Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )


Menu:
  •             TEE   A'LTORNJYGENE~RAL
    OFTEXAS
    Honorable 0. P. Lockhart, Chairman
    Board of Insurance Commissioners
    Austin, Texas
    Dear Sir:                Opinion No. O-4373     '.~
    Re: May a stock casualty company Sn-
    corporated and licensed in Texas
    under Ch. 18, Title '78,'invest
    its surplus funds in bonds -issued
    by a road district of a Texas
    county under the provisions of
    Article 4706, Subsection (c)?
    Your letter requesting the opinion of this department
    on the above stated question reads as follows:
    "Please advisewhether a stock casualty
    company, Incorporated and licensed in Texas
    under Chapter 18, Title 78 .mag, under the pro-
    visions of Article 4706 subsection (c) Invest
    its surplus funds'in bonds lssuea by a road
    district of a Texas County.
    "We are of'~theopinion that the question
    should be ansvered In-the negative. -The'com-'
    pany involved argues to the contrary; however,
    upon the contention that road districts are por-
    tlons of counties, and that, therefore, road
    district bonds should be construed to be county
    bonds and as such eligible for investment. We
    have stated our views that the test of eligl-.
    blllty is not that of territorial coincidence,
    but one of Identity vel non of legal entitles.
    It seems to us that a road district is a total-
    ly different legal entity from that of a county
    or countles in which the road district's terri-
    tory may lie, and hence in no proper sense is
    a road district bona a county bond within the
    meaning of the statute cited. Please advise
    if we are correct in this view."
    Article 4706, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, pro-
    vides in part:
    Honorable 0. P. Lockhart, page 2        O-4373
    "No company, except any-.writingLife,
    Health, and Accident Insurance, organized
    under the provlslons of this Chapter shall
    invest its funds over and above its paid-up
    capital stock In any other manner than as
    follows:
    . . . .
    "(c) In bonds or other Interest-bearing
    evidence of indebtedness of any county, In-
    corporated city, town, or school or sanitary
    or navigation district, such navigation dis-
    trict to contain a population of not les.sthan
    three hundred and fifty-nine thousand (359,000)
    according to the last preceding Federal Census,
    in this or any other State in which said com-
    pany may be duly licensed to conduct an lnsur-
    ante business, if such evidences of indebted-
    ness are issued by authority of law and if
    interest upon them has never been defaulted.
    Article 752a, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, author-
    izes any county or any political subdivision of a county, or
    any road district that has been or may hereafter be created by
    any general or special law to Issue bonds forthe purpose of
    construction, maintenance and operation of macadamlzed, gravel
    or paved roads and turnpikes, or Ln aFa thereof, in any amount
    not to exceed one-fourth of the assessed valuation of the real
    property of such county or political subdivision or road dis'
    trlct, and to levy and collect ad valorem taxes to pay the In-
    terest on such bonds'and provide a sinking fund for the redemp-
    tion thereof. Said statute specifically provides that:
    11
    . . . . The term 'political subdivision'
    as used in this Act, shall be construed to mean
    any commlssloners~precinct or any justice pre-
    cinct of a count%, now or hereafter to be created
    and established.
    Article 778a, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes,-author-
    izes any number of adjoining counties within this State, par-
    suant to authority conferred to Section 52 of Article 3 of the
    Constitution, to issue bonds not exceeding one-fourth of the
    assessed valuation of the real property of the territory ln-
    eluded within such counties, and to levy and collect annually
    ad valorem taxes to pay the interest upon such bonds and to
    provide a sinking fund for the redemption thereof, for the same
    Honorable   0. P. Lockhart, page 3        o-4373
    purposes mentioned in Article 752a,~'supra.-When such b'onds
    are issued'by virtue of Article 
    752a, supra
    , when issued for
    and on the faith and credit of political subdivisions or
    road district, such taxes shall be assessed and collected in
    the same manner as is now provided by law for the assessment
    and-collection of common school district taxes. (Article
    752m, Vernon 9 Annotated Civil Statutes)
    With reference to classification of county bonds,'
    Article 752s, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, provides:
    "When the road bonds have been Issued by "
    a county as a whole, such bonds shall be known
    and designated as I           County Road Bonds',
    taking the name of the county issuing the same,
    and shall express on their face that they are
    issued,under authority of Sectlon52, of Artl-
    de 3, of the Constitution of Texas, and laws
    enacted pursuant thereto."
    With reference to classification of subdivision bonds,
    Article 75213provides:
    "If the proposition to issue the road bonds
    of a political subdivision or road district is
    adopted, such bonds shall express on their'face:
    The State of Texas, the'name of the ctinty, the
    number or corporate name of,the subdivision or
    district issuing such bonds, and they shall be
    designated as 'Road Bonds', and express on their
    face that they are issued under authority of
    Section 52, of Article 3, of the Constitution
    of Texas, and laws enacted pursuant thereto."
    In view of the foregoing statutes with reference to ``.
    classificatlon.of bonds, the procedure to be followed in ls-
    suing the same, etc., it is clear to us ~thata road district
    is a totally different legal entity from that of a c'ountyor
    counties in which the road district'sterritory may lie and'~
    hence in no proper sense is a road.distr'ictbond a county bond
    within the meaning of Article 
    4706, supra
    . Therefore, we
    respectfuIly answer the above stated question in the negative.
    It will be noted that the Legislature, in subsection
    (c) of Article 
    4706, supra
    , specifically designated school or
    sanitary or navigation district but did not name or mention
    road districts. We believe that it was the intention of the
    Legislature to-exclude road district bonds from subsection (c)
    of Article 4706, and did exclude such bonds by not naming them
    therein.
    Honorable 0. P. Lockhart, page 4              o-4373
    .
    .
    Artlcle‘779;Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes; as
    amended Acts.1941, 47th Leg;, p. 899, ch,.552;sec: 1, the
    Commissioners4 Court'may invest sinking funds accumulated for
    the redemption and payment of any bonds issued by such county,
    political subaivlslon, road district or defined district there-
    of, in bonds of the United States, of Texas, or of any county
    in this State, or any school district or road district of
    this State, or any incorporated city or townof this State;
    or in bonds oPthe Federal'Farm Loan Bank System, or'in War
    Savings Certificates, and certificates of indebtedness lssu-
    ed by the Secretary of the Treasurer of the United States.
    No such bonds shall be purchased which, according to their
    terms, mature at a date subsequent to the'time of maturity
    of the bonds for the payment of which such sinking fund was
    created.
    To us, the above mentioned statute illustrates that
    the Legislature does not consider road district bonds as county
    bonds, in the sense that county bonds are ordinarily under-
    stood and treated by law. But, road district bonds and county
    bonds generally are considered and treated as two distinct and
    separate types of bonds.
    Yours very truly
    ATTORNEYGENERAL     OF TEXAS
    _.
    By s/Arde11.Williiiims
    Ardell``Williams
    Assistant
    AW:GO:wc
    APPROVED FES 5, 1942
    s/Grover Sellers
    FIRST ASSISTANT
    ATTORREYGRWRRAL
    Approved Opinion Committee By s/MS       Chairman
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-4373

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1942

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017