Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1944 )


Menu:
  •              OFFICE   OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL    OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    HonoaableWaylor Rurrell
    Dirtr$otAttorney
    76th JudloialDfrtriot
    It. t1eamant,toxa*
    Dew   sir:
    gulltt to a oh8rge
    rlloo la a-murder
    wnt, and after hear-
    smaa the punlshmellt.
    rtnent*soplnlonon
    rd by lndlatavmtof
    h lndlotmentaoatslnr
    vas ooamlttodvlth
    trial o? the mm
    e aourt to plead @its
    the Interventionof a
    or vlthoutmallae.
    endnnt to waive 8 jury and
    at’8 plea of guilty to a oharge
    It la ruggestedthat b&ore trial of the oases you
    state in open oourt, alao by vrlttenmotion, thnt the svldencre
    vi11 not suatalnmurder with mallow aforethoughtend tbat the
    State vlshee to abnndon that part of the lndlctment Centr
    State  (1913) 152 9. w 635 Cle v State (1913) id’
    %‘The     oourt should;oi i0-k              order grMit& the
    ~0otion.fn thi aonneationve direot your attentionto Sville
    V* State, (1929$ 25 3. w. (26) 1098, whereinthe aourt 88
    -xa+
    HonOrUble'BaylorRussell,page 2
    'The indictmentcharged that lpmllant did vol-
    untarilykill B. J. Rendrlxby shootinghim with a
    For the ffrst time sinoe the passage of chap-
    !%274, Act8 RegularSession 1927, redefiningthe
    offeasoof nurder~ the point 18 mde thnt vhlle it
    lo su??lolentunder snid act for an ladlotmentfor
    ;Fez,o     ohurge that the lcouseddid voluutarlly
    thnt in cases vherelnthe state proposrs
    to aik II &lshmsat greaterthaa f5ve JOUS for the
    o??on#e,the lndlotmentshouldallego that    the klll-
    lng was upon ulloe afore thought. . .,
    II
    . . .*
    "Whileour presort rtatute raker murder of
    every voluntarykilling,it 18 also speol?ledf.n
    the statute that in every murder case the oourt
    shall tell the jury that, unless the killingvas::up-
    on malice aforethought,they cannot assess the pun-
    lsbasntns a psrlod longer than flvo years   hence It
    18 plain thnt murder vlthoutmalice aforethought 18
    punlrrhableby imprisonmentfor not less than two nor
    8or@ than five years, vhile murder upon malice aforo-
    thoughtmy be punishedby death or any period o?
    Imprisonmentnot less than tvo yews. In other
    vords, l? the state vlshes to seek a grsaterpenal-
    ty than ?lUe years.beoauseo? the 088a06 0r 8ui00
    aforethought-- aa IndispensableeE meat o? the
    eahancedpenaltyunder the aev statute-- the In-
    dictmentshouldallege that   the killingvas upon
    such ma1100 aforethought,"
    The statutedefinesmurder,V.A.P.C.,Artiole 1256,
    481
    “Uhoevar shall voluntarilykill aay person vlth-
    In this State shall be guilty of murder. Rurder
    ahall be dI8tlnguIshed?ron every other 8peolsso?
    homloldeby the abswce of oloumstanoes    vhioh rs-
    duae the offenseto nsgllgsnthorioldbor vhiob ex-
    ouse or juatitythe killing.."
    SSIJalso   Homicide,   22   TAX., P. 572, 4 97, aad P* 628,
    1 125, note 16.
    .
    .
    410
    BonorableTnylor Rassell,psgs 3
    Your identicalquestionvss before the o;~t~;l~
    pnrte Wagnoa (193@, _125 8. Y. (26) 572, and Bx pa
    : 7z9mrT57-B.      Y. (la) 892‘. In those oases the oourt per&ted
    the skte   to lbaadoa- t&t    mrt of the l~otment   vhloh vould
    olassi?y  the felony casm ai a capital offense,   the defendants
    11 than waived a Jury aad entered pleas of guilty before the trial
    court vlthout a jury.      The court of e?ltinalAppeals sustaiaod
    the trial eoarts,
    ra Turks v. Stste   (W?),    165   3.   WO (24)   460,   a*   00
    864,   the   OOt&   Uld:
    .  it aov appears to bo the settledlav of
    this s~a~a*tht oae lcourod of a felony less than
    capitalmay, undsr his pka of guilty, valve a trial
    by Jury aad his    pualebaent   my be fixed       w tb trial
    judgr,provltlodr(a) the Stat0 latroduooo             ovidmoo
    su??la ientto a h 0 1 1lc o wo dguilty
    th8                          0s the 0rr~a80
    o&rpd) latl (b) no faots are reoelved in ovldeaoo
    rklng lvldeat the inn00 snoo o? t&     loowed, or
    vhlch  reasonably an& ?airly present such as an ls-
    SW    0sfact.   Unless the facts brlug t&    oase vlth-
    ¶a the rule stated, the trlal judge 18 withoutau-
    thority to render a dud&meat finding the aoanwd
    guilty,beoatue, if the btatr ?alls to shov the guilt
    0s tb loouled, no ooavlotlon can r0110v3 and, if
    1          lvldeaoebe reoolved shoving the loouced to be ln-
    aoooat 0s th8 orrense charged, then     the plea 0s guil-
    ty is supplanted by the entry or a plea of not guilty,
    in vhloh event the trlsl    judge 1s vlthout authority
    to deterdam the guilt? of th8 8oOwody"
    Yours wry truly
    cz
    DIvld Wuatoh
    A8slstsat
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-5886

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1944

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017