Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )


Menu:
  • Qerald C. Mann            AuFrrIN Il.-rrcxAs This Opinion overrules
    w?amx````xxx                                 in part letter opinion
    *-mexDzY"-Am.                             to W.M. Porter dated
    2/12/38.
    Hon. John M. Turner
    County Attorney     Opinion No. O-4424
    Eee county          Re: Penalty on delinquent taxes
    Reevllle, Texas         of Independent school dis-
    trict.
    Dear Sir:
    We have received your letter of recent date in
    which you ask'the opinion of this department upon the fol-
    lowing question:
    "Can an independent school district
    legally charge ten per cent penalty on its
    own delinquent taxes?"
    Article 7336, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes,
    provides In part as follows:
    "If any person fails to pay one-half
    (l/2) of the taxes,;Imposed by law upon him
    or his property, on or before the thirtieth
    day of November of the year for which the
    assessment Is made, then unless he pays all
    of the taxes (Imposed by law on him or his
    property), on or before the thirty-first day
    of the succeeding January, the following
    penalty shall be payable thereon, to-wit:
    During the month of February, one (1%) per
    cent; during the month of March, two (2$) er
    cent; during the month of April, three (3%P
    per cent; during the month of May, four(4$) per
    cent; during the month of June, five (5%) per
    cent; and on and after the first day of July,
    eight (8$) per cent."
    We quote from the opinion of the recent case of
    Love v. Spur Independent School District, et al, 143 S.W.
    (2d) 793:
    "Article 7336, Revised Civil Statutes of
    1925,.provided In effect that a penalty of lC$
    on the entire amount of delinquent taxes should
    accrue~and be collected as penalty.- Thereafter
    in 1934 article 7336 was amended by the Fourth
    Called Session of the party-thlrd~Leglslature, c.
    10,$2, Vernon's Ann. Clv. St.art.'7336, and re-
    duced the penalty on delinquent taxes to 8$, but
    Honorable John M. Turner, Page 2
    the amendment became effective ninety days
    after the date of the adjournment of said
    session November 10, 1934. Article 7336d
    provides that the State or any county or other
    subdivision of the State 'except such cities,
    towns, villages, special school districts and
    independent school districts which do not
    adopt the provisions of this section' shall
    collect penalty on a different basis but this
    last article has no application to the case
    under consideration for the reason the record
    falls to show that Its provisions were adopted
    by the City of Spur or the Spur Independent
    School District. Therefore the penalty would
    be calculated according to article 7336 and
    article 7336 as amended by the Forty-third
    Legislature.
    "It will be noted from the delinquent
    tax record of the City heretofore set out that
    It charged lC$ penalty for the years 1928 to
    1938, inclusive, when under the law it should
    have charged only 8$ penalty for the years
    1935 to 1938, inclusive, which would have re-
    duced the penalty due the City by $1.97.
    "The judgment In favor of the City for
    $1.97 penalty in excess of the legal amount
    is a mistake which in our opinion comes under
    the doctrine of de minimis and does not re-
    quire a reversal or modification of.the
    judgment. Texas & N.O.R.Co. v..Stumberg, Tex.
    -Civ.App., 115 S;W.(2d) 1~26; Lewis v. Lewis,
    Tex.Clv.App.. 
    125 S.W.2d 375
    ; Wichita Falls
    & Oklahoma Ry. Co. et al v. Pepper, Tex.CiV.
    APP., 
    101 S.W.2d 365
    . .We also note that in
    1930 the Spur Independent School District
    charged a penalty of but $2.40 on delinquent
    taxes of $48. This was to the defendant's
    advantage In the sum of $2.40.
    "An examination of the schedule of the
    delinquent tax record of the Spur Independent
    School District heretofore set out discloses
    that the School District charged lO$ penalty.
    up to and including 1933 but only 8% penalty
    thereafter and the defendant is entitled to no
    deduction therefrom."
    You are respectfully advised that the penalty
    should be calculated according to Article 7336 before and
    .   .
    Hondrable John M. Turner, Page 3
    after its amendment. In other words, for the years prior
    to the amendment a penalty of lO$ is authorized. For the
    years after the amendment a penalty on a graduated scale
    Is authorized from February to July following the date of
    delinquency, and a penalty of 8$ after the first day of
    July. The letter opinion to which you refer in your letter
    of request was one written February 12, 1938, to Honorable
    W. M. Porter. The author of the opinion cited Article 7336,
    as amended, providing for an 8$ penalty. He closed the
    opinion w1th.a statement that the district could charge a
    lO$ penalty. We believe that the author Inadvertently wrote
    lC$ when he meant 8$. This statement is expressly overruled.
    Yours very truly
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    By     George W. Sparks
    Assistant
    OWS:IM:bt
    Approved March 4, 1942
    Grover Sellers
    First.Assistant
    Attorney General
    Approved Opinion Committee
    By BWB, Chairman
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-4424

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1942

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017