Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )

ff 1% now pq?oeed that this suknmtlcm be amandedto rcrsb e0 folltm0t "b. The uuoti~ sh4311 thet 0hal.lba selary to the ti-6n1% tihaBxeautlreWfXear by tion by appointmentby tk+ stat% Rollxd&¶r VocntfonalEduastlea' .. . . ehouldbe made by the %a&& state Bo%rd for Fmmtlanal Muu%tian, thsn and in that.event, wUd ouoh 3l%ml%l al%utlonof the uTat% YllpurlntenuWLt of s'ublirr ~nratru%tlmau- ~tcmtlc%l2~m%k%h#% tb% ICx%autive Offlew of Said Beard?or ?kmombla ?hn G. Cm& i~we 4 fuada when euahtravel ie neoeseeryin tha adminiutmtleziof the tooattoatil. magram, end is a~pawd by the State Board for Voa6tltn361 XduostloXi.F&d- reted equally atmug tb eovorel -%erv- lees; nnnely agrlcuiturc, hcmcmnkinl;, ~txadtwand lndustriee,on& disttIbu- tiva sduarition. * %mrth - (A) I?6daaireyour opinion80 to mhrst;her or net under th, broth-?kqhes tiot,Wcmp- Deen .Qtorthe @arm %sadkat, orasy Fedeml VocationalRehabilitation Abt, the Boanl Por Vo- datioti Edu)%tionpen use euchmoney sllott6d to ths State at Tsr;eS by the Fedeti ao*em%aent fkomthc~wi Dsen Randa topaythle~8alaryto s\tahExaouUveOff5.&ixParid *(B) ;CoriZdeuahrrplarpbe pcrmittsdurulsr the aoaetitutiaaand Lswa at the stuk ox stwrr, lnamuohaeths aaiddireetorfo 6lsotheState S~rlqteadent tar ~ublLe Inatruatloarw tha State or T6.xasl aid “(0) Roraover, tb ExeautiooDl- sh@d re&tarba all~lrti’a salary aa awhoM oanlt. be 9romteU txpmllpamong the 6avwal ocrvloed3, thetis agrioultum hcmeumkine,tradesaniX indu8tr~esand dlatx&tive eduaaticm,as a?d deflmd tinder any Fedarel Voea- entaatwuted tioneland R8hab.UitatSon AaW and ::.: tim mcunt of rfxnay that The Plan0 prepared by tha oovtrel etutrs are cub- mittt?dto the Offioc at 3luontIonof the ttepzrtaent of the Saterlarfor ap~pravel.If thay are appcmbd, than the Wl%e of ~duaatlondilVt6t6 that the mmb$'8 epportiond! to the v0rLausstatesbs gala. 20 U.S.C.B.~ % 18; Wtatmatmt af ~OU&H#," 1027 ?3attlQrl, pslbems, x?L Them3ia nmdll$ to lmlicatethat thlaFlaa6may mt be MIaslUad, and WB hclisve thet they ray be. %e da not #lx&k thut t?&norah%xQw3murat be approvedby the Fedem.lMiioa af tiu4atIaa but we)do bel.Ims that ehengtmwith regard to tha sslaedan of the F&eoutl.ve orrIosr%ad tha p%y&wlt to him with Ftaeralfunas of a cralmyam not s&nor a&s&es. Suah nattarn rro d.iraet- 11 wbfUm&ed rri~th the adalrd~ratlea or thsrvOOatl@%l Ode- oationprourtun and th$ oxpandltaretri,Pedm8l funds,end ~uteua;;gurepialaabe apprav~ by tha FederelMfios of Z.nthe~%~S unUarooariUanttltm, the Skate %u,jw&uts;dsnt muld atl.U k %sootiv, Of'flimrr but im .raUd bs mah by virtue alpl&Is&~tion (80,stata ;5qmrin- ten&r& Md mf by appohatmmnt BJ the State Bocrrd. Bsada aot b8116va timt this wuld bo a maffIoI6at oheage to re qulra ~l?bdaa-al ap rwu,l. lrut tba afaanige w&h raspsot to the pay&mat of tie salary 18 a tS.imot reversal of pelioy aad werauldrwzirtt such apmw6L "d. T&v ward tdlrectart$0 used to de&g- atee the stats~ofrioiel dirsotl$reapansible tt+the state board ror voaatloaaladueatian, thouqh the xxeotltiveMfiocr twhe ummll~ $84 Bono~ble Ran 0. Gmwl, haee 10 Humble Ban (2.Cneal, page 11 could be oonstmcd to man a r@intmreemSnt to the State of finanaunt repmaaat.1``that pomantaE6 of the 5vhioh the stat+3 otrincr 08 k%outlva Cfflosr &wotes to the vccotloMl edUGrltlon ~tmgm.3h In ether words, if tha otate offia+r dototeo one-fifth of hie tiae tn t&, voti- tiailrlsducctionalp.myrm end ha mcalro!~ a ~5,000 an- z~uslsclarg'frcm the !X;rtats, than $;i,ccc er wm8i r-48 cbUi4 be pat% to the C-tat8 as reinbursemnt. It could 3150 he ooncstruetl ta man a pq-rmnt to 'thdof%mr him- eelf in a%ciitionto h&s aelcry fror5tbc stats. Ai to which cf thhssetwo uo.mtruot&onsis ta bt placed on -m&ibursCYl)O.zt,*~we express no 6~2.don. In this aon- nectlon WC fim beuling tith Fcdewll statutse ondml.- lap upon wblch our intsrpmtation would in no wag be bindin& Af3th% Rp~rcYRl or dl&lpprovrtl of the v. s, Cfliaa at Wuaatioa would indincte its fnterpretatlan upon th salary feature of the acoMment, we belieye thatno *mid expres*aQ 0JIlnlonthamon sn&tht~ part of t&e ruser&``ent ehmld ad muat be feft m&Irely to tbn Fearrml agency. 8% do bold, heuwer, that them is nothing in the Wnetltutlca or statutes of %xamD whicih would prevent 8 2\s ntwlth Faderoilfundatof a ml- to thm ,.mati6 YE t3tipe ttment al l!bMutivo cfriw3rr Fourth tc). Te anamer thir quckatfan in ttw affirmative. Fifth. se &me anwrcsredtIllaqu%etien in the bo@ cf the opinion. X'ewish to e hm~ics that the rulings of the IT.2. vtflacscf .*Auca 3 an ult5mately determLineits uwn condwt under fedeti stat~ed end mgulcrfionsrsleting to toocrtlcml oducaticm. Fox this manon w+ean@snt that ell r?aarn4meata 0~ tPrraats Man be euhmttted to the IL Se Gffiae oi'~dumtlaa. very tmlp yours j&-+?l(>Jgfg~ *glE,,ii&& 62:qyg-&&