Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )

i .... ,:-~
401
il . i
:: -..,:..*
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
‘Ditatione bf puImoc4tion ln euite for the ool-
lectlon of dellaquont texoe hevo heretofor been
o~OP3Mdw th4 Dl'OViSiWJ Of GeLtttOn 3 Of Artlale
If345b, Vomon’e Aaxoteted Civil Btatutee. A otmpnri-
eon of the lset m0nt1Qxeanrtlale with th6 provfslone
OS ibtso1a 42, aiwaa will dlecloee a~oroue tioon-
elrtcncLde zi tha requiremexto of the tvo statutes,
both as to the aoat.Qnto ef tha citation by publloatfoa
and the numberof times vhlah such oltation is w-
fpe8a fb b0 p\iblmfa It vi11 0160 be noted thet
UXdOr thC~DrOVi8iOIlS Of &WC&b Biu 193, fi6OtiOZl1, itl
uuendln,q Article 298, it la provided t&&t eikrtiona
by xmbl:catlon Under erly ~onolul or lpea2ol l&w e&u
be publIahed as mguirod by euch @?mrel or apaolal
lav. In the 1rE;at or th4 aonfllotlng Dl’OViSiOW OS
ma00 El11 193 ltaelf and th8 furtbnr oonSlS.otebetveen
euctbbill and Seatlox 3 .of ArtLolLs 7345b. tlv# SoUovSq
questlone nm eulee&ttad,
“(4) Arc the cointents al 4 oi?&Nn by gubltoa-
tiap in 8 Uolsaqucnt; t&x sult.$or state QawsOov&~ taxaa
raqulrad to aoataln the prov1elonecmnn8rotad
ln Ada10
7311ifjb.or the ~rooleioaae ;fn Artlala 792, or both?
'(5) uhlch of the ltstutae reserrod to & qReet1en
5 gor4m numbor es publhaatfon*
t&e vbloh tit be ueda
of such citation by @?licrtioti
'Cltetloae by yublicur-tl6n uader Artiolo 73&b
ordlnmily acmtrrinappxcimstel~ 3000uorde, whomaeI l
a ita tlo xby publ2cation uhich.conforne ta the x%aqulmr-
went8 OS both .Artiale,75Wb md Article, 7342 vi11
crdinitrll~ contalrr ap3woHxmtaly 590 wordaL aad the .
fea for publlehlng quoh oltatlox at tha ato. pxwided ’
by ArtiaW 1342 vmld tlmxrai"crpe W,tzppx%mtPurto~$20.00``
,Jx~ inBtancUS,hbafrW3f, V``~COIUS~IW``````
.te bYOlVed in 0 e~%o'eu%t~-the cltstlax will bo ,flg
leager end the goetr mmQootf?A-w hlgbtPr. ,.,~
“illll yuui thexvfom, Wnaqad*illii4.upnathi :
follav~ quwtioa1 I
.“(6) 1s ootiitor``auth6r~e4dto
my th 444te 4S ,* uitatfaa. bj,pubmutfa¶~la~
:
obe48 vhero~the deUnquent texoe leeseeed egblnet
the propertj do not equal or uxc44d the publieber~e
fee ae ret out in ~tlola TN?”
We find it de8lrbbls in WUV6bl.ttgJOW qU8St1OlkIIto Slret
``tsnitlnttthe rtatw and eSSoat OS Articrlo 7302 OS Vernon*e Civil
~tetutoe OS Toxae, ati emmdod, end purportedly rcr-onuoted In House
B~U. 193, Aote 47th Legislature, Reguler ~eelon. To do thle 94
nut lnqulre into the statue of said statute prior to the tlm4 It
yea 444ndod by eoid Xm184 Dill 193.
Artlalo 7342 vee first emoted in 1897. Said statute
provided Sor ILmthod OS ieeting cltatlone vbere the ounoce of prop-
ertf are unknovn or ore non-reolden.te of the atoter the fern there-
of, the nsxuberof time euch ClMtlqn ws,e to be publlahod, lf pub-
llehsd ln a nevepapor, proYided Sor publloetlon in l nevepaper of
an edjolrrkgoountj vhm no aoveppor we publfrJwd lp the aotmtr ’ :
Yboðe au18 VSBpandintr, provided a method Of peting aotloer 1S
tho publlcatlon oould xot be had in a xevepwer,, proeorlbed a ml-
mumfee to be ahwg4d Sor publleh%ng such oltatlom, preeorlbed
csrteln pmper reuftals in tha getltian tn au021 aeeurl prmfdud that
nuch wits, attar such publlaatlon, ehould be prcceeded vlth as ia
othur cases and that the etbto RUCI county -11 have judgment for
tbu amount of b.~ee due and havs a deome ordorltq euah property to
bu sold as Zn ordlnery tkm eulte vbera tie ovner he8 been pe~onally
sewed vith prooese eaadprovided SW credlta as ehovn W tba M-
celpt ef the property tnmac or tee othoawiee e?Ldsaoed by poeitlvo “,
proor *harIng the payment of th4 t4mu mad ror.
the pmvleione
tlndsr of said Artiolo 7342, prior to its
eaendment by Xcuee Bill 19.95, it vee olearly the lay thet to bv4 l
o ftb tio ni8eueSor 5tnk nc vnh e b tt”88 o vxer eo f p r o p er tyIn a tu
Milt, it vae neoeoeer) to leeus the mme made* ths pro*lsic4ne of
Art1014 2040, R C. 9, of 28x48, 1925. We quote Srom sht4 ve*
BagbyrneEetata {Civr Appp.) 126.8. Ii. 68?, ‘aa Soollowet
“Heirs of a doceaeodperson vhoeo mnlment OS
title l* 0S reoord 8x9 not unkmnm ovmre of ma1
estate, but am know ovnere, even thou& the nemoe
OS euah ovzmm am Mau?vn. Tbmdorer th4 proYlelone
of Article 7342, eupra, em snot applLcable in obtain-
ine leeuenco aad eitnl@o of noti by publiaatioa upon
unknovn httl~ 88 ovneru of ;PMparty ia tax eulte,
Willianae Yer Young, 41 Fexi Cl*. App. Pl2, 90 8* If. 940,
rrltnfolud;8tatoJlor
2mx*ca* A&m 31 a* WI
,
‘. /
there olteh; Undervood vme Blgpao, To%. Ccm. Am,
32 s. it. (26) 1102.a
ms pocullar aonditlon OS the lav resulted even aStar the or&g-
inal enactmnt of &tlclo 7345~br Vornon~n Civil statutes or
TUBS, b&w Sunato Dill 477, Aats 45th Leglalaturo, Re@.ar Sos-
@ion, page 1494-a. ThLs is shorn froza a f’urther quotation fra
state vse Bagbr’s Estate, aupr~) vhioh says:
*Ifelthsr Artlole 7342, not m&b, oupra, pro-
vidos la expreos la@A.qo for the Y.osuanc* Of servlo*
of notice br publication upon unknoun heirs who may
be the owners of realty ln tax sulta. Theme 18 no
other statute under ChaptsF 10, supraF that taxpressl~
provides f’oor,tba lssuanaa s&d servloo of altetlon or
of notice of publlaatioa upon unlumn heln as ovmrs
of rlmlty.’
The Forty-fifth Zealalnturo, Regular SemIon, maated
Ssnsta Bill 477 (uhlch is shoun as ArtLals 7345-b, FLmmaxfs Clvll
$tstut.es of Texar) ublczh 18 a comprohe~slva ‘aot and appareatly
latemled to be a rather coapletoand vorkablv sot on the pToaedtuw
to be folloued in tax suita brought ioa’ the collsctlon of klla-
quent taxes by the various taxing wilta. Section 3, deal- with
prooess, of raid Senate EM1 477 vss amendedby said lEnme Bill’
565, Acts 46th Ugls3ature, 3939, flegular Eooaslon. FIVXS the
blstoxy of the amendatory act, and the date of th.%.Byg ``lsioa,
lt vns evidently calculated to meet the hold
Bs@y~s Estate, supra, and mlthor UtLale 7.
?s ‘2 rioz 7344-b’pro-
vi&d for altatlrm to isew in tax suite to’unknown heirs vho
mi@d be owners of ~o~arty, The tunen~at mlarp?d tba scope
of Seotlon 3 so ae ? o lnolude the “uaknova holrs” vho tight be
the ovaers of realty aad subjaot to a delinquent tsx cuit tJms
rho8iqthe lateatloa of the Lu&lslatwe to make Artlal~O 7345-ba0
~8arZyaapJ lot8 aa Act aitposslbPe. The pertinent provlsloas oft
#aid Artic; PCJ7$%Sj-b, insofar ae the soap0 of this opinion lm ow
,osrned, are Seotloas 3, 4, .6, 0, 9 and 23, tilah vi11 not ba
sopie herda for the s&e or brevity.
Fraa h aareful aoaefdaratloa 0S the provlst?ns of
Artiole 73V+b, oupm, it beoasaus rnppareat on its faae that it
aubodies the sorao subjeat matters and haa the smie obJeat and ,_
rawpose as that of Artlal* 7342, etapa, ~rlor to Its amoacbseat
Rouse Billli93,mpr& Ue thl& &hmo tr mo doubt but vhat
zs irprorkionru*ina~atudtht~.~tkn~
Oll@4.
The Le&Irlatlve lnteat uith refrrsnoo to ~hethor a
flpal 18 oxprsus or lr&Iad is crlv~yr aontralllnm Texas p*l-
@ysrs' Insumaoo Aosoqat~og ~6~ Morgan, Cus. App. 295 9. W. 588.
us think it can be said'that the Le~lslativa intention to express-
1~ reqwal unr exist%&3 lav, Iwiludin$j Artlolla 7342, sapra, that
&ht be +i aonfllat vlth the provtsloas of sold Artlals 7345-b,
nwra, is plainly nnn2fost by the terms of Zlbation 13 thonof.
~msvsr, IS such Act did not expr~5517 mpeti ArtIole 7342, sups,
-a It la our opiaion that said Artlale 7345-b. supra, repealed
w lmplIsntlon tho pro~l.sIons of said Art1010 7342 prior to its
.~&ment by the 47th Lsglslaturrrr Tha appllaable rule mttpportbd
~numeroun authorltIe5, is ateted %a 39 Tex, Jur. p4 l&S wbsra
it ir saLQt
" l l l l&em two statutes am in pari materla
and it Is impoeslbls to recoaolle thm, tho older
statute vlll be held to be repealed by impllmtion '.
to the extent of the 4mUllot. fa lwh olrowastsaacos
it ir, ~&?05UWlbd
that. th# I#f$DhtW tnt’Stld& to XV-
pal all laws OP parts of bws olaarly inconrtstent
vlth its lrt*r, (Lat.
q'hls Qapwtematcoaaldursd thoprcwlcleas ofsaldArtlal0
792 and the prorloiona or Istiale 7345-b, prtor to the ameahaal’ “’
of 8eotloa 3 thereor by Hwse Bill y&, mlpra, had la 'Tipa@- NO* - '-,.;i
ogyii? thll ‘IIlpartIecat ram '~
*It is clwb* fxois the &aorltie8 eitcd above
that the provisl6as of Arbielo 7345-b, 45 qr will
prevalZ over the provlsimrr ,of.Artlale 73 2# SW=,
should they be la aWf‘llot.*
We cleslre to observe aauther nil8 of lav tiah vs t&lnk
is applicable to tha matter ve are dlscuss~. Wo quote trap #IHL
vs* Uhseler county, 125 8. U. (2d) 3pl (aff%zswd 144 Se YI @A)
8@), uhors t&o coupt saldt
'%n the aase of ~ryaa vs. fhmtlberg,5 TSIX~
418;
&?Jh, the mpreatu Court sf this M.&B tmnam00d the
rule whtah, we think, is deeisiw of' tho lt~aue;``fOn
ue. such rule Is tn the mzmrlng laiqwget
undoubtedly ia time thatraomtx*roClon~whiahrspsals-
foraar statutes, by impl.twttca, Is rUrt to Im PnVOrodt
aad it 18 alro true thst statutea in pqi materis,
aad relating to ths ssw 8ub sot, are to be tekua and
oMstrued tog8kherJ - 1 rlstabekPlwbtbat
.
I.
.:!
,
:
,:
:
-
A aoasidsretlon of ths sbwe faots and authorities
b&q us to the iasvitablo oonoluslon that tho Logislatum &id
sot hen authorlt~ ta ana@ Artlola 7%?, as it attenpted to da
w the n-amatnent of it la said Iiouss Bill 193,.supra, for
me Iwason that th6 8tahltQ had r1ready :besn repcaled elthor or-
pwrrly oc by liapll~tlc%t br th4 enaotmnt of said Artisle 73454,
mm* .
Did the 47th Legislature Lntead to -ot said Article
M2, a8 an irsdO~IK?Ont onb IMiU (ItatutO, w in its clmnged fom,
its 8OtlRn in p-Sing Bill 1937 Var suoh strrtuto w-enaoteb
IbUse ~.
into l valid lnvt Ve think t&t both of those quostlons must k
mrwred in the ne&lw and will dlsauss awe of the reasons for ~
our oonoluslons.
Roueo Btll 193, sopro, vhm it8 aaptlon, body and enor-
esncy elauuo arc amsldomd to;Zethor, was clearly lntanded ta m- “. \
qulre,ln most, ii not a11 lfLstculcos , that the kf.nds of publication8 ; /
dsrlnsd and eunmunrtcd themin, should be rwulped to be published
la acme novspaperr vhloh tom vos also deflnod, descrlb:zi~ the
mu&w of timqs suoh publioetion should bo nm Yn the absonao or .:-5 ’
rrlstlng rtntutox7 amendrJ8nts and ?lxZng a max&u5s logs1 rak to :
bs chargod fop ruoh publfoatlons ahd t&a the aat procseds to
acalld 8Qzb r 6vsp eo iflc
no t
tic e .tatutos
a ndp r o c Qs8 to aonfom, lt
-St, t0 thS Iuy lS& X'Ste f'lxed w HOtWO Dill 193. ti8Oiu U ~_ .. ;
Art&l. 7342 i8 eanoemsd, th# 08ption of sold Act pZ'QT%&8t ~_ ~.i
Mettan of mid Bows Bill 193 and it8 ~rs~%sx`` pl'Od8ior
prior to rscoprigg Artlalo 7342, in It8 erpsndbd Sam, sa)rt
'Ax'tiola 7342 of Chapter 10, Title I.22 oi' the
Revised Civil Statutes OS 93x8s of 192Elr 8-1 be and
the Sarpe is .&w&y Smen&od ao 8n to CndOm vlth th8
Othhr ~l’O%‘lSiOOS d-f%18 AOt m ZWfXlclOtin`` tW W&W
18 OnrOndiod4b8 fOf1OW81" (%dOl'SOOPbXQ OUrO)
mt the 8tBtUtdU WCQto thewaiUU', a8 amnded, ntxd 6s thef
Ta~ raoopZed?&the Aat mid that the Le~lslature dld not lntozul
! @pnos cm crl&rl& nev, sopmate and Indopondent statute
1 Art1010 7342) by itb aetlon ln pasaLaGn[ouoe Bill 193. Art1010
t
7j42, 08 found bl flouoe gill 193, 1s not s%mplf a statute relating
tc the publiaetlon of citatlono snd EettfnG 6 mtar to bo Ch.!ir&Sd
F lo such ~88~s~ St ~008 farthor and dusorlbo8 certain s&``lflc
statutory procedure.to be follovod ln tax suits thenselves casing
vz;go:t8 prtioulaF pr0~181m and lays down certsln rightsaad
. !Ebuo it is clear that the body of tho statute go80 mu&
farth8r th8n the r6al object evtdaatly Sought to be attained br
ths Ls~lslatum, b 6ttomptln% to ammd tho statute, vhlch MS to
pmld6 Sor 0 la%aI rate to b aharwd by nsvagopera ror ronlr;lng
8 puh~iChtiOll Of GitatiOtt th6FOirr provldod for 60 that the mte
wuld bati confommity vlth tba ~mv1sIona of' Utfolo 2$4 and ma, : \
81 emnded by the Act. The Lvglal8tl?o lnt6ntlon to olllr ChLmp
aald Art1aY.e 7342, atpro,w etmdaent,SO that it would ~onfoxn !
to said ArtbCh8 29 and i!go, @cl ar;rondQd by XIowe Bill 193. Is
stmn@c&od by tho fast that the sontance in said statute, relnt-
lng to a&Br@bs aad the mnnb4m of t&m8 the aitation thornin pro-
M6d foF 18 to b0 yubliahad, Ls the OnXy rantqzoo of tha orf@.ul
P rtrtutethat wes ewod+ Ti3m-oVW) hmsWF, a new sentunae
r&led pwzld%zq fog peyDent by the Comptroller and Colleotor to
ths now~por publlahftq8Uoh citation ~OFthe bEi% rate for ask- :
lne’ such gubllcotlon, wblah i8,oontrsrp to the existing method of
``UZlt,*8 iShoniaaiteF.8bottnitl th%80@3fOh %X3 Otherat&-
UtOS, S~CifiOlbll~ SC@& t0 be dtS#Zidfbdw ~QWS Bill 193, 8h.W
thatth6onl~tihangenmdsby thalraapndra~t UeStot&5Q36OXM
%-ate ahargeabls by nevspapelrs for
for io each of said ststutos so
vitbthe Is&al ml& lr tnb lla llo
. ..#
d
in uid Bansa Bill 193e ,
Them %StkOMOFUfUtldUWYhCI.SUbSOf 8ktUtO~OOXi8tFU8-
la t!!tAxatexprelrssd la PopasuS VT, P~ttormn, (8, Ct.) 51 b* Y.
w) 680, vlwre it la ram
“sn detomltlltqg the Le&ulailw Intent, tbm wmrt
should aot look nlcmu to sry am phraao, olauser OF
8antenae 0r the eat, hut tha entiw fwtt and twu ltb-
01UdO8thbW+Ctl thO’krdjlOfth@~tUXt th#
M a g q uy a a ta 8. 4 l *l.,
:- _~
FromA aonnbleratfonOSthe vor4lngof the aaptlou of
uti'%ouse Bill 195, the prov%sions of the aot 1trslS ¶.naluding
it8 objoat and purparo, tosetbm vlth the emergemy aifnsm, vo
Rm ccunpolled to 8a that #Snae Artlale m2 va8 repealed, either
,xgresrly or by Artlale 73&b, eupmol there wae
nc valid and exlstlng rtatute o aupport an t?m?nch;lant
thereof,
l8 v~8 ett8mptcr4 in SootIon 5 of oai4 IW48e Bill 193, and further,
tbbt #ai4 IJt8tUtO VA8 IlOt 2'Q-bn8Ot48& by 881d Ad, B8 A #WV Ald
I;rb;pntleat IltAtuto and that it hA8 no 5moo and bffeat.
Tha QYidQnt lOgislAtit@ pllZ9080 Ad ~tO!lti~, w OnirOb
w xaure Birl 19Sr auprzs, vhiah vc have already 4lsausae4, is not
thvarted nor afloatad by our ~eamnlng and hol4lng. In Seotlon 2
of uld Rouse Bill 193 relutiag to Artiale 29, wo fin4 this pm-
twona :.,'\,,
%fltiwut lntwl~ to exclude any other publioa-
tion to which this eet apglfos, It lsqmalally pro-
rid*4 that th1B A@t 8h511 Apply t0 All O.it~tiO~ OF
notioen vhich ma requiwd to ba publlskxi OF amp be
publr . u fn a lmwmt 1; ZC at t1 f-
8410 ?wal &ate un&m%%t``~ ox&?or"%~
Or OthQP U&&Al 8AlO ~Z?OV~df+d fOF in b'tiOhA &8,
4203, 72=/i And 342 Of the ROYlAd Civti StAtutea of'
TQXAA,1925.' ouru)
"La every o1ee vhbro l.he remlo~ of u.ny oltatlon
or notice in any cam. oontraversyc buit, or praooed-
.. ’ lnglnenyot’theaourt8~f thostatolsrecpWedto
b!z!by publicatiaa rmder.tho prov18lon8 of fuw@noral
or ipeoical lAV of thim state, Ouch ~blloAtiOn UhAU
be published am rspuiawd by the goner01 or rpsoial law
pr~?idlng iOr r~uh nOtlaO by pUbllaAtf~r~
In the oa80 of W&e VO* Bagb;y'r IMato, eupm, ulir
ml. IR exprenBQ4;
*ThepwriBlonB Of OhA tar 10, TltlQ 122 tara-
tlon) of Jt, 0, 9, w2mn app E iaable v%ll oontm I. the
proaodureQmt1on in tax ioreolotuaw Buttr hePa
proroatQ4. 40 TWr J&h p* gal YouugVB. JaabopI*
* I
al0 aa Y. 74, vrlt re~i~edt
Tex, Olv. Apgh 210 Sb W. 219;
1~ :8 therctfare uppmont that the court8 of thle rtaw hove n6woc
oonriaored that Artlalbn 28-a, 29 or 29-a of Vcrnon~8 Civil Stat-
,&@a,priorto their-@d!iont w ~o~t!e Bill 193,auT)m,Vet-@ 8p
pllcable t0 plWOsectirq:o in t&x malta. Ttit being the etatua of
th BV, it fOllOW8, thAt raid Artlalea 2&a, 29 and 29-A, of
``mon,r Civfi Statutes, prior to their mondmnt by 8ai4 House
Bin 193,h?i4 tlOVOF bOOll FApOAh4 w impliaLIt;On by t-ha, ACtiOn Of
thr LOgl8lahWO in OmCtlIIf3 Artials 7345-b, Supra, in 1937, an4
88pooisll~ ln *ieV Of the prorlelons of 30atlon 13 of said rtatute,
$lld Articles 28-A, 29 aa 29-6, oupra, wwe, then, propar 8UbjOOt#
of m ancndeto~ Aot vhere anondod in said Bows Bill 193. 0~
their iamendmont ia slid BOWJOBill 193, w think It 1s Ovidant
frownthe lan``s~:s uocd ln that aat that the Leglalatura intended
for the raid uxnenddd statutes to apply, inoofar an applloable, to
th8 rate to be Ohar&edby aewr~para for tmk%n~ pubUutlon8 of
Aotioe8 =a oltatlon8 requlro4 in tax wLta. A dlffaxent legal
tato for w ublications Of Oit8tiOna in tax suitr 1s OXpI’@8S-.
04 in Articl. 73 t 5-b than the rate aUou84 to be chapged in SAid
Artlols’ 29, a# amended by .Hause Bill 193. The provielono with
cfemioe to tho le- 1 rats chargeable for the publloatlon of
,it.atlom la tax LIU ift8 are in oorafllat en4 winnot be recoaofled~
8lnce Ho1180Bill 193, e.mnd~ eaid Art1al.e 29 lr the latost ox-
prosrlbn on the 00~4 rub eot b;r the Legislature, ve thlak It re-
pealed by impllcatlon Ar lo10 ``!Yi-b l~ofar ao the loyal. r&o
oharSoable by aewspApo*e for making altatlons by publloatloa 18
oonatwnsd. 39 TOX. Jar. 145. For the mm mason vo think that
th8 pFoV++Rl wO+4 ti~&ti@tr @a,_SyPra, mrrker i~_U~tbA``~thAt
th. 8~uili.a pX’OViR%OtlO Of fU’tiO30 flQfib, UUpFApB, 8~00`` tho
mnmr of tlmecr the notices or awatloaa therein provtied for #ball
k published, are mntrollitq’wtd trfiould be follov6d~
sin00 VP havo arrived At the aoaalusioa~ sx;rrA88od AbOW
it lr uaneuerrary to anmmr the fW8t t&w rutmltted
que8tions
by you lu your ZvJqtloat.
For tho rea8om heretaabove expros8bd, you are advlred,
in Amwf to your fourth quo~tlgm, 3hAt t?M provlrlonB of Artlao
rhould bo followeda
7J’Q-b
Xa answer to your fWth q.uention we have almmly raid
that theprorillonr of Art1030 734!j-b
Are oo&rolling OVar Artiak
?342rithreforeaoe ta themmrbetofpublioptienr tobond@ of
olktloasw pubUerti6nin mid tax mltr.~
xa exmverto your iixth questionVThwo a&eady, ia
UJ~opinion, huld thatArticle7342hov hae a0 forcro mu effeat
&#a 1ov. fn additlodto what vu have said, ve think that thmra
i,m&hor pmma vhf the rpeaif;a movLlon la raid Artlole
lm it wiseattemptedto br mudded by Eaurr Bill 150,aah
“IT the 8tat. bids th. 18nd In 8% aala,the
c0mptrollor shallallovthl oollootor the amountof
suoh publiaher'a fee to br paici by the OoUootoP to
the publisherr. * l 0,”
fr not a validprovision of then
lnv. XC haa zdrendybeen shovn
fm an exnnlnntlon OS tIm aa~tiion
puotodabove, that Lt limita.
w mopa af the bill aad authorl~eo an ntJomkmnt of aaidArtiolo
792 only3m.h rerpeotto the la&P1rateof publioatlon a0 as to
eonform with Artiolea 29 and 29a as ammdeb he~aln.* Tha eaptlon,
tlunfore, will not rupport the sontaace, just quoted, from aald
7342. We quote frmr 59 Toa Jur. pa 103, a6 follows
lilltlole
“A tltla that rpsoif%er the partloular &Id
all a8wllcw!a8 ir to OOYOP or rtaturr a pwpore to
arm 8 oertata ohage in the pa&or lav, mid Irhra810
not merely daoriptive of the mattera to vhlch the
lav relates, lbws the lurumaatorp oat to thfawc%ng
of the ahfiagacleslgmted 8ad preoludea
yy l
M+on&~
ooatmry OP diffomant meadmeat. l l l