Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )


Menu:
  •       .’
    Honorable Ben Ji Dean
    District      Attorney
    Breckenridge,Texas
    Dear Sir:                              Opinion No. 0-4462
    Re:. Should the county treasurer
    stakeup the warrant and issue his
    aheck on the depository to the
    payee of the warrant orshould he
    simply endorse the warrant as
    prescribed by Article 2554, Vernon's
    Annotated Civil Statutes, and
    deliver it to the payee and let
    the payee present the warrant to
    the depository,and a related
    question?
    Your letter of February 27, 1942, requesting the opinion of this
    department on the questions stated therein reads as follows:
    'The procedure for the paying of county warrants in
    Stephens County is that when the same are presented to
    the County Treasurer he registers the warrant, and, if
    there is sufficientfunds to pay It, he issues a check
    as County Treasurer on the county depository.
    "Article 1713, R.   S., provides that: 'The County Treasurer
    shall not pay any   money out of the county treasury, except
    in pursuance of a   certificateor warrant from some officer
    authorized by law   to Issue the same.'
    "Prior to 1937, the law provided that county warrants
    should be presented to the County Treasurer and that he
    should draw his check upon the county depositoryand take
    up the warrant. Article 2554, R. S.
    "This article was amended when the county depository law was
    amended In 1937, and It now provides that upon presentation
    to the County Treasurer of 'any warrant, check or voucher
    or order drawn by the proper authority, if there be suffi-
    cient funds for the payment thereof on deposit in the
    Honorable Ben J. Dean, Page 2   o-4462
    account against which such warrant Is drawn, to endorse
    upon the fact of such instrument,his order to pay the
    same to the payee named therein and to charge the same on
    hi.8books to the fund upon which it is drawn.’
    “Article 2552, R. S., as amended, says In part: ‘It shall
    be the duty of the depositoryor depositoriesto pay, upon
    aresentment ai the county seat of the countyI or in case of
    time deposit to pay upon presentmentafter the expiration
    of period of notice agreed upon, all checks or warrants
    drawn by the County Treasurer upon the funds of said county
    deposited with said depositoryor depositories,as long as
    such funds shall be in the possessionoftsuch depository
    subject to such checks or warrants.l.And, under the same
    article, failure to pay the same subjects the depository
    to 10% forfeiture.
    ‘Article 1634,R.S., provides In part as follows: ‘The
    County Treasurer shall keep accurate, detailed accounts
    showing all the transactionsof his office, and all warrants
    by him paid off shall be punched at the time he pays them’
    “It thus appears that formerly It was the duty of the County
    Treasurer to Issue his check In payment of warrants, but
    that under amended Article 2554 he is to ‘endorse upon the
    face of such instrument his order to pay the same to the
    payee named therein.I Other statutoryprovisions above
    referred to leave the question in doubt as to the proper
    procedure after the warrant reaches the County Treasurer’s
    office. I should like to ask the following questions:
    “(a) Should the County Treasurertake up the warrant and
    issue his check on the depositoryto the payee of the
    warrant or should he simply endorse the warrant as pre-
    scribed by Article 25% and deliver it to the payee and
    let the payee present the warrant to the depository?
    “(b) Is the county depositoryauthorizedto pay the check
    of the Treasurer drawn by the Treasurer to take up the
    warrant?”
    It will be noted, as stated above, that prior to 1937 it was the
    duty of the county treasurer, upon the presentationto him of
    any warrant drawn by the proper authority,If there was money
    enough In the depository belonging to the funds upon which said
    warrant was drawn and out of which the same was payable, to draw
    n   _-
    Honorable Ben J. Dean, Page 3, 0-4462
    to draw his check as county treasurer upon the county depository
    In favorof the legal holder of said warrant, and to take up
    said warrant and to charge the same to the fund upon which it was
    drawn. However, when Article 259, Vernon's Annotated Civil
    @tute, was amended (Acts 1937, 45th Legislature,   p. 1298, ah.
    , sec. l), it was made the duty of the county treasurer upon
    the presentationto him of any warrant, check, voucher, or order
    drawn by the proper authority, if there were funds sufficient for'
    the payment thereof on deposit in the account against which such
    warrant was drawn, to endorse upon the face of such Instrument his
    order to pay the same to the payee named therein and to charge the
    same on his books to the fund upon which it was drawn. The act
    as amended further provides that the county treasurer shall not
    make an endorsementupon any warrant, check, voucher or order,
    upon any funds deposited with said depositoryor depositories
    which are designatedas "time deposits" until after notice Is
    duly given and the time has expired as required In the contract
    of said depositoryin designating said funds as "time deposits."
    We have carefullyconsidered the statutes  mentioned In your
    inquiry in connectionwith other statutes, and it is our opinion
    that when any warrant drawn by the proper authority Is presented
    to the county treasurer the warrant should be endorsed by the
    county treasurer as prescribed by Article 2554, Vernon's Annotated
    Civil Statutes, and dellvercd to the payee and the payee should
    present the warrant to the depository for payment.
    In reply to your second question, by virtue of Article 
    2554, supra
    , it is our opinion that the county treasurer Is not
    authorized to draw a check upon the county depositoryand to take
    up a warrant drawn by the proper authority, but, under the above
    mentioned statute, It Is the duty of the county treasurer to
    endorse the warrant as prescribed by Article 
    259, supra
    .
    In connectionwith the foregoing, we direct your attention to
    Article 1661, V.A.C.S., which provides In part:
    "All warrants on the county treasurer, except warrants
    for jury service, must be countersignedby the county
    auditor."
    If the county has an auditor, this procedure must be followed.
    Before the county treasurer endorses any warrants, except jury
    warrants, all warrants must be countersignedas required by
    Article 
    1661, supra
    . There Is no conflict between this provision
    of Article 1661 and Article 2554, as amended. The treasurer must
    In all instancesregister warrants as required by Articles 1625
    Honorable Ben J. Dean, Page 4     O-4462
    and 1627# ViA.C.8..  Of &me,   when any warrant is presenteq:,$o
    the county.treasurer,drawn bj the proper authority,beforebeing
    endorsed by the county treasurer there-must be money enough in the
    depository belonging to the fund upon which saMwarrant I@ dx?ati
    out of which the same is payable. If the money ia not available,
    the treasurer must wait until such money is available, before he
    endorses such warrant or warrants for payment as authorized by
    Article 
    259, supra
    .
    “,
    Yours very truly
    .         ATTOWEY QENERAL OF TZXAS       .,    _
    ‘.   _.
    .                     8) Ardeil .Wiillams       -~
    BY
    AW:GO/cge                            Ardell Williams
    Assistant
    APPROVED MARCH 14, 1942
    a/ GROVER SELLERS
    FIRST ASSISTANT
    ATTORNEY GENERAL
    APPROVED OPINION COMMITTZE
    By BWl3,Chairman
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-4462

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1942

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017