-
, GERALD C. MANN Aun.vcarv 1'1. -!cr:x.zn -sy xxxxx Honorable R* E. Bibb County Judge Maverick County Eagle Pass, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-4979 Re: vvhere a duly elected and qualified county attorney has been inducted into the Armed Fcrces cf' the United States and has taken no steps to dischar;e the duties of his office, what can the commissioners' court do relative to hav- ing the duties cf county attorney performed? lie acknowledge receipt of your request for an opin- icn on the above question, including a letter dated January 20, last, from Honorable David h. Hume, an attorney of your city, who states he is writing same at your request, Under the provisions of Article 4399 of the Revised Civil statutes of Texas, this department is prohibited from rendering 1e;al opinions to county judges, but, in view of the fact that your county is without the services of the county attorney at the present, we feel it not inappropriate to answer your questions. vile understand the facts relative to said matter to be as follows: Mr. Van Haile iicparland was i~nducted into the Armed Forces of the United States in October of last year. At that time he was county attorney of your county, was re-elected at the November electicn, has duly qualified by taking the oath of cffice and making bond, but he has not since returned and has taken no steps relative tc discharging his duties. In our Opinion No. O-3448, a copy of which is at- tached hereto, this department held that the office of county attorney did not become vacant upon the induction of the _’ . Honorable R. E. Bibb, page 2 O-4979 incumbent into the Army. We also held that such officer was entitled to his salary during the term of his office, or until a vacancy was established. Article 331, Revised Civil Statutes, provides that county attorneys, by consent of the commissioners' court shall have power to appoint one or more assistants, and Article 3982 also deals with the appointment of such assistants, but it is specifically provided in Article 3902 that the commissioners' court shall not attempt to influence the appointment of any person as an assjstant. Mr. McFarland being the present coun- ty attorney of your county, the appointment of someone by the commissioners' court to serve as county attorney could be nothing more than the appointment of' an assistant, which is clearly prohibited by the above statute. It is the opinion of this department, therefore, that the commissioners' court does not have authority to name another to act as county at- torney during the time Mr. McFarland is in the Army. In this connection we take occasion to say the whole situation wculd be greatly clarified if the county attorney would, with the approval of the commissioners' court of your county, appoint an assistant, as has been done under the same circumstances in several counties of this State. We direct your attention to Article 334, Revised statutes, which reads as fol$ows: "The district and county attorneys, upon re- quest, shall give an opinion or advice in writing to any county or precinct officer of their dis- trict or county, touching their official duties." The above quoted statute makes it the duty of your district attorney to advise your county and precinct officers in writing about a11 matters touching their respective offi- cial duties. We feel sure your district attorney will gladly and ably perform that duty. Article 339, Revised Statutes, reads as follows: When it shall come to the knowledge. of any district or county attorney that any officer in hiss district or county entrusted with the collec- tion or safe keeping of any public Parids is in any manner whatsoever neglecting or abusj~n; the trust confided in him, or in any way failing to dis- charge his duties under the law, he shall institute Honorable R. E. Bibb, page 3 O-4979 such proceedings as arc necessary to compel the performance of such duties by such officer and to preserve and protect the public interests." Article 27, Code of Criminal Procedure, is as follows: "It shall be the duty of the district or county attorney to present by information to the court hnving jurisdiction, any officer for neglect or failure of any duty enjoined upon such officer, when such neglect CL' :failure can be presentsd:by information, whenever it snal! come to the knowl- ed,ge of said attorney that there has been a neg- lect cr failure of duty upon the part of said of- ficer; and he shall bring to the notice of the grand jury any act of violation of law or neglect of failure of duty upon the part of any officer, when such violation, neglect or failure are not presented by information, and whenever the same may come to his knowledge.' The duties imposed by Article 339 pertain to civil actions while Article 27 has reference to crimi~nal proceeding which both county and district attorneys are required to inst- tute when warranted by the facts, With reference to other duties imposed and authority conferred upon hat-h county and district attorneys, you atten- tion is directed to Articles 28, 29, and 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which Articles read respectively as fol- lows : Article 28, "Upon complaint being made be- fore a district or county attorney that sn offense has been committed in his district or county, he shall reduce the complaint to writing and cause the same to be signed and sworn to by the com- plainant, and it shall be duly attested by said attorney." Article 29, "If the offense be a misdemeancr, the attorney shall forthwith prepare an informa- tion based upon such complaint and file the same in the cour~tbaaing jurisdiction. If the offense be a felony, he shall forthwith f;ile the complaint with a magistrate of the county. . Honorable R. E. Bibb, vge 4 O-4.979 Article 30. "For the purp ose mentioned in the two preceding articles, district and county attorneys are authorized to administer oaths." We also call your ,attention to Article 31, Code of Criminal Procedure, which reads as follows: "'Whenever any district or conrmty attorney fails to attend any term of the district, county of justice's court, the judge of said court or such justice may appoint some ccmpetent attorney to perform the duties of such district or county attorney,who shall be allowed the same compensa- tion for his services as is allowed the district attorney or county attorney. Said appointment shall not extend beyond the term cf the court at which it is made, and shall be vacated upon thf: appearance of the district or county attorney. Under said Article 31, a county attorney pro' ternmay ,not be appointed when.county or justice court is in vacatn. Moore v. State, 119 S M(. 858. . A county attorney pro tern cannot be ap:.-tintedin term time unless both the county and district Pttorney are absent. This appears to be the eonstructicn placed upon this Article by the courts. Daniels v. State, 77 S. liJ. 215'; Butler v. State, 299 S' W. 420. As a matter of precaution, the order of the court appointing a ccunty attorney pro tom should show that neither the county attorney nor district attorney was present. Such as appcintment may be made to represent the State in all cases and matters coming before the court at the term at which the appointment is made or in a particular case only. The appointment cannot extend beyond the term, (State v. Manlove,
33 Tex. 798) but if a county attorney pro tern is appointed at one term cl? court to represent the St::Le ???-a case, and qualif!~ed i~nder cud;‘:aspcintme?t, he may prosecute the case7 at a subscquent~ t;r~ 8;~j.tho!~t rc-appointment. Narnoch V. StaLc, 7 Cr. 1~. 269. ,ihcn i;county attorney pro,tern is ap- pointed, it appears that he must take the constitu,t?%al cath of office as county attorney pro tern. Marnoch v.
State, supra. Such an attorney pro ternhas all the powers and duties of the regular pr.osecuting attorney. State v. Lackey,
35 Tex. 357. They are evidently authorized to prepare and take acknowledg- ments to complaints, prepare and file informations. Article 30, c: c. P. , Honorable R. E. Bibb, page 5 Of course, no person should be appointed county at- torney pro tern in a particular case where he is for my reason disqualified to represent the State. It will be noted that said Article 31 also applies to justice courts, and what has heretofore been said with reference to appointment of a county attorney pro tern by a county judge applies to a justice of the peace. We think it is also applicable to any judge who sits as an examining court o Article8 246, et seq, c. c. UP, A complaint may be acknowledged before a justice of the peace or any other officer authorized by law to take or administer oaths. Articles 8@ and 883, C, Co P, The statute (Article 28, C, C. P.) provides that upon a complaint being,made before a district or county at- tornex that an offense has been committed in his districtor county, he shall reduce the complaint ti writing and cause the same to be signed and sworn to by the complainant, and it shall be duly attested by him and the succeeding Article requires him, if the offense be a misdemeanor, to prepare an information based thereon and file the same in the court hav- ing jurisdiction and, if a felony, he shall forthwith file the ccmplaint with a magistrate of the county. In our opin- icn, Article 28 is not exclusive as to who shall preoare com- plaints, and that where the county attorney is absent, the complaint may be prepared by a justice of the peace or any other officer or person, but, of course, the complaint must be sworn to by the complainant before some officer authorized to administer oaths, If the complaint charges a misdemeanor and the defendant is to be tried in the county court then an information based upon said complaint must be filed in that court. Where the county attorney is absent, the district at- torney is authorized to prepare and file the information in the county court, Cody v, State, 47 S,W, (2d) 297- In this connection, we call your attention to the fact that when a complaint is filed in the county court the information based thereon may be filed at any time before,the offense is barred by limitation, Roberson v. ;jtate, 17 Tex. Ct, App., 317, 319; Gentry v0 State, 117 S. U. 696; Day v. State, 74 S, W, 6-19, 700. Therefore, the district attorney or the county attorney ro tern will have an opportunity to file the information be- F-ore the case is called for trial. Honorahlt R. E. Bibb, page 6 O-4979 In Texas Jurisprudence, Volume 11, page 575, the following rule is stated: "The commissioners' court has power to em- attorneys to assist the regularly constitut- ea officers of the county in the prosecution of its claims and suits, and to pay for such servi- ces out of the county funds. It seems, however, that the commissioners' court does not have the power to deprive, the county attorney of his rightful authority in this regard. Ths employ- ment cf counsel is restricted to special cases where the'semrices of an attorney are required; nor has the court power to make an crder which will warrant the payment of county money to an nttorne a for services neither required nor per- formed. S. ;W.413; Gibson (Adams v. beagle??, 2.5'0 v. ~PV~S,
236 S.W. 202; Terre11 v. Greene,
31 S.W. 631; Grooms v. Atascosn County, (c)iv.App.)
32 S.W. 188). It is our opinion that under the facts stated by you and the above rules of law, the commissioners' court would not have the authority to engage ccunsel to perform the duties of county attorney of your county, but that it would have au- thority to engage counsel tcm assist the ccunty attorney in the performance of the duties referred to in Article 339, provided it did not attempt to deprive the county attorney of his right- ful authority in this regard. It would also have authority to engage counsel to advise said court, as it has been held that Article 334. was intended to impose a duty upon the coun- ty and district attorneys, and not as a restriction upon the commissioners' court in the employment of attorneys to advise and render services to the county in important matters coming before it for its consideration, Gibson, et al., v. Davis, et al.,
236 S.W. 202. Such coumsel ,:touldnot be required to take the oath of office. Trusting that this satisfactorily answers your in- quiry, we we Very truly yours JWB:db--PAM ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS APPROVED FEB 24'1943 GROVER SELLERS BY Jas* ;v.Bassett FIRST ASSISTANT Assistant ATTORNEY GENERAL APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE BY BWB, CHAIRMAN
Document Info
Docket Number: O-4979
Judges: Gerald Mann
Filed Date: 7/2/1942
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017