Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )


Menu:
  •               TBEATJTORNEYGENERAL
    OFTEXAS
    XoaorebloArnold IF. ~mnklla
    county Attarnb~
    Your letter of
    loa rrcm this  department
    mt0r   $6 @(Ir0u0w88
    rZ not,doesthe oount hmoarl     tto
    8pytn   bxobmtor tuelm t;
    atr ritor&ul.
    P                                             _*
    “If not, how f~ the oouty to 1.``# ralld ,, i,
    tax lwy?
    P JO
    rppr~oi8tb y o uQuzultr
    r            k
    hu iab1.n
    #l8Oo a p a a y -
    lng the reqtmrt with 8 well-prepsM4 mumuy of tha pertl-
    nbnt Coaatltatloa, statutbti *a4 au8b,0riU08r
    In oam of (ttromoy in t&m Qouut   ~amlmleaom*
    Court, the Cbunty tuQ@ ia outhor%sOd tQ maI;,8a lvpolatmat
    to ii11 mob memoy.       Rev.   CTlv.f?tato.,Art.   RJU.
    F
    :             The   Oouty   Judge la not authorlxed     to doalan   l
    vacaaay for any O~WO, but. upon rbaiw th8t    then ui6ta
    suoh voaanoy. he ia outhorited to make the appointmat, aa
    provldodIa,the Artio1elaaatobov. e1t.d.
    Artlok 2356 or the Dsrleed Civil %ntuteo                 deolerwa:
    tex eh811 be latIe4 lxoopt et 8
    Wo aofgity
    regular texm or the oourt,@ml when all ambars
    Of &aid OOtUt a@     ~bSOllt.w            .
    Thla In a valid leglalntiraon&z&t,     and a oo&y tax lev%&
    ltm y tim,   or by anytribunel exoeptate wgularternof
    the oourt, en4 ahen all menbero of se14 oourt era prawi~;lo
    bV6lid.   l'rss1. %xUbarough, ahurlff, 8 :::.%:.@O; Wooaks
    t. State, W fL 1:.(2) 714, (3.2).
    If t&s County r'udgotwiza astortrim .&hatthere.bxists
    tiraaanoy in the Conulssiaoers'Court,hewuuldbemtIroly
    uithh   lnia#o uuE     to mk u
    a niIlBmc l ua  te
    ppoltltocrnt
    thorbto,
    end upon the eppointte’n    loboptlnga3d qwlifylng for auth
    pocltlcm,the soto of the appointee aa ComIaslomr would be '
    ralULd emu thou@ It should aWtrtmrd be det6rnlned jtiiolst
    ly that no vaoancyhad In truth existed. In other uords, tlm
    new eppointao wwld at load be a di Sacto orfioer,uboee of-
    fIoIa1sots would be telld, 'Xxport8 Wyeo,  I& I?. r;, 831;
    bbrtlat. GntnrltleuInd. f%hool Met., 266 C-.7;.607, writ
    refus&~ Blowbtt 7. RiohardsonIfid.f?&ool M0t., 240 2. C.
    529; Cole 7. Pofto,        155 s. s.   350..
    In thlr.mamr l&e detbeole of tho impotewg of the
    the emuel levy uould be aotdad.
    county to monlco
    Gf oourse,iit,   swh 6etemInetlon by ths judga,
    and th0 eppolqtmat   end quauri0au0n   0r a suo04mor, no
    rurthar. aaapamation  oould be pe$d to the former oom&naloaar.
    .
    You   ue    torther advleed    that       t&are   16 ni
    authority    Sor the eppointuent       of 8 deputy        acu&soloa-
    lr   by any one in any event.
    Crustfry,    that the. above   fully lmuwa           your in-
    quiriet,wa are
    Very tily your8              ,
    A’PXSWR         G?!WRALOF SX&?
    ‘
    - .
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-4349

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1942

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017