Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )


Menu:
  •                                                           650
    OFFICE OF   THE   ATTORNEY     GENERAL   OFTEXAS
    AUSTIN
    Cameron, Texas
    Dear Sir:
    upon taxes or lnuepen-
    noorporated towns ze-
    sa&d aounty tax ool-
    008 of ArtIdles 7S4 and
    ndivldual Is instrumental
    v&se, hti to ala and asslat the loual brrw3re
    in the anforcenant of'the oolleation of till
    delinquent State and Uounty ad valorem taxes,
    penalty and interest, and all delinquent tares
    penalty and interest (eroept taxes of iadepeudsnt
    school districts and Incorporated oities and towns)
    due anr and all politiaal subdivirfo~s or,defined
    dtstricts of said County and State rhieh the
    county tax oolleator reaeives and reoelpts 03s.
    Hon. W. A. Morrison, Rage   #2.
    under the provisions of Articles 7254 and 7257,
    R. S. 1925. ..."
    The contract in question was made between the Commission-
    ers Court of L:ilamCounty and Hon. Emory B. Camp, under
    authority of Articles 7335 and 7335a, Revised Civil Statutes.
    It will be noted that Article 7335 provides only ror the.
    making of suoh contracts for the collection of delinquent
    state and county taxes for a percent on the taxes, penalty
    and interest actually aolleated, and that no provlslon le
    made in that Article for oontraots for the eolleotlon or
    taxes for independent school dlstriots and inaorporated
    towns. On the other hand, provision is made by Article
    7343, Revised Civil Statutes, for the employment oi attor-
    nays to collect delinquent taxes for independent sahool
    districts and cities and.towns. Under that Article it is
    provided that the governing body of a city or town may em-
    ploy some attorney other than the oounty attorney to rile
    su%t for such taxes, and in the same Article It Is provlded
    that the school board of independent school districts shall
    attend to~the empLoyment of attorneys to colleot taxes due
    independent school districts. Thus it appears that the
    Commissioners Court would not .havethe authority to make
    such a contract ior~the collection of delinquent taxes due
    altiea and towns and Independent sohool distriats.
    Forthermore, as shown from the quoted provision above,
    the taxes of independent school districts and incorporated
    alties and towns were specli'ioallyexaepted from the contract
    between Eilam County and Mr. Camp. Our answer to your
    question, therefore, must be in the negative.
    Yours very truly
    ATTCRRJYYGRREUL   OF TE3LAS
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-1155

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017