Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )


Menu:
  •                                                                      _:   I.:
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY      GENERAL    OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    Qw, Vish and Oyster Conmdssion
    us tin, Texas
    QetAtlemen~              Attentlont   Mr. Vm     J   Tucker
    (\ 1,
    Opi.tionX0. 9+984&A
    4.          \
    Re: Whether +-W&t-,look  plants are
    oold storqe plaws, s de-
    y Artitle 9 , aal
    a
    ve h&we your let                  an opbion   upon   the
    above subjeot matter, as f
    fish wardens
    Z'eoordbooks
    loyse of slwh
    misdemeanor 8nd
    ned in a sum not
    han $800.00 if he
    eoord or refuses to per&t a
    en to inspeat such plant.
    plants are in operation at
    tackers are rented
    riclualsat so much per month
    or per anuum. The lessee is furnished with a
    kq to his locker; the operator of the plant
    may or may not possess a key to the looker.
    *Are these 1OOkQr plants oold storage
    plants 8~ defined by the Artiole cited above
    and would a game and fish warden have author-
    ity to searoh these private lockers without a
    search warrant if he had good reason to believe
    that game animals or game W.rde were stored in
    them?*
    Q81pe,
    Iish and Oyster Com~&eeion - page 2
    I
    Article 809 of the Penal Gode, so far as pertinent,
    r&8
    *It shall be unlawful for any person to
    plaob2in any PbUc aold storage plant, or for
    any operator or employee of any such cold stor-
    age plant to plao,eor aooept for placing in
    suah sold storage plant, any game bird or game
    aniaml of this Gtate at any time sseept during
    the open season prwided for the taking of same
    and for a period of three day8 hmediately
    thereafter.
    sl'heowner or operator of any public oold
    storage plant, which intends to aeospt or &oss
    aooept, any game bird or game animal of this
    State for storage, before aassptlng same shall
    prwide a book in whioh he shall keep a legible
    reosrd Such rsoord shall show the name of each
    l
    and every person plaoing any game bard or game
    ax&ml on storage in suoh pblio cold storage
    plant, the name of the person for whom it is
    plaoed on storage, the number of same, the Id&
    of game bird or game animal plaoed on storage
    8nd the d8te oa rhioh suoh gaussbird or game
    anirpl is plaoed on storage. Mr the purpocre
    of this dot, anj plant in which gams is stored
    for any person, other than the owner of suoh
    plant, Is hereby defined as a pub110 oold stor-
    age plant0 Any public cold storage plant, or
    the reoord book required to be kept in euoh a
    plant, shall be subfect to inspeationby any
    gaaa and fish warden OP this State at any time
    and no warrant shall be required therefor.*
    It Is our opinion that the locker plants described'
    by you are cold storage plants, umlsr this Mtiole, and our
    oenoluslonIs impelled by the following language therein;
    lo +?+ For the purpose of this Ad, any
    plant in Which game is stored for any person,
    other than the owner of such plant, is here-
    by deffned as a public storage plant. + * sa
    Furthermore,we think the plain letter of the
    statute authorizes any gam% an& fish warden to searoh suntch
    private lockers.withouta search warrant, that language being+
    "Any public cold storage plant, or the
    reoord books required to be kept in such a
    plant, shall be subjeot to inspeotionby any
    gams and fish   Mrden   of   this   State   at   any
    time ahd no warrant shall be required there-
    for.9
    Suoh right of search is not in violation of lrtiole
    1, section  9, of the ~onstltution, forbidding unreasonable
    searoh and eeiaure, as evidencedby the following authorities:
    Hew Way Lumber Co. v. Badth, 06 8. V. (2) 292;
    Moore Y. Adams, 91 6. V. (2) 447;
    Blaokburn v. State, 66 8. I. (2) 697i
    InterstateFonarding Co. v. Vineyard, Tax
    Assessor, I9 8. We (2) 4Q3; Same ease,
    3 9. w. (2) 9Wl
    Pence v. State, 899 8. ‘1. g42j
    Battle v. State, 299 8. V. 792j
    ICarrv. Baldwin, 87 Fed. (2) 268.
    of course, such searoh may not be arbitrarilyside
    wttbout the existmoe of reasonable grounds or belief es a
    basi8 therefor. See the foregoing authorities,likewise
    Qhapin t. State, 396 8. W. 1996.
    Trusting that this will be a suffioient answer to
    your inquiries,we are
    very truly     yourm
    ATTbRIIIZTGiBWRAL W           T,2X@
    &;    J&
    BY
    Ooie s(peer
    Assistant
    0S-MR
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-4244

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1942

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017