Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAF. AUSTIN Honorable John S. Baker County Auditor Lnmnr county Paris, Texas Deal-sir: fun8 to taks aare 90, repuestlng an stated quasCion reade aereag* 'enWI&& si0wdue a lkrg0 ~stl%oir'de-' IlnQaent taies* *f w&l& like t6 know if we ualzlegally ep- propriate this money, derlimd irm delinC&ent tax oollwC&z36, it and *en oC&leotieb to the gsneral hid t6 take oaxe of the &made mabe upon tue rwi." FfonorqbleJohn 5. dkor, Page 2 This department has heretoforeruled on a question vry almilar to the question preeented in your inquiry in Opinion No. O-869. We enolose a oopy of said opinion for your fnr0mdf0n. In view or the authoritieeoited in said Opinion Ho. O-869, it is our opinion that pour qUki8tiO!l should be answered ln the negative.and Is so enewered. Trusting that the roregolng rap anewer~ your in- qulry , wo are Yours very truly ATTORNEYUi%ERALO~l'E2%S APPROVED DEC 5,19W m %8ell Wlllianm Urorer Sellers /a/ AStliutaIlt FIRfiTASS1STANT ATTORHISYG-’ APPROVED OPIRION fX#MIl!TRP BY B.V.8 CHA-