Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1992 )


Menu:
  •                                 @ffice of tfy 5lttornep @heral
    &ate        of UJexa4
    DAN MORALES                                     December 4,1992
    .ATTOR.NEI’CES’ERAl.
    Honorable John Whitmire                            Opinion No. DM-184
    chairman
    Jntergovemmental Relations                         Re: Whether the provisions of House Bill
    Texas State Senate                                 799 of the 72d Legislature apply to the
    P. 0. Box 12068                                    procurement of brokerage and investment
    Austin Texas 78711                                 services by state agencies (RQ-239)
    Dear Senator Whitmire:
    You ask whether the provisions of House Bill 799 of the 72d Regular
    Legislative Session apply to the procurement of brokerage and investment services
    by state agencies involved in money management. House Bill 799 amends article
    601b, V.T.C.S., and relates to state contracts for the procurement of goods and
    services from disadvantaged businesses.” Acts 1991,72d Leg., ch. 677, at 24.57. The
    provisions of House Bill 799 became effective September 1, 1991, but shah apply
    only to contracts awarded on or after September 1, 1992. Id 9 7, at 2459. We
    understand your question primarily relates to the activities of statewide retirement
    systems, such as the Employees Retirement System (ERS) and the Teacher
    Retirement System (TRS), that are authorized to invest their assets in securities
    without distinction as to their source. See, e.g., Gov’t Code $Q815301(a)
    (Employees Retirement System), 825301(a) (Teacher Retirement System).
    We also understand your question pertains to services of individuals who
    supply investment advice to the boards of trustees of retirement systems as well as to
    services of individuals who execute securities transactions at the direction of and on
    behalf of the boards of trustees of the retirement systems. See, e.g., id 39 815301(c)
    (board of trustees of ERS may contract with private, professional investment
    managers to assist board in investing assets of the system), 825301(h) (same
    authority for TRS board of trustees). We will address your question accordingly.’
    As this opinion shah explain, we conclude that contracts for investment counseling
    ‘This opiniondots   not address the    applicability
    of   article 601b outside of the procurement
    context.
    p.     965
    Honorable John Whitmire - Page 2                 W-184)
    or investment advice are excepted from compliance with the terms of House Bill
    799, however, we believe the boards of trustees of ERS and TRS must comply with
    its provisions when entering into contracts for brokerage services.
    House Bill 799 added the following language to section 3.10 of article 601b,
    V.T.C.S.
    (b) The [General Services] commission SMI make a good
    fzith effort to assistdisadvantagedburinmesz to receive at Least10
    pemnt of the total value of all contractawad for the purchase of
    supplies, materials, services, and equipment that the commission
    expects to make for a store agency in its fiscal year. The
    commission shall estimate the expected total value of an
    agency’s contract awards not later than the 60th day of the
    2House Bii 799 dctiacs ‘disadvantaged business’ to mean
    (A) a corporation formed for the porpcee of mak@ a profit in which at
    least 51 percent of all dasscs of the shares of stock or other equitable sccorities
    are owned by one or more persoos who arc socially disadvantaged because of
    their identification as members of certain groups, including bIack Americans,
    Hispanic Americans, women, Asian Pacific Am@aas, and Native Americans,
    who have suffered the cffecxs of d&&minatory practices or similar insidious
    circumstaaces over which they have M control;
    (B) a so& proprietorship created for the purpose of making a protit that
    is 100 percent owned, operated, and controlled by a person dcsaii          by
    Paragraph (A) of this subdivision;
    (C) a partnership formed for the purpose of maLing a profit ia which at
    least 51 percent of the assets and interest in the partnership is owned by one or
    more persoas desaiid      by Paragaph (A) of this subditioe         Tbosc pcrsoos
    most have a proportionate iatercst in the control, operation, and management
    0fth~partnenbiprs] dfti
    (D) a joint vcature in which each entity in the joint VcnNrC is a
    disatitaged   business under this subdivision; or
    Q a supplier contract [sic] bctwcen a dkadnatagcd business under this
    subdivisioa and a prime contractor under which the disadnntagtd business is
    directly involved io the manufacture or distriiution of the supplies or materials
    or otherwise warehouses and ships the supplies.
    Acts 1991,72d Leg., ch. 6i7,§ l, at 2457 (V.T.C.S. art. @lb, 0 1.02(3)).
    p.   966
    Honorable John Whitmire - Page 3            t&184)
    agency’s fiscal year and may revise the estimate as new
    information requires.
    Acts 1991,72d Leg., ch. 677.0 5, at 2458 (emphasis added). We are advised that the
    boards of trustees of ERS and TRS, rather than the General Services Commission,
    make contracts for the services in question.
    The resolution of your question therefore will depend on whether the
    procurement in question is for services within the meaning of article 601b. The
    statute defines “services” as “the fumishmg of skilled or, unskilled labor or
    professional work but does not include:”
    (1) professional services covered by the Professional
    Services Procurement Act [article 664-4,V.T.C.S.];
    (2) services of an employee of a state agency;
    (3) consulting services or services of a private consultant as
    defined by [article 6252-llc, V.T.C.S.]; or
    (4) services of public utilities.
    V.T.C.S. ai% 6Olb, 5 3.01(c).
    The second and fourth exceptions obviously are not involved here. The
    Professional Services Procurement Act does not by its terms apply to the services of
    investment brokers, advisers, or managers. Article 6252-11~ applies to contracts for
    private consulting services by state agencies. It defines “consulting service” to mean
    “the human service of studying or advising a state agency under a contract that does
    not involve the traditional relationship of employer and employee.” V.T.C.S. art.
    6252-l& 5 l(1). The act spechically states that it does not apply to and is not
    intended to discourage the use of consulting services provided by, among other
    K=o%       “investment counselors,” and “other consultants whose services are
    determined by the governing board of a retirement system trust fund to be necessary
    for the performance of its fiduciary duties under the state constitutior~” 
    Id. 5 2(a)(3).
    (6).
    The consulting services of investment counselors thus are excepted from the
    provisions of both V.T.C.S. articles 6252-11~and 601b. However, we do not believe
    that brokerage services which involve only the execution of securities transactions
    on the instructions of a retirement system’s board of trustees are excepted under the
    provision just quoted because such services may not be classified as consulting
    P-   967
    Honorable John Whitmire - Page 4          W-184)
    services under the aa. Accordingly, we conclude that brokerage services are not
    excepted from article 6Olb by article 6252-11~. The boards of trustees of ERS and
    TRS must therefore comply with the terms of section 3.10(h) of article 601b,
    V.T.CS, when contracting for the setvices of investment brokers.
    SUMMARY
    Article 6Olb, V.T.CS, applies to contracts for investment
    brokerage services of the Employees Retirement System and the
    Teacher Retirement System The boards of trustees of these
    retirement systems must comply with the provisions of House
    Bill 799 of the 72d Legislature when awarding such contracts.
    ERS and TRS are therefore required to make a good faith effort
    to assist disadvantaged businesses in obtaining at least ten
    percent of the total vahte of contracts awarded for investment
    brokerage services.
    DAN      MORALES
    Attorney General of Texas
    WILL PRYOR
    First Assistant Attorney General
    MARYKELLER
    Deputy Assistant Anomey General
    RENEAHIcKs
    Special Assistant Attorney General
    MADELEINE B. JOHNSON
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Prepared by Steve Aragbn
    Assistant Attorney General
    p.   968
    

Document Info

Docket Number: DM-184

Judges: Dan Morales

Filed Date: 7/2/1992

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017