Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )


Menu:
  •                OFFICE   OF THE   ATTORNEY    GENERAL   OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    Q-C.    MUlW
    A---L
    Eonorable woodrow Curtio
    County Attorney
    Frio county
    Pearsall,  Texas
    Dear Sirr
    Honorable Vioodrow Curtis,      Page 2
    under Article      667,   P. C.,   paragraph 5 .”
    Article      667-5 of the Penal Code reads as follows:
    “Any person desiring a lioenee ae nmnu-
    raoturer,   distributor,    or retail   dealor may
    in taoatlon or in term time iii4 a petltfon
    with the county Judge or the oounty in which
    tha applicant desires to engage in nuoh burl-
    nom whioh petition       shall state as follows:
    Ii a manufaoturer:       (1) That he Is a law-
    abiding, taxpaying ditizen of this State,
    over twenty-one (21) years 0r age; that he
    has be8n.a resident of the county wherein
    auah lloense ie sought for a period of more
    than one year next preoeding the tiling        of
    suoh petition;     and that he has not been oon-
    vlated or a relony within two (2) years la-
    mediately preceding      the filing   or such petl-
    tiion.
    (2) If a co-partnership,          thaO all indlvlduals
    have the ``amequallfluatloncr         provided  in para-
    graph (1) abovei
    (3) If a eorporatlon,    that appiloant  is
    organized and chartered under, and has OOIU-
    plied with, all aorporatfon      laws or this State
    applloable    to such corporation,   that the prlndpal
    plaoe OS buslnesa is ln the oounty where suoh
    lloense is sought, and the president and xaanag?r
    shall sake an affidavit      that he posseseen all
    quallricatlons    Provided in paragraph (1) above.
    If a distributor,     general    or looal:
    (1) AppliOant shall give the same ikforaka-
    tion required of a nmntiaoturer lnoluding the
    plaoe or plaoes where his business shall be
    transaoted,  and the bounty or oountles where
    his sales are to be made.
    If a retailer:
    (1) The same information        require’d    or the
    Honorable Woodrow Curtis,   Page 3
    manutaoturer.
    (2) The aormot addrese of premises to
    be used by the applloaat Sor the sale of
    beer, and whether he tl$airee to sell beer
    ror consumption on or off the premises.
    (3) He shall enumerate the kinds of
    business In whioh he is engaged or In whloh
    he Intends to engage on the lloensed premises
    and other premlws under his oontrol oi wbioh
    the lloensed premises is a part.
    (4) That applloant.hae   no finanolal in-
    terest In any establishment      authorized to aell
    dlstillod    eplritrr:
    (5) That no person engaged in the busi-
    neas oi selling   distilled  spirita haa any
    ffnanolal  intere8t In the business to be oon-
    duated under the lloense    sought by the applleant.
    (6) That he has not had any intereat QI
    any license to sell beer whloh llosnse has been
    canaeu4a or revoked .withi.n the twelve (121
    month next preor6lng   the date of the present
    applfoation  ror lloanee r
    (7) That he is not residenced   or domioll-
    ed with’any person who has any flnanolal    in-
    terest with any establ$shment engaged ln’the
    business 0r selling   aistill4a epiritr, or any
    person In whose nants any lloense has been oan-
    oellea or revoked withln the twelve (12) mmth
    preoedtig  the present lioense;
    (8) If applioat&iOr    retailer’s  lloease  Is.
    a oorporationi  applioatlon   shall show that the
    president or manager thereof has been a.resident
    or the oounty wherein the lloenee is sought for
    more than one year next preoeding the date ot
    the applloatlon   and that no oii$Oer of the oor-
    poration is dlsqualltled    In any.other manner that
    would prevent him from holdlug euoh lioense      in
    his own nameiW
    Eonorable   Woodrow Curtl6,     Page 4
    Artlole   667-S,   Penal 
    Code, supra
    ,      apeoifloally
    provides that the applicant
    . -. must have been
    . . - a resident-_ of
    the oounty wherein suon uoense is sougnt ror a perloa or
    rim; than one year next preoeding        the f’lllng    of such petl-
    .
    Naturally, the question arises as to the legal
    meaning of the term or word *resldentW.    A8 used in some
    statutes, the term WreslaentW and *‘domicileW have the sanm
    meaning; in others they have not.    See the aames of Pltts-
    burg Hater Heater Co. Y. Sullivan,   24325. Vf. 676 and Halver-
    aon Y. Livengood, 4 6. yi. (24) 588.   Texas Jurlsprudenoe,
    Vol. 15, p. 7-11.
    We quote rrom Corpus furls,       Vol   19, p. ,397, as         roi-
    lows :
    “Generally,   where a statute preeorlb-
    ed re4ldenoe a4 a qualitloatlon       tar the
    33djc&wn* 0r a prlrlloge,      or the exerolm
    ot a rranohlse,    and/or whenever the terms
    are ‘Used in oonneotlon with subjeota of
    domeatio policy,    domioile and reaidenae are
    equivalent.     Statutory .oonstruction   a&*
    sometimea arteot the question-.”
    In Volume 54, p. 708, Corpus Juris,          we find      the
    rollowing   deflnltlonr
    “The best definition is that to be de-
    ducted from the Roman Law; that a man’s
    reeldenoe ie the pl444 whore hi4 family
    dwells or whioh he makes the ohi;er seat’ or
    his artairs   and intereat.   Residence is the
    favorite   term employed In the statutes to
    express the connection between pers$~ and
    plaoa.    The meaning when employed In a
    statute is often provocative    of dispute,
    often making it dirrfwt        to give an exaot
    detinftion  ot what is meant by residence as
    used in partioular   statutee,   tor when ured
    in etatutee it has airrerrnt     meaning4 in
    dlrrerent  oonneotlons,   and may be used 'with
    difrerent  meanings In different     statutes,
    and also, it sometimes has d@ierent        shades
    of meaning in the sfatute8 and even In the
    aonstruat ion.   An examination or the autbor-
    itles disaloses   that it has received dlf-
    Honorable hoodrow Curt&,         Page 5
    ferent derlnltlone       in rsrfoue oases, prln-
    cipally    Involving rranohlee,      taxation,  and
    juriealction.       As Its 8tatutory aeflnltlon
    depends upon the legislative         purpose ae
    well as the context of the statute          It must
    be construed In every oaee in aoaordanoe
    with the objeot and intent of the statute
    In whlcrh it oocure; henoe its meaning Is
    to be determined from the fact8 and olroum-
    stances taken together In each partloular
    case.    However, it is said that when used
    In the. statutes,      or aotions,   or suite re-
    1aUng to toxe.tlon,      rights 0r suitrage,
    dlvoroe,    limitation    of aotione,   and the
    like, it le used In the sense ot legal
    residence,     that 18 to, cay, place of doml-.
    oile or permanent abode."
    In rl?w of the foregoing   authorities   and the raote
    stated   inyour inquiry,  you are reepeotfully    advised that
    it is  the opinion or this department that Mr. Beok oamot
    .fy as a reeldent oi lrio County under Article      66T-S or
    the Penal Code.
    Trustlug   that the foregoing    anewere yo&     inquiry,
    we remain
    Yours very truly
    ATTORNEY
    OENJiRAL
    OPTEUS
    Ardell   Willlanis
    APPROVED
    J-W 6,         1939
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-1041

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017