8UQh *IIMnl fpOX, l8 W411 Withia t&4 pm-8 pmteQ. Sohool b48rd8 0~69 adninIstzwtlon or the aftairm of r4pufrr the VaOaiMtfon ot pupils *I f~ oanditbo prsoadent to thlr SttQi?h.ll88. And W48l’ their pw to @naab adfxira088 for the proteotioa of health, Z#&&rlatire b&lea o? aualol- palitier may deny 6hIldren the ii&ht to attoad 8obos1 tiosr Treainatad. Ordlnaaoer rcrdr4gttletioaa of thl8 MtUX8 are not in oontrsreatlen at ISOti8tftUtiOttitl &taran- ti88, l0r &O they iXitWfOl?8With the 0~8JlntiOS at th0 o4mpubOrf rohaol law. Her are the raguletiotm objaotltm- 8ble On tha -mud tbnt 130eS&br~Uiayui8t8; it 18 not l qusatioa of WQr~QnOy, but I qU88tboa Wh4th4P the b48rd.8 l6tlo n1 6 a r b itr a r y. "'lt Is not BW4J68aXy for Ba 4pia4m.h t4 WI8t or be fmminult In otiex for the rob-1 .board to be jwtli~sb In ado,-tin&and sntoraing t&s rqplatio~ . . . lf the e~aaUItIaorare suoh that they eQn8tftut4 a aQnao8 to the publio health.'" That the bOePd of’ tFU8tQQ8 Of aa ftldspsad~t 8QhQOl dietriot lpoy under Itn sathority to mtna~g8mQ aontrol the public 8OhW1s In sueb di8triOt ?'O$uiZ'6 7a@4iXWtf46 Of PUP118 a8 a prarcpfsitc tQ thrlr atte!xdanoe of ruoh roboo18 ha8 been aotsr&nsd In the iOllowlrt,- alllmt Strft*l et al. t. Ban haton &h-l. Bd3x4 of Yrlnoatlon at el., 2f;l8. iv.Llj&(8.%Ret~ 1 Clt? g,yi Eh'aunrel8at al. v. ?irld~olmIdtat al., 109 TIXI 302, . ::,303r Johnso* et al. v'te1ty 2r 3allas at al., 291 s.i;. 972. (a, 2. 3i8i8a.) ft 1.8not acoasaary th:& aa anreriwncy crxiet: it $8 e quccatfon whsthsr tha slatIon of tha, boar4 ia aequlpln(al raoolmttlon IS rns8anab18. Booth et 81. v* Board of ?auaqtion of Port .